Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration
- 556 Downloads
Magnetic resonance T2 mapping allows for the quantification of water and proteoglycan content within tissues and can be used to detect early cartilage abnormalities as well as to track the response to therapy. The goal of the present study was to use T2 mapping to quantify intervertebral disk water content according to the Pfirrmann classification.
Materials and methods
This study involved 60 subjects who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (a total of 300 lumbar disks). The degree of disk degeneration was assessed in the midsagittal section on T2-weighted images according to the Pfirrmann classification (grades I to V). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed among grades to determine the cut-off values.
In the nucleus pulposus, T2 values tended to decrease with increasing grade, and there was a significant difference in T2 values between each grade from grades I to IV. However, there was no significant difference in T2 values in the anterior or posterior annulus fibrosus. T2 values according to disk degeneration level classification were as follows: grade I (>116.8 ms), grade II (92.7–116.7 ms), grade III (72.1–92.6 ms), grade IV (<72.0 ms).
T2 values decreased with increasing Pfirrmann classification grade in the nucleus pulposus, likely reflecting a decrease in proteoglycan and water content. Thus, T2 value-based measurements of intervertebral disk water content may be useful for future clinical research on degenerative disk diseases.
KeywordsLumbar disk degeneration T2 relaxation time Classification
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 3.Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. 1st ed. Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1992Google Scholar
- 6.Weinstein JN, Gordon SL, Buckwalter JA, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Low back pain: a scientific and clinical overview. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1996Google Scholar