Subcutaneous epidermal inclusion cysts: Ultrasound (US) and MR imaging findings
- 2.1k Downloads
To describe the characteristic US and MR findings of subcutaneous epidermal inclusion cysts.
Materials and methods
Seventy-nine patients with subcutaneous epidermal inclusion cysts underwent US (n = 70), MR (n = 7), or both (n = 2). On US, the margin, shape, echogenicity, through-transmission, wall, internal debris and vascularity were evaluated. On MR, the shape, wall, signal intensity, internal debris, and enhancement pattern were evaluated.
On US, characteristic findings were well circumscribed (n = 69, 96%), ovoid-shaped (n = 56, 78%), heterogeneously and mildly echogenic (n = 66, 92%), increased through-transmission (n = 66, 92%) and low echoic rim (n = 48, 67%). Internal debris was seen in 31 cases (43%) and often contained linear echogenic reflections (n = 12, 17%), dark clefts (n = 13, 18%), or a mixture (n = 5, 7%). Most masses showed no Doppler flow (n = 70, 97%). On MR, all cases demonstrated a well-demarcated oval-shaped mass with a surrounding rim. On T1-weighted image (WI), the mass showed slightly high T1 signal in 4/9 (44%) and iso-signal in 5/9 (56%). On T2WI, the mass showed high signal in 6/9 (67%), intermediate in 2/9 (22%), and a target appearance in 1/9 (11%). Internal linear dark T2 signal debris was observed in 4/9 (44%). All lesions showed peripheral rim enhancement without central enhancement.
On US, subcutaneous epidermal inclusion cysts are usually well-circumscribed, oval-shaped, mildly echogenic masses with occasional linear anechoic and/or echogenic reflections, increased through-transmission, hypoechoic rim and no Doppler flow. On MR, an intermediate to high T2 signal mass with occasional low signal debris and no central enhancement can strengthen the diagnosis.
KeywordsUltrasound MR Epidermal inclusion cyst
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Lever WF, Lever GS. Tumor and cysts of epidermis. In: Elder D, editor. Histopathology of the skin. 8th ed. Philadelphia, JB: Lippincott, 1997, p. 685-746Google Scholar
- 2.Elder D, Elenitsas R, Jaworsky C, Johnson Jr B. Lever’s histopathology of the skin. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 695–721.Google Scholar
- 5.Dogra V. Testicular epidermoid cysts. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(4):1075–5.Google Scholar
- 6.Jackson VP, Edmond VJ. Breast ultrasonography. In: LW JVP, Fu KL, Fu YS, editors. Diagnosis of disease of the breast. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 175–92.Google Scholar
- 9.Langer JE, Ramchandani P, Siegelman ES, Banner MP. Epidermoid cysts of the testicle: Sonographic and MR imaging features. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(5):1295–9.Google Scholar
- 10.Shibata T, Hatori M, Satoh T, Ehara S, Kokubun S. Magnetic resonance imaging features of epidermoid cyst in the extremities. Arch Orthop Traum Su. 2003;123(5):239–41.Google Scholar
- 12.Brenner JS, Cumming WA, Ros PR. Testicular epidermoid cyst—sonographic and MR findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(6):1344–4.Google Scholar
- 13.Cho JH, Chang JC, Park BH, Lee JG, Son CH. Sonographic and MR imaging findings of testicular epidermoid cysts. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(3):743–8.Google Scholar