Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 181–187 | Cite as

Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair—Does the meniscus heal?

A clinical and radiological follow-up examination to verify meniscal healing using a 3-T MRI
  • Thomas Hoffelner
  • Herbert Resch
  • Rosemarie Forstner
  • Mayer Michael
  • Bernd Minnich
  • Mark Tauber
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to correlate clinical and radiological results using a 3-T MRI to verify meniscal healing after arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repair.

Materials and methods

We selected 27 patients (14 men and 13 women) with an average age of 31 ± 9 years and retrospective clinical examinations and radiological assessments using a 3-T MRI after all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair were conducted. Repair of the medial meniscus was performed in 19 patients and of the lateral meniscus in eight. In 17 patients (63%), we performed concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 ± 1.7 years. The Lysholm score and Tegner activity index were used for clinical evaluation. Four grades were used to classify the radiological signal alterations within the meniscus: central globular (grade 1); linear horizontal or band-like (grade 2); intrameniscal alterations and linear signal alterations communicating with the articular surface (grade 3); and complex tears (grade 4).

Results

At follow-up, the average Lysholm score was 76 ± 15 points, with ten of the patients placed in group 6 based on the Tegner activity index. MRI examinations revealed no signal alteration in three patients, grade 1 in 0, grade 2 in five, grade 3 in 13, and grade 4 in six. The MRI findings correlated positively with the clinical scores in 21 patients (78%).

Conclusions

Correlation of clinical and radiological examination was performed using 3-T MRI. In spite of satisfactory clinical outcomes at follow-up, a radiological signal alteration may still be visible on MRI, which was believed to be scar tissue, but could not be proven definitively. Imaging with a 3-Tesla MRI after meniscal suture surgery provides good but no definitive reliability on meniscus healing and therefore gives no advantage compared to 1.5-T MRI, with good clinical outcome using an all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair.

Clinical relevance

3T-MRI can not substitute diagnostic arthroscopy in patients with persistent complaints after arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series (EBM Level IV)

Keywords

3-T MRI Arthroscopy Meniscal suture All-inside repair technique FasT-Fix Device 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn JH, Wang JH, Yoo JC, Noh HK, Park JH. A pull out suture for transection of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: using a posterior trans-septal portal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1510–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, et al. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:889–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quinby JS, Golish SR, Hart JA, Diduch DR. All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1281–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, Miller MD, Fu FH. Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19 Suppl 1:161–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steenbrugge F, Van Nieuwenhuyse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Arthroscopic meniscus repair in the ACL-deficient knee. Int Orthop. 2005;29:109–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, et al. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:889–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCauley TR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234:53–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sampson MJ, Jackson MP, Moran CJ, Moran R, Eustace SJ, Shine S. Three Tesla MRI for the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament pathology: a comparison to arthroscopic findings. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1106–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    von Engelhardt LV, Schmitz A, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Wirtz DC, von Falkenhausen F. Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY, Riyazi N, Rosendaal FR, Nelissen RG, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239:811–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;43–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoller DW. Meniscal tears - Pathologic correlation with MR imaging - reply. Radiology. 1988;166:580–1.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stoller DW. The knee. Semin Roentgenol. 1995;30:277–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haklar U, Kocaoglu B, Nalbantoglu U, Tuzuner T, Guven O. Arthroscopic repair of radial lateral meniscus [corrected] tear by double horizontal sutures with inside-outside technique. Knee. 2008;15:355–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim PS, Schweitzer ME, Bhatia M, Giuliano V, Kaneriya PP, Senyk RM, et al. Repeat tear of postoperative meniscus: potential MR imaging signs. Radiology. 1999;210:183–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCauley TR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234:53–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barber FA, Harding NR. Meniscal repair rehabilitation. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:207–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barber FA, Click SD. Meniscus repair rehabilitation with concurrent anterior cruciate reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:433–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haas AL, Schepsis AA, Hornstein J, Edgar CM. Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:167–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barber FA, Schroeder FA, Oro FB, Beavis RC. FasT-Fix meniscal repair: mid-term results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1342–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller MD, Kline AJ, Gonzales J, Beach WR. Pitfalls associated with FasT-Fix meniscal repair. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:939–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Quinby JS, Golish SR, Hart JA, Diduch DR. All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1281–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:371–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    von Engelhardt LV, Schmitz A, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Wirtz DC, von Falkenhausen F. Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salvi AE, Bettinsoli R. Considerations about the knee arthrography for detection of meniscal tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:99–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mathieu L, Bouchard A, Marchaland JP, Potet J, Fraboulet B, Danguy-Des-Deserts M, et al. Knee MR-arthrography in assessment of meniscal and chondral lesions. Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research. 2009;95:40–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Steenbrugge F, Van Nieuwenhuyse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Arthroscopic meniscus repair in the ACL-deficient knee. Int Orthop. 2005;29:109–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schoth F, Kraemer N, Niendorf T, Hohl C, Gunther RW, Krombach GA. Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2258–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Hoffelner
    • 1
  • Herbert Resch
    • 1
  • Rosemarie Forstner
    • 2
  • Mayer Michael
    • 1
  • Bernd Minnich
    • 3
  • Mark Tauber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Traumatology and Sports InjuriesSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  3. 3.Department of Organismic BiologyUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations