Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 623–630 | Cite as

Total body height estimation using sacrum height in Anatolian Caucasians: multidetector computed tomography-based virtual anthropometry

  • Hakki Muammer Karakas
  • Osman Celbis
  • Ahmet Harma
  • Banu AliciogluEmail author
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

Estimation of total body height is a major step when a subject has to be identified from his/her skeletal structures. In the presence of decomposed skeletons and missing bones, estimation is usually based on regression equation for intact long bones. If these bones are fragmented or missing, alternative structures must be used. In this study, the value of sacrum height (SH) in total body height (TBH) estimation was investigated in a contemporary population of adult Anatolian Caucasians.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-six men (41.6 ± 14.9 years) and 43 women (41.1 ± 14.2 years) were scanned with 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to obtain high-resolution anthropometric data. SH of midsagittal sections was electronically measured. The technique and methodology were validated on a standard skeletal model.

Results

Sacrum height was 111.2 ± 12.6 mm (77–138 mm) in men and 104.7 ± 8.2 (89–125 mm) in women. The difference between the two sexes regarding SH was significant (p < 0.0001). SH did not significantly correlate with age in men, whereas the correlation was significant in women (p < 0.03). The correlation between SH and the stature was significant in men (r = 0.427, p < 0.0001) and was insignificant in women. For men the regression equation was \( \left[ {{\hbox{Stature}} = \left( {0.{3}0{6} \times {\hbox{SH}}} \right) + {137}.{9}} \right] \) (r = 0.54, SEE = 56.9, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Sacrum height is not susceptible to sex, or to age in men. In the presence of incomplete male skeletons, SH helps to determine the stature. This study is also one of the initial applications of MDCT in virtual anthropometric research.

Keywords

Body height estimation Multidetector computed tomography Osteometric analysis Sacrum height Virtual anthropometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Fund under the project of the MDCT research laboratory and under the respective subproject on forensic and orthopedic MDCT research (Grant no: I.U. BAP 2005 GUZ-1/GUDUMLU).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Fully G, Pineau H. Determination de la stature au moyen de squelette. Ann Med Leg. 1960;40:3–11.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krogman WM, Iscan MY. Determination of sex and parturition. In: The human skeleton in forensic medicine, 2nd ed. Springfield: Thomas; 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rollet F. De la menstruation de os longs du membres. These pour le doctorat en medecine, Paris, 1st series;1888.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trotter M, Gleser GC. Estimation of stature from long bones of American whites and negroes. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1952;10:463–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giroux CL, Wescott DJ. Stature estimation based on dimensions of the bony pelvis and proximal femur. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:65–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tibbetts GL. Estimation of stature from the vertebral column in American Blacks. J Forensic Sci. 1981;26:715–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jason DR, Taylor K. Estimation of stature from the length of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments of the spine in American whites and blacks. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40:59–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagesh KR, Pradeep Kumar G. Estimation of stature from vertebral column length in South Indians. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2006;8:269–72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Munoz JI, Linares-Iglesias M, Suarez-Peneranda JM, et al. Stature estimation from radiographically determined long bone length in a Spanish population sample. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46:363–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gozdziewski S. Correlations between spondylometric features and body height of man. Anat Anz. 1985;159:127–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karakas HM, Harma A. Femoral shaft bowing with age: a digital radiological study of Anatolian Caucasian adults. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008;14:29–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rühli FJ, Müntener M, Henneberg N. Age-dependent changes of the normal human spine during adulthood. Am J Hum Biol. 2005;17:460–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pelin C, Duyar I, Kayahan EM, Zagyapan R, Agildere M, Erar A. Body height estimation based on dimensions of sacral and coccygeal vertebrae. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:294–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundy JK. The mathematical versus anatomical methods of stature estimate from long bones. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1985;6:73–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Celbis O, Agritmis H. Estimation of stature and determination of sex from radial and ulnar bone lengths in a Turkish corpse sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;158:135–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hauser R, Smolinski J, Gos T. The estimation of stature on the basis of measurements of the femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:185–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radoinova D, Tenekedjiev K, Yordanov Y. Stature estimation from long bone lengths in Bulgarians. Homo. 2002;52:221–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jantz RL, Kimmerle EH, Baraybar JP. Sexing and stature estimation criteria for Balkan populations. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:601–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lazarevski MB. Pelvic bone system changes and pathogenesis of genital prolapse—a radiopelvimetric study. Gynaecol Perinatol (Zagreb). 2004;13:1–12.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelley MA. Parturition and pelvic changes. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979;51:541–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gallagher JC, Hedlund LR, Stoner S, Meeger C. Vertebral morphometry: normative data. Bone Miner. 1988;4:189–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP. Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4:341–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC, Meeger C, Stoner S. Change in vertebral shape in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989;44:168–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnell O, O'Neill T, Felsenberg D, Kanis J, Cooper C, Silman AJ. Anthropometric measurements and vertebral deformities. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:287–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dedouit F, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Telmon N, et al. Virtual anthropology and forensic identification: report of one case. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173:182–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mishra SR, Singh PJ, Agrawal AK, Gupta RN. Identification of sex of sacrum of Agra Region. J Anat Soc India. 2003;52:132–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryan I, Bidmos MA. Skeletal height reconstruction from measurements of the skull in indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;167:16–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grabherr S, Cooper C, Ulrich-Bochsler S, et al. Estimation of sex and age of ‘virtual skeletons’—a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:419–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giles E. Corrections for age in estimating older adults’ stature from long bones. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36:898–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yen K, Lövblad KO, Scheurer E, et al. Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173:21–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iris M, Celbis O. Estimation of height through humerus bone Turkish. J Forensic Sci. 2003;2:9–15.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Karacam B, Büyük Y, Şam B. Prediction of stature from femur length among Turkish population: an autopsy study. Adli Bilimler Dergisi. 2005;9:39–44.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Günay Y. Tibia uzunluğundan vücut boy uzunluğunun hesaplanmasi. Speciality thesis, Adli Tip Kurumu; 1995.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Şam B. Fibula uzunluğundan vücut boy uzunluğunun tahmini. Uzmanlık tezi (specialty thesis). Adli Tıp Kurumu; 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hakki Muammer Karakas
    • 1
  • Osman Celbis
    • 2
  • Ahmet Harma
    • 3
  • Banu Alicioglu
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyInonu University Medical Faculty, Turgut Ozal Medical CenterMalatyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Forensic MedicineInonu University Medical Faculty Turgut Ozal Medical CenterMalatyaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyInonu University Medical Faculty Turgut Ozal Medical CenterMalatyaTurkey
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyTrakya University Medical FacultyEdirneTurkey
  5. 5.Department of AnatomyTrakya University Health Sciences InstituteEdirneTurkey
  6. 6.EdirneTurkey

Personalised recommendations