Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 655–660 | Cite as

Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomography retroversion measurements

  • Clément M. L. Werner
  • Carol E. Copeland
  • Jeff Stromberg
  • Thomas Ruckstuhl
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

To find a correlation between the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and retroversion measurements (‘roof-edge angle’ and ‘equatorial-edge angle) on computed tomography (CT) scans. This would facilitate the interpretation of the cross-over sign regarding the amount of acetabular retroversion.

Materials and methods

Correctly projected AP pelvic radiographs (2,925 hips) were examined for the presence of the cross-over sign (COS), and the overlap ratio of the COS was measured. On CT scans of the same patients the ‘roof-edge angle’ (RE angle) and the ‘equatorial-edge angle’ (EE angle) were also calculated.

Results

A statistically significant but only weak relationship could be found between the overlap ratio of the COS and the ‘roof-edge angle’ (P < 0.0001; correlation coefficient −0.486) and between this ratio and the ‘equatorial-edge angle’ (P < 0.0001; correlation coefficient −0.395).

Conclusion

A relationship between the overlap ratio and orientation measurements on CT scans could be found, but it was less strong than expected.

Keywords

Hip Acetabulum Retroversion Impingement Cross-over sign Computed tomography Pelvic radiographs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help given by Prof. Dr. Burkhardt Seifert (Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich) with the statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop. 2003;417:112–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop. 2003;417:263–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG, Allen PD. The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:727–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leunig M, Beck M, Dora C, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement: trigger for the development of coxarthrosis. Orthopade. 2006;35:77–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leunig M, Ganz R. [Femoroacetabular impingement. A common cause of hip complaints leading to arthrosis]. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:9–10, 12–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, Martinez A, Beck M, Ganz R, et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the “cross-over-sign”. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:758–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop. 2003;407:241–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Werner CML, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Seifert B, Turen CH. Prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race adult trauma patient population. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74:766–72.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop. 2005;438:182–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banks KP, Grayson DE. Acetabular retroversion as a rare cause of chronic hip pain: recognition of the “figure-eight” sign. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36 Suppl 1:S108–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaberi FM, Parvizi J. Hip pain in young adults: femoroacetabular impingement. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):37–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meunier P, Lefevre C, Le Saout J, Kerboul B, Riot O, Meriot P, et al. A simple method for measuring anteversion of the acetabulum from a frontal radiograph of the hip. J Radiol. 1987;68:799–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tönnis D. Ueber die Aenderung des Pfannendachwinkels der Hüftgelenke bei Dreh- und Kippstellungen des kindlichen Beckens. Z Orthop Grenzgeb. 1962;96:462–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clément M. L. Werner
    • 2
    • 3
  • Carol E. Copeland
    • 1
  • Jeff Stromberg
    • 1
  • Thomas Ruckstuhl
    • 2
  1. 1.R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma CenterUniversity of Maryland Medical SystemsBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics, Uniklinik BalgristUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Division of Trauma SurgeryUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations