Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 131–139 | Cite as

Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of non-osteoarthritic adult acetabular dysplasia

  • Hiroshi ItoEmail author
  • Takeo Matsuno
  • Teruhisa Hirayama
  • Hiromasa Tanino
  • Yasuhiro Yamanaka
  • Akio Minami
Scientific Article



Little data exists on the original morphology of acetabular dysplasia obtained from patients without radiographic advanced osteoarthritic changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution and degree of acetabular dysplasia in a large number of patients showing no advanced degenerative changes using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).

Materials and methods

Eighty-four dysplastic hips in 55 consecutive patients were studied. All 84 hips were in pre- or early osteoarthritis without radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing, formation of osteophytes or cysts, or deformity of femoral heads. The mean age at the time of CT scan was 35 years (range 15–64 years). 3D images were reconstructed and analyzed using recent computer imaging software (INTAGE Realia and Volume Player). Deficiency types and degrees of acetabular dysplasia were precisely evaluated using these computer software.


The average Harris hip score at CT scans was 82 points. Twenty-two hips (26%) were classified as anterior deficiency, 17 hips (20%) as posterior deficiency, and 45 hips (54%) as lateral deficiency. No significant difference was found in the Harris hip score among these groups. The analysis of various measurements indicated wide variations. There was a significant correlation between the Harris hip score and the acetabular coverage (p < 0.001).


Our results indicated wide variety of deficiency type and degree of acetabular dysplasia. Hips with greater acetabular coverage tended to have a higher Harris hip score.


Hip dysplasia Computed tomography Congenital hip dislocation Hip osteoarthritis 


  1. 1.
    Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL. Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip: functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 1777–1792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Müller ME. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip: a study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 985–989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stulberg SD, Harris WH. Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. The Hip. Proceedings of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of The Hip Society. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1974: 82–93.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ. The natural history of congenital dislocation of the hip: a critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 137: 154–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ. The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979; 61: 334–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 1939; 83 Suppl 58: 1–135.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiberg G. Shelf operation in congenital dysplasia of the acetabulum and in subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953; 35: 65–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hadley NA, Brown TD, Weinstein SL. The effects of contact pressure elevations and aseptic necrosis on the long-term outcome of congenital hip dislocation. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 504–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maxian TA, Brown TD, Weinstein SL. Chronic stress tolerance levels for human articular cartilage: two nonuniform contact models applied to long-term follow-up of CDH. J Biomech 1995; 28: 159–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azuma H, Taneda H, Igarashi H, Fujioka M. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplastic hips in children by three-dimensional surface reconstruction computed tomography imaging. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10: 33–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP, Janzen DL, Munk PL. CT evaluation of periacetabular osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 526–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hernandez RJ. Concentric reduction of the dislocated hip: computed-tomographic evaluation. Radiology 1984; 150: 266–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hubbard AM, Dormans JP. Evaluation of developmental dysplasia, Perthes disease, and neuromuscular dysplasia of the hip in children before and after surgery: an imaging update. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 1067–1073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacobsen S, Rømer L, Søballe K. Degeneration in dysplastic hips: a computer tomography study. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34: 778–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Janzen D, Aipperesbach SE, Munk PL, et al. Three-dimensional CT measurement of adult acetabular dysplasia: technique, preliminary results in normal subjects and potential applications. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 352–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klaue K, Wallin A, Ganz R. CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 232: 15–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mechlenburg I, Nyengaard JR, Rømer L, Søballe K. Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 147–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murphy SB, Kijewski PK, Millis MB, Harless A. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 261: 214–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakamura S, Yorikawa J, Otsuka K, Takeshita K, Harasawa A, Matsushita T. Evaluation of acetabular dysplasia using a top view of the hip on three-dimensional CT. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5: 533–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roach JW, Hobatho MC, Baker KJ, Ashman RB. Three-dimensional computer analysis of complex acetabular insufficiency. J Pediatr Orthop 1997; 17: 158–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schlesinger AE, Hernandez RJ. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system in children: imaging with CT, sonography, and MR. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 729–741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tallroth K, Lepistö J. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: normal values for correction of dysplasia. Acta Orthop Scand 2006; 77: 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lequesne M, de Sèze S. Le faux profil du bassin: nouvelle incidence radiographique pour l’étude de la hanche: son utilité dans les dysplasies et les différentes coxopathies. Rev Rhum 1961; 28: 643–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anda S, Svenningsen S, Dale LG, Benum P. The acetabular sector angle of the adult hip determined by computed tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn 1986; 27: 443–447.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 115–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: 15–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tönnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1747–1770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anda S. Letter to Editor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286: 308–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 737–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Lessons leaned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 119–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deapen D. Cancer surveillance and information: balancing public health with privacy and confidentiality concerns (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006; 17: 633–637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Søballe K. Hip dysplasia. Treatment with osteotomy by means of Ganz: the Danish Orthopedic Society. Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 163 12: 1703.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Ito
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takeo Matsuno
    • 1
  • Teruhisa Hirayama
    • 1
  • Hiromasa Tanino
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Yamanaka
    • 1
  • Akio Minami
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAsahikawa Medical CollegeAsahikawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHokkaido University School of MedicineSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations