Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 37–42 | Cite as

Reproducibility of joint space width and the intermargin distance measurements in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee in various degrees of flexion

  • Toshiaki TakahashiEmail author
  • Norio Yamanaka
  • Masahiko Ikeuchi
  • Haruyasu Yamamoto
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

This study tested the variability and reproducibility of measurements of the joint space width (JSW) and intermargin distance (IMD) of the medial tibial plateau in specific positions of knee flexion in osteoarthritic knees in order to evaluate the most useful knee angle for radiographic measurements.

Design

Radiographs from 56 knees with osteoarthritis from 46 patients were taken with the knees in conventional full extension and 15°, 30°, and 45° of flexion with weight bearing. Three orthopedic surgeons independently measured the JSW and IMD at the narrowest point and the midpoint of medial tibial plateau using a computer-assisted method.

Results

The JSW and IMD were smallest at 15° flexion, both measured at the narrowest point and the midpoint of the medial compartment. Reproducibility of the IMD at the midpoint was better than at the narrowest point for all four flexion angles.

Conclusion

Measurements of the medial JSW and IMD are smallest at 15° of knee flexion indicating that radiographs should be obtained at this angle in order to best demonstrate the extent of osteoarthritis.

Keywords

Joint space width Osteoarthritis Knee Reproducibility Radiograph 

References

  1. 1.
    Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld J-P, Waterton JC, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006;14: A46–A75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koo S, Gold GE, Andriacchi TP. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. Osteoarthr Cartil 2005;13: 782–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kornaat PR, Ceulemans RY, Kroon HM, et al. MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)—inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system. Skeletal Radiol 2005;34: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lesquesne M, Brandt K, Bellamy N, et al. Guidelines for testing slow-acting and disease modifying drugs in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1994;21 Suppl 41; 65–71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altman RD, Howell DS. Disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds. Osteoarthritis. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1998: 417–428.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verbruggen G, Goemaere S, Veys EM. Chondroitin sulfate: S/DMOAD (structure/disease modifying anti-osteoarthritis drug) in the treatment of finger joint OA. Osteoarthr Cartil 1998;6 Suppl A: 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Dieppe PA, Doherty M, Katz BP, Lane KA. Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and X-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposteior knee radiograph. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44: 1789–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buckland-Wright C. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: comparison between b existing methodologies. Osteoarthr Cartil 1999;7: 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Buckwalter KA, Lequesne M. Pitfalls in the accurate measurement of joint space narrowing in semiflexed, anteroposterior radiographic imaging of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: 2508–2515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cicuttini F, Hankin J, Jones G, Wluka A. Comparison of conventional standing knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing progression of tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2005;13: 722–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Buckwalter KA, Lane KA, Katz BP. Field test of the reproducibility of the semiflexed metatarsophalangeal view in repeated radiographic examinations of subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buckland-Wright JC, Wolfe F, Ward RJ, Flowers N, Hayne C. Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views. J Rheumatol 1999;26: 2664–2674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duddy J, Kirwan JR, Szebenyi B, Clarke S, Granell R, Volkov S. A comparison of the semiflexed (MTP) view with the standing extended view (SEV) in the radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis in a busy routine X-ray department. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44: 349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Buckwalter KA. Detection of radiographic joint space narrowing in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal comparison of the metatarsophalangeal and semiflexed anteroposterior views. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48: 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamanaka N, Takahashi T, Ichikawa N, Yamamoto H. Posterior–anterior weight-bearing radiograph in 15° knee flexion in medial osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32: 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16: 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davies AP, Calder DA, Marshall T, Glasgow MMS. Plain radiography in the degenerated knee. A case for change. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81-B: 632–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, Coward DB, Scott SM. The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70-A: 1479–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Auleley GR, et al. Variability in knee radiographing: implication for definition of radiological progression in medial knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57: 624–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buckland-Wright JC, Ward RJ, Peterfy C, Mojcik CF, Leff RL. Reproducibility of the semiflexed (metatarsophalangeal) radiographic knee position and automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width in a multicenter clinical trial of knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2004;31: 1588–1597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Auleley GR, et al. Radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis: reproducibility and sensitivity to change. J Rheumatol 1996;23: 1756–1764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu TW, O’Connor JJ. Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-bearing structures crossing the human knee joint: comparison between theory and experiment. J Anat 1996;189: 575–585.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Lane KA, Katz BP. Knee pain reduces joint space width in conventional standing anteroposterior radiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46: 1223–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piperno M, Le Graverand M-PH, Conrozier T, Bochu M, Mathieu P, Vignon E. Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femorotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radiographic views. Osteoarthr Cartil 1998;6: 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vignon E, Piperno M, Le Graverand MP, et al. Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48: 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test–retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32: 128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Conrozier T, Mathieu P, Piperno M, et al. Selection of knee radiographs for trials of structure-modifying drugs in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, longitudinal study of Lyon Schuss knee radiographs with the definition of adequate alignment of the medial tibial plateau. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52: 1411–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ravaud P, Chastang C, Auleley GR, et al. Assessment of joint space width in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a comparison of 4 measuring instruments. J Rheumatol 1996;23: 1749–1755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Buckland-Wright JC, et al. Field test of the reproducibility of automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width derived from standardized knee radiographs. J Rheumatol 1999;26: 1359–1365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Williams SA, Ward RJ. Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54: 872–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gold GE, Burstein D, Dardzinski B, Lang P, Boada F, Mosher T. MRI of articular cartilage in OA: novel pulse sequences and compositional/functional markers. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006;14: A76–A86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiaki Takahashi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norio Yamanaka
    • 2
  • Masahiko Ikeuchi
    • 2
  • Haruyasu Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bone and Joint SurgeryEhime University Graduate School of MedicineToonJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics, Kochi Medical SchoolKochi UniversityNankokuJapan

Personalised recommendations