Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 569–572 | Cite as

Use of digital tomosynthesis: case report of a suspected scaphoid fracture and technique

  • Koen Mermuys
  • Karen Vanslambrouck
  • Jean Goubau
  • Luc Steyaert
  • Jan W. Casselman
Case Report

Abstract

Digital tomosynthesis is a relatively new technique for producing an arbitrary number of slice images generated retrospectively from a sequence of projections acquired during a single motion of the X-ray tube. Tomosynthesis has already been described for mammographic and thoracic applications to reduce overlap of tissues. We present a case of a 19-year-old man with a suspected scaphoid fracture in which we used digital tomosynthesis to confirm the diagnosis and thus excluded the need for other imaging modalities. We also describe the technique and background of tomosynthesis with possible future indications for this new promising technique.

Keywords

Scaphoid bone Fractures Bone Tomosynthesis Digital radiography Methods 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Gerhard Brunst, PhD, advanced applications manager of GE Medical Systems Deutschland, for assistance with the technical input.

References

  1. 1.
    Kozin SH. Incidence, mechanism, and natural history of scaphoid fractures. Hand Clin 2001; 17: 515–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breitenseher MJ, Gaebler C. Trauma of the wrist. Eur J Radiol 1997; 25: 129–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tiel-van Buul MM, Broekhuizen TH, van Beek EJ, Bossuyt PM. Choosing a strategy for the diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 45–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lozano-Calderón S, Blazar P, Zurakowski D, Lee SG, Ring D. Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement with radiography and computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2695–2703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Memarsadeghi M, Breitenseher MJ, Schaefer-Prokop C, et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2006; 240: 169–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorsay TA, Major NM, Helms CA. Cost-effectiveness of immediate MR imaging versus traditional follow-up for revealing radiographically occult scaphoid fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 1257–1263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park JM, Franken EA, Garg M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT. Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics 2007; 27: S231–S240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J III, Tourassi GD, Ravin CE. Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology 2006; 241: 663–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dias JJ, Thompson J, Barton NJ, Gregg PJ. Suspected scaphoid fractures. The value of radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 98–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breitenseher MJ, Metz VM, Gilula LA, et al. Radiographically occult scaphoid fractures: value of MR imaging in detection. Radiology 1997; 203: 245–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chakravarty D, Sloan J, Brenchley J. Risk reduction through skeletal scintigraphy as a screening tool in suspected scaphoid fracture: a literature review. Emerg Med J 2002; 19: 507–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobbins JT III, Godfrey DJ. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: R65–R106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koen Mermuys
    • 1
  • Karen Vanslambrouck
    • 1
  • Jean Goubau
    • 2
  • Luc Steyaert
    • 1
  • Jan W. Casselman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyAZ St.-Jan HospitalBrugesBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyAZ St.-Jan HospitalBrugesBelgium

Personalised recommendations