Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum

  • Marc J. Lee
  • Kambiz MotamediEmail author
  • Kira Chow
  • Leanne L. Seeger
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of fat-suppressed gradient-recalled echo (GRE) compared with conventional spin echo T1-weighted (T1W) sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating labral tears.

Materials and methods

Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR arthrograms performed over a 12-month period for which surgical correlation was available. Of 180 serial arthrograms, 31 patients had surgery with a mean of 48 days following imaging. Paired coronal oblique and axial T1W or GRE sequences were analyzed by consensus for labral tear (coronal oblique two-dimensional multi-echo data image combination, 2D MEDIC; and axial three-dimensional double-echo steady-state, 3D DESS; Siemens MAGNETOM Sonata 1.5-T MR system). Interpretations were correlated with operative reports.

Results

Of 31 shoulders, 25 had labral tears at surgery. The GRE sequences depicted labral tears in 22, while T1W images depicted tears in 16 (sensitivity 88% versus 64%; p < 0.05). Subdividing the labrum, GRE was significantly more sensitive for the posterior labrum (75% versus 25%; p < 0.05) with a trend toward greater sensitivity at the anterior labrum (78% versus 56%; p = 0.157) but not significantly different for the superior labrum (50% versus 57%; p > 0.7). Specificities were somewhat lower for GRE.

Conclusion

Thin section GRE sequences are more sensitive than T1W for the detection of anterior and posterior labral tears. As the specificity of GRE was lower, it should be considered as an adjunctive imaging sequence that may improve depiction of labral tears, particularly smaller tears, in routine MR arthrography protocols.

Keywords

Shoulder MR arthrography Magnetic resonance Pulse sequences Labrum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank James Sayre, PhD for advice and assistance with the statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Chaipat L, Palmer WE. Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25: 371–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jbara M, Chen Q, Marten P, Morcos M, Beltran J. Shoulder MR arthrography: how, why, when. Radiol Clin N Am 2005; 43: 683–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shankman S, Bencardino J, Beltran J. Glenohumeral instability: evaluation using MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28: 365–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gusmer PB, Potter HG, Schatz JA, et al. Labral Injuries: accuracy of detection with unenhanced MR imaging of the shoulder. Radiology 1996; 200: 519–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennett BM. On tests for equality of predictive values for t diagnostic procedures. Stat Med 1985; 4: 535–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett BM. On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures. Biometrics 1972; 28: 793–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardino T, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 1229–1235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155: 829–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1994; 190: 645–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL. Anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic criteria determined from prospective analysis of 121 MR arthrograms. Radiology 1995; 197: 819–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Applegate GR, Hewitt M, Snyder SJ, Watson E, Kwak S, Resnick D. Chronic labral tears: value of magnetic resonance arthrography in evaluating the glenoid labrum and labral-bicipital complex. Arthroscopy 2004; 209: 959–963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, et al. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2000; 214: 267–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, Matheny JM, Ruwe PA, Daigneault JP. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology 2001; 218: 127–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee JHE, Van Raalte V, Malian V. Diagnosis of SLAP lesions with Grashey-view arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32: 388–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waldt S, Burkart A, Lange P, Imhoff AB, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K. Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior lesions of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1271–1278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waldt S, Burkart A, Imhoff AB, Bruegel M, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K. Anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of MR arthrography in the classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous injuries. Radiology 2005; 237: 578–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahin G, Demirtas M. An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on current technique and applicational hints and tips. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 416–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wutke R, Fellner FA, Fellner C, Stangl R, Dobritz M, Bautz WA. Direct MR arthrography of the shoulder: 2D vs. 3D gradient-echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 1183–1191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCauley TR, Pope CF, Jokl P. Normal and abnormal glenoid labrum: assessment with multiplanar gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 183: 35–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loredo R, Longo C, Salonen D, et al. Glenoid labrum: MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196: 33–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gobezie R, Warner JJP. SLAP lesion: what is it...really? Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36: 379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc J. Lee
    • 1
  • Kambiz Motamedi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kira Chow
    • 1
  • Leanne L. Seeger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations