Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 173–175 | Cite as

Baastrup’s disease (kissing spine) demonstrated by FDG PET/CT

  • Eugene LinEmail author
Case Report

Abstract

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is a widely used imaging modality in cancer patients. However, there are many potential non-neoplastic causes of FDG uptake. We report a case of FDG uptake between the spinous processes, secondary to Baastrup’s disease. Knowledge of this pattern of uptake is helpful in diagnosing Baastrup’s disease and avoiding false-positive diagnoses.

Keywords

Positron emission tomography Fluorodeoxyglucose Baastrup’s disease Spine 

References

  1. 1.
    Nakamoto Y, Cohade C, Tatsumi M et al. CT appearance of bone metastases detected with FDG PET as part of the same PET/CT examination. Radiology 2005; 237(2): 627–634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gorospe L, Raman S, Echeveste J et al. Whole-body PET/CT: spectrum of physiological variants, artifacts and interpretative pitfalls in cancer patients. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26(8): 671–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohdiewicz PG, Wong CY, Kondas D, Gaskill M, Dworkin HJ. High predictive value of F-18 FDG PET patterns of the spine for metastases or benign lesions with good agreement between readers. Clin Nucl Med 2003; 28: 966–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A et al. Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 279–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen RS, Fayad L, Wahl RL. Increased 18F-FDG uptake in degenerative disease of the spine: characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006; 47(8): 1274–1280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Resnick D. Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column. Radiology 1985; 156: 3–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bywaters EG, Evans S. The lumbar interspinous bursae and Baastrup’s syndrome: an autopsy study. Rheumatol Int 1982; 2: 87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beks JW. Kissing spines: fact or fancy? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989; 100: 134–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brailsford JF. Deformities of the lumbo-sacral regions of the spine. Br J Surg 1929; 16: 562–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hazlett J. Kissing spines. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46A: 1368–1369.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen CK, Yeh L, Resnick D et al. Intraspinal posterior epidural cysts associated with Baastrup’s disease: report of 10 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 191–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhuang H, Alavi A. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med 2002; 32: 47–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamlin LM, Delaplain CB. Bone SPECT in Baastrup’s disease. Clin Nucl Med 1994; 19: 640–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyVirginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations