Semiautomated digital analysis of knee joint space width using MR images
- 114 Downloads
The goal of this study was to (a) develop a semiautomated computer algorithm to measure knee joint space width (JSW) from magnetic resonance (MR) images using standard imaging techniques and (b) evaluate the reproducibility of the algorithm.
Using a standard clinical imaging protocol, bilateral knee MR images were obtained twice within a 2-week period from 17 asymptomatic research participants. Images were analyzed to determine the variability of the measurements performed by the program compared with the variability of manual measurements.
Measurement variability of the computer algorithm was considerably smaller than the variability of manual measurements. The average difference between two measurements of the same slice performed with the computer algorithm by the same user was 0.004 ± 0.07 mm for the tibiofemoral joint (TF) and 0.009 ± 0.11 mm for the patellofemoral joint (PF) compared with an average of 0.12 ± 0.22 mm TF and 0.13 ± 0.29 mm PF, respectively, for the manual method. Interuser variability of the computer algorithm was also considerably smaller, with an average difference of 0.004 ± 0.1 mm TF and 0.0006 ± 0.1 mm PF compared with 0.38 ± 0.59 mm TF and 0.31 ± 0.66 mm PF obtained using a manual method. The between-day reproducibility was larger but still within acceptable limits at 0.09 ± 0.39 mm TF and 0.09 ± 0.51 mm PF. This technique has proven consistently reproducible on a same slice base,while the reproducibility comparing different acquisitions of the same subject was larger. Longitudinal reproducibility improvement needs to be addressed through acquisition protocol improvements.
A semiautomated method for measuring knee JSW from MR images has been successfully developed.
KeywordsJoint space width Digital analysis Osteoarthritis MRI
This study was funded by a grant from NIH (NIAMS R01 AR 48768).
- 4.Harrington IJ. Static and dynamic loading patterns in knee joints with deformities. J Bone Joing Surg 1983;65-A:247–59.Google Scholar
- 7.Bennet GA, Waine HW, Bauer W. Changes in the joint at various ages with particular reference to the nature and development of degenerative joint disease. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1942.Google Scholar
- 12.Schmidt JE, Amrami KK, Manduca A, Kaufman KR. Semi-automated digital image analysis of joint space width in knee radiographs. Skelet Radiol 2005;34:639–43Google Scholar
- 13.Grochowski SJ, Amrami KK, Kaufman K. Semi-automated digital image analysis of patellofemoral joint space width from lateral knee radiographs. Skelet Radiol 2005;34:644–8Google Scholar
- 17.Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307.Google Scholar
- 19.Bruyere O, Genant HK, Kothari M, Zaim S, White DE, Peterfy CG, Burlet N, Richy F, Ethgen D, Montague T, Dabrowski C, Reginster JY. Longitudinal study of magnetic resonance imaging and standard x-rays to assess disease progression in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 21.Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, Fine JB, DeSmet A. Correlation between radiographic findings of osteoarthritis and arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration within the patellofemoral joint. Skelet Radiol 2006; 35(12):895–902.Google Scholar