Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Efficacy of MRI in classifying proximal focal femoral deficiency

  • 299 Accesses

  • 19 Citations

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of MRI in classifying PFFD and to compare MRI to radiographic classification of PFFD.

Design

Radiographic and MRI classification of the cases was performed utilizing the Amstutz classification system.

Patients

Retrospective evaluation of radiographs and MRI exams in nine hips of eight patients with proximal focal femoral deficiency was performed by two radiologists.

Results

The cases were classified by radiographs as Amstutz 1: n=3, Amstutz 3: n=3, Amstutz 4: n=1 and Amstutz 5: n=2. The classifications based on MRI were Amstutz 1: n=6, Amstutz 2: n=1, Amstutz 3: n=0, Amstutz 4: n=2 and Amstutz 5: n=0. Three hips demonstrated complete agreement. There were six discordant hips. In two of the discordant cases, follow-up radiographs of 6 months or greater intervals were available and helped to confirm MRI findings. Errors in radiographic evaluation consisted of overestimating the degree of deficiency.

Conclusion

MRI is more accurate than radiographic evaluation for the classification of PFFD, particularly early on, prior to the ossification of cartilaginous components in the femurs. Since radiographic evaluation tends to overestimate the degree of deficiency, MRI is a more definitive modality for evaluation of PFFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Johansson E, Apirisi T. Missing cruciate ligament in congenital short femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1983;65A:1109–15.

  2. 2.

    Panting AL, Williams PF. Proximal focal femoral deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 1978;60:46–52.

  3. 3.

    Bailey JA, Beightin P. Bilateral femoral dysgenesis. Clin Pediatr 1970;9:668–74.

  4. 4.

    Hillman JS, Mesgarzadeh M, Revesz G, Bonakdarpour A, Clancy M, Betz R. Proximal femoral focal deficiency: radiologic analysis of anaysis of 49 cases. Radiology 1987;165:769–73.

  5. 5.

    Epps CH Jr. Current concepts review: proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1983;65:867–70.

  6. 6.

    Krajbich I. Proximal femoral focal deficiency. In: Kalamchi A (ed) Congenital lower limb deficiencies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York 1989;108–27.

  7. 7.

    Ponseti IV. Growth and development of the acetabulum in the normal child: Anatomical, histological, and roentgenographic studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(5):575–85, Jul.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to T. Y. Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maldjian, C., Patel, T.Y., Klein, R.M. et al. Efficacy of MRI in classifying proximal focal femoral deficiency. Skeletal Radiol 36, 215–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0218-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Femur
  • Deficiency
  • Congenital
  • Hip
  • MRI