Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 12, pp 929–934 | Cite as

Rotational profile of the lower extremity in achondroplasia: computed tomographic examination of 25 patients

  • Hae-Ryong Song
  • Abi-Turab Choonia
  • Suk Joo HongEmail author
  • Seok-Hyun Lee
  • Seung-Woo Suh
  • In Ho Cha
  • Jong-Tae Park
Scientific Article



To evaluate lower-extremity rotational abnormalities in subjects with achondroplasia using computed tomography (CT) scans.

Materials and methods

CT scans were performed in 25 subjects with achondroplasia (13 skeletally immature, mean age 8.7 years; 12 skeletally mature, mean age 17.6 years). In a total of 50 bilateral limbs, CT images were used to measure the angles of acetabular anteversion, femoral anteversion, and tibial external torion. Measurement was performed by three examiners and then repeated by one examiner. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were analyzed, and results were compared with previously reported normal values.


Mean values for skeletally immature and skeletally mature subjects were 13.6±7.5° and 21.5±6.4° respectively for acetabular anteversion, 27.1±20.8° and 30.5±20.1° for femoral torsion, and 21.6±10.6° and 22.5±10.8° for tibial torsion. Intra- and interobserver agreements were good to excellent. Acetabular anteversion and femoral anteversion in skeletally mature subjects were greater than normal values in previous studies. Both skeletally immature and mature subjects with achondroplasia had decreased tibial torsion compared to normal skeletally immature and mature subjects.


Lower-extremity rotational abnormalities in subjects with achondroplasia include decreased tibial external torsion in both skeletally immature and mature subjects, as well as increased femoral and acetabular anteversion in skeletally mature subjects.


Achondroplasia Computed tomography (CT) Femur Tibia 


  1. 1.
    Paley D, Tetsworth K. Mechanical axis deviation of lower limbs: Preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia. Clin Orthop 1992;280:65–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turner MS. The association between tibial torsion and knee joint pathology. Clin Orthop 1994;302:47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herzenberg JE, Smith JD, Paley D. Correcting torsion deformities with Ilizarov’s apparatus. Clin Orthop 1991;302:36–41.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herzenberg JE, Waanders NA. Calculating rate and duration of distraction for deformity correction with the Ilizarov technique. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:601–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delgado WD, Schoenecker PL, Rich MM, Capelli RN. Treatment of severe malalignment syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:484–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss C, King H. Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Staheli LT. Torsion-treatment indications. Clin Orthop 1989;247:61–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stuberg W, Temme J, Kaplan P, Clarke A, Fuchs R. Measurement of tibial torsion and thigh-foot angle using goniometry and computed tomography. Clin Orthop 1991;272:208–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim SS, Frick SL, Wenger DR. Anteversion of the acetabulum in developmental dysplasia of the hip. analysis with computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:438–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacquemier M, Jouve JL, Bolllini G, Panu M, Migliani R. Acetabular anteversion in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1992;12:373–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1169–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laasonen EM, Jokio P, Lindholm TS. Tibial torsion measured by computed tomography. Acta Radiol 1984;25:325–29.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seber S, Hazer B, Kose N, Gokturk E, Gunal I, Turgut A. Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle. computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120:255–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yagi T, Sasaki T. Tibial torsion in patients with medial-type osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop 1986;213:177–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moussa M. Rotational malalignment and femoral torsion in osteoarthritic knees with patellofemoral joint involvement. A CT scan study. Clin Orthop 1994;304:176–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fabry G, Cheng LX, Molenaers G. Normal and abnormal torsional development in children. Clin Orthop 1994;302:22–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kristiansen LP, Gunderson RB, Steen H, Reikeras O. The normal development of tibial torsion. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:519–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valmassy R, Stanton B. Tibial torsion. Normal values in children. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1989:79;432–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jend HH, Heller M, Dallek M, Schoettle H. Measurement of tibial torsion by computer tomography. Acta Radiol 1981;22:271–76.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ponseti IV. Skeletal growth in achondroplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:701–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hae-Ryong Song
    • 1
  • Abi-Turab Choonia
    • 3
  • Suk Joo Hong
    • 2
    • 6
    Email author
  • Seok-Hyun Lee
    • 4
  • Seung-Woo Suh
    • 1
  • In Ho Cha
    • 2
  • Jong-Tae Park
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rare Diseases InstituteKorea University Guro HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKorea University Guro HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryLaud ClinicMumbaiIndia
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDongguk University Ilsan Buddist HospitalGoyangSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of Occupational and Enviornmental MedicineKorea University Ansan HospitalAnsanSouth Korea
  6. 6.Department of RadiologyKorea University Guro HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations