Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 12, pp 916–922

Pellegrini–Stieda disease: a heterogeneous disorder not synonymous with ossification/calcification of the tibial collateral ligament—anatomic and imaging investigation

  • Luiz F. A. Mendes
  • Michael L. Pretterklieber
  • Jae H. Cho
  • Glenn M. Garcia
  • Donald L. Resnick
  • Christine B. Chung
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

Ossification/calcification around the medial femoral condyle has been known as Pellegrini–Stieda (PS) disease for almost 100 years. Little attention has been given to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics. Our purpose is to demonstrate the anatomy in the medial femoral compartment and imaging findings of PS disease, determining the sites and patterns of ossification.

Design and patients

In a cadaveric study seven specimens were dissected to show the anatomic relations of the tibial collateral ligament (TCL) and the tendon of the ischiocondylar part of the adductor magnus muscle, in the medial femoral epicondyle. In order to determine the nature of ossification/calcification in PS disease, MR imaging and radiographic findings in nine patients were analyzed by two observers with attention to the specific site, shape, and orientation of the ossification and its relationship to the tibial collateral ligament (TCL) and adductor magnus tendon. Available clinical history was recorded. A classification system addressing different sites and patterns of ossification was developed.

Results

The anatomic study showed that the TCL and the adductor magnus tendon insert at different sites in the medial femoral condyle and there is no continuation; however, some fibers of the posterior bundle of the TCL overlap the anterior aspect of the adductor magnus tendon. The imaging study showed that shape, orientation, and location of the abnormal calcification and ossification were similar on radiographic and MR imaging analysis. Ossification had an inferior orientation in six cases, a superior orientation in two cases, and both in one case. Four patterns of ossification were noted: (I) a beak-like appearance with an inferior orientation and femoral attachment was present in five cases; (II) a drop-like appearance with an inferior orientation, parallel to the femur, was evident in one case; (III) an elongated appearance with a superior orientation, parallel to the femur, was seen in two cases; and (IV) a beak-like appearance with an inferior and superior orientation, attached to the femur, was seen in one case. The ossification was present in the TCL in six cases, in the adductor magnus tendon in two cases, and in both in one case. The coronal plane was best in detecting and categorizing the ossification.

Conclusion

Our data indicate that ossification in PS disease is not confined to the TCL but may also involve the adductor magnus tendon. In some cases, it can be related to the anatomic proximity (overlap) of the fibers of these two structures. PS disease should not be regarded as synonymous with ossification of the TCL. The ossification may be classified into four types. No clinical differences among these types appear to exist.

Keywords

Pellegrini–Stieda disease Medial collateral ligament lesion Tendon of the adductor magnus muscle Heterotopic ossification Knee MR imaging Knee anatomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang JC, Shapiro MS. Pellegrini-Stieda syndrome. Am J Orthop 1995;493–97.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niitsu M, Ikeda K, Iijima T, Ochiai N, Noguchi M, Itai Y. MR imaging in Pellegrini-Stieda disease. Radiat Med 1999;17(6):405–09.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finder JG. Calcification of the tibial collateral ligament: a report of forty-two cases.J Am Med Assoc 1934;102:1373–75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Resnick D, Kang HS. Knee. In: Resnick D, Kang HS, editors. Internal derangements of joints: emphasis on MR imaging. 1st edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1997. pp. 555–785.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mink JH. The cruciate and collateral ligaments. In: Mink JH, Crues III JV, Reicher MA, Deutsch A, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press; 1992. pp. 141–88.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schweitzer ME, Tran D, Deely DM, Hume EL. Medial collateral ligament injuries: evalution of multiple signs, prevalence and location of associated bone bruises, and assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:825–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kulowski J. Post-traumatic para-articular ossification of the knee joint (Pellegrini-Stieda’s disease). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 1942;47:392–404.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frohse F, Fraenkel M. Die Muskeln des menschlichen Beines. In: Bardeleben K, editors. Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, vol II 2.2B. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1913;526–8, 536–42, 557–61, 644–52.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, et al. Gray’s anatomy. 38th edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. pp. 703, 875, 884.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aiello L, Dean C. An introduction to human evolutionary anatomy. London: Academic Press; 1994. p. 414.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howell AB, Straus WL. The muscular system. In: Hartman CG, Straus WL, editors. The anatomy of the rhesus monkey. New York: Hafner; 1971. pp. 89–175.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ribbing L. Die Muskeln und Nerven der Extremitaeten. In: Bolk L, Goeppert E, Kallius E, Lubosch W, editors. Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1938. vol 5, pp. 543–656.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zuckerkandl E. Zur Anatomie von Chiromys Madagascarensis. Denkschr Akad Wiss Wien, Math-Naturwiss Klasse 1899;68:1–112.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergman RA, Thompson SA, Afifi AK, Saadeh FA. Compendium of human anatomic variation. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1988. p. 24, 26.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frey H. Der Musculus triceps surae in der Primatenreihe. Gegenbaur’s Morphol Jahrb 1913;47:1–192.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macalister A. Additional observations on muscular anomalies in human anatomy (3rd series), with a catalogue of the principal muscular variations hitherto published. Trans R Irish Acad 1871;25:1–134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pellegrini A. Ossificazione traumatica del legamento collaterale tibiale dell’articulazione del ginocchio sinistro. La Clinica Moderna 1905;433–39.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stieda A. Ueber eine typische Verletzung am unteren Femurende. Arch Klin Chir 1908:815–26.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andreesen R. Ueber den Stiedaschen Begleitschatten am inneren Oberschenkelknorren. Arch Klin Chir 1933;162–71.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pellegrini A. Ossificazioni post-traumatiche pararticolari(O.P.P.) Arch Ital Chir 1938;53:501–63.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulowski J. Pellegrini-Stieda’s disease: a report of one case surgically treated. J Am Med Assoc 1933;100:1014–17.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nachlas IW, Olpp JL. Para-articular calcification (Pellegrini-Stieda) in affections of the knee. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945;81:206–12.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Puzzas JE, Miller MD, Rosier RN. Pathologic bone formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;19:269–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luiz F. A. Mendes
    • 1
  • Michael L. Pretterklieber
    • 2
  • Jae H. Cho
    • 1
  • Glenn M. Garcia
    • 1
  • Donald L. Resnick
    • 1
  • Christine B. Chung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyVeterans Administration Medical CenterSan Diego USA
  2. 2.Center of Anatomy and Cell BiologyDepartment of Applied AnatomyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations