Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, 35:641 | Cite as

Relationship between low back pain, disability, MR imaging findings and health care provider

  • Estanislao AranaEmail author
  • Luis Martí-Bonmatí
  • María Vega
  • Daniel Bautista
  • Enrique Mollá
  • Salvador Costa
  • Rubén Montijano
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

To determine the association between the self-report of pain and disability and findings on lumbar MR images, and to compare two different health care providers in Spanish patients with low back pain (LBP).

Design

Cross-sectional

Material and methods

A total of 278 patients, 137 men and 141 women aged 44±14 years submitted with low back pain (LBP) were studied. One hundred and nine patients were from the National Health System (NHS) and 169 from private practice. Patients with previous discitis, surgery, neoplasm or traumatic episodes were excluded. Every patient completed a disability questionnaire with six core items, providing a score of disability from 2 to 28. All patients had sagittal spin-echo T1 and turbo spin-echo T2, axial proton-density and MR myelography weighted images. MR images of the two most affected disc levels were read, offering an MR imaging score from 0 to 30.

Results

Patients with a combination of LBP and sciatica showed the highest levels of disability (p=0.002). MR imaging scores only correlated with pain interference with normal work (p=0.04), but not with other disability questions. Patients from the NHS showed greater disability scores than private ones (p=0.001) and higher MR imaging scores (p=0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with LBP, MR imaging only correlates with pain interference with work but not with other disability questions. Differences are found between private and NHS patients, the latter being more physically affected.

Keywords

MR imaging Lumbar spine Quality of life Low back pain Questionnaire Spanish version Health care provider Disc degeneration 

References

  1. 1.
    Espeland A, Albrektsen G, Larsen JL. Plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine. An audit of referrals from general practitioners. Acta Radiol 1999;40:52–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beattie PF, Meyers SP, Stratford P, Millard RW, Hollenberg GM. Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2000;25:819–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollingworth W, Dixon AK, Todd CJ, et al. Self reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 1998;7:369–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacGregor AJ, Andrew T, Sambrook PN, Spector TD. Structural, psychological, and genetic influences on low back and neck pain: a study of adult female twins. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:160–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Videman T, Battié MC, Gibbons LE, Maravilla KR, Manninen H, Kaprio J. Associations between back pain history and lumbar MRI findings. Spine 2003;28:582–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Tervonen O et al. Severity of symptoms and signs in relation to magnetic resonance imaging findings among sciatic patients. Spine 2001;26:E149–E154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jarvik JJ, Hollingworth W, Heagerty P, Haynor DR, Deyo RA. The longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBack) study. Spine 2001;26:1158–1166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998;23:2003–2013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leino-Arjas P, Hänninen K, Puska P. Socioeconomic variation in back and joint pain in Finland. Eur J Epidemiol 1998;14:79–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Lenthe FJ, Schrijvers CT, Droomers M, Joung IM, Louwman MJ, Mackenbach JP. Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health: the Dutch GLOBE study. Eur J Public Health 2004;14:63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodríguez M. El espacio de los seguros privados en los sistemas sanitarios públicos: marco conceptual y políticas. Gac Sanit 2001;15:527–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madan SS, Boeree NR. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 2003;12:567–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. Spine 1995;20:1257–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 2001;26:E93–E113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Ohnari H, Takino T, Tomita K. Schmorl’s nodes and low-back pain. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J 1995;4:56–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jensen MC, Kelly AP, Brant-Zawadzki MN. MRI of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Q 1994;10:173–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1992;65:361–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mounce K. Back pain. Rheumatology 2002;41:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal HJ, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiological features. Spine 1995;20:1178–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rantanen P. Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain. J Rehab Med 2001;33:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Porchet F, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Daeppen K, Villemure JG, Vader JP. Relationship between severity of lumbar disc disease and disability scores in sciatica patients. Neurosurgery 2002;50:1253–1260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dionne CE, Von Korff M, Koepsell TD, et al. Formal education and back pain: a review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:455–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leino-Arjas P, Kaila-Kangas L, Keskimäki I, Notkola V, Mutanen P. Impatient hospital care for lumbar intervertebral disc disorders in Finland in relation to education, occupational class, income, and employment. Public Health 2002;116:272–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:586–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McNally EG, Wilson DJ, Ostlere SJ. Limited magnetic resonance imaging in low back pain instead of plain radiographs: experience with first 1000 cases. Clin Radiol 2001;56:922–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B, Padua R, Romanini E. Pain in low back-pain. Problems in measuring outcomes in musculoskeletal disorders. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2002;305:54–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haig AJ, Weiner JB, Tew J, Quint J, Yamakawa K. The relation among spinal geometry on MRI, paraspinal electromyographic abnormalities, and age in persons refferred for electrodiagnostic testing of low back symptoms. Spine 2002;27:1918–1925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003;12:12–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J et al. Painful lumbar disk derangement: Relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 2001;218:420–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW. Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 end-plate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1574–1581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mackenzie R, Dixon AK. Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 1995;50:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estanislao Arana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis Martí-Bonmatí
    • 1
    • 2
  • María Vega
    • 2
  • Daniel Bautista
    • 3
  • Enrique Mollá
    • 1
  • Salvador Costa
    • 1
  • Rubén Montijano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyClínica QuirónValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHospital Universitario Dr. PesetValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Preventive MedicineHospital Universitario Dr. PesetValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations