Environmental Geology

, 57:749

Gravity data as a tool for landfill study

  • João B. C. Silva
  • Wlamir A. Teixeira
  • Valéria C. F. Barbosa
Original Article


This paper shows the potential of gravity data to map a buried landfill bottom topography. To this end, a gravity inversion method is presented for estimating the landfill’s bottom depths at discrete points assuming a decrease of the density contrast with depth according to a hyperbolic law. The method’s efficiency was tested using synthetic data from simulated waste landfills, producing estimated bottom topographies very close to the true ones. The method’s potentiality has been further evaluated in applying it to the gravity data from the abandoned Thomas Farm Landfill site, Indiana, USA, whose bottom topography is known. The estimated topography showed close agreement with the known Thomas Farm Landfill’s bottom topography.


Waste Landfill Gravity inversion Landfill’s lower boundary Variable density contrast Smoothing stabilizer 


  1. Angoran Y, Madden TR (1977) Induced-polarization—a preliminary study of its chemical basis. Geophysics 42:788–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbosa VCF, Menezes PTL, Silva JBC (2007) Gravity data as a tool for detecting faults: in-depth enhancement of subtle Almada’s basement faults, Brazil. Geophysics 72:B59–B68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa VCF, Silva JBC, Medeiros WE (1997) Gravity inversion of basement relief using approximate equality constraints on depth. Geophysics 62:1745–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa VCF, Silva JBC, Medeiros WE (1999) Gravity inversion of a discontinuous relief stabilized by weighted smoothness constraints on depth. Geophysics 64:1429–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beamish D, Mattsson A (2003) Time-lapse airborne EM surveys across a municipal landfill. J Environ Eng Geophys 8:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstone C, Dahlin T, Ohlsson T, Hogland W (2000) DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: two pre-excavation surveys. Environ Geol 39:360–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Büker F, Green AG, Horstmeyer H (1998) Shallow seismic reflection study of a glaciated valley. Geophysics 63:1395–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buselli G, Barber C, Davis GB, Salama RB (1990) Detection of groundwater contamination near waste disposal sites with transient eletromagnetic and eletrical methods. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environment geophysics, vol 2, Environmental and Groundwater. SEG, Tulsa, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  9. Chambers JE, Kuras O, Meldrum PI, Ogilvy RD, Hollands J (2006) Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste-disposal site. Geophysics 71:B231–B239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Iaco R, Green AG, Maurer HR, Horstmeyer H (2003) A combined seismic reflection and refraction study of a landfill and its host sediments. J Appl Geophys 52:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green AG, Lanz E, Maurer H, Boerner D (1999) A template for geophysical investigations of small landfills. Leading Edge 18:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinze WJ (1990) The role of gravity and magnetic methods in engineering and environmental studies. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics I, review and tutorial. SEG, Tulsa, pp 75–126Google Scholar
  13. Kick IF (1989) Landfill investigations in New England using gravity methods. Symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, pp 339–353Google Scholar
  14. Lanz E, Pugin A, Green A, Horstmeyer H (1996) Results of 2-D and 3-D high-resolution seismic reflection surveying of surficial sediments. Geophys Res Lett 23:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lanz E, Maurer H, Green AG (1998) Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site. Geophysics 63:1414–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Litinsky VA (1989) Concept of effective density: key to gravity determinations for sedimentary basins. Geophysics 54:1474–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 2:601–612Google Scholar
  18. Martinho E, Almeida F (2006) 3D behaviour of contamination in landfill sites using 2D resistivity/IP imaging: case studies in Portugal. Environ Geol 49:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pellerin L, Alumbaugh DL (1997) Tools for electromagnetic investigation of the shallow subsurface. Leading Edge 16:1631–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prezzi C, Orgeira MJ, Ostera H, Vásquez CA (2005) Ground magnetic survey of a municipal solid waste landfill: pilot study in Argentina. Environ Geol 47:889–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rao VC, Chakravarthi V, Raju ML (1994) Forward modelling: gravity anomalies of two-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape with hyperbolic and parabolic density functions. Comput Geosci 20:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts RL, Hinze WJ, Leap DI (1990). Data enhancement procedures on magnetic data from landfill investigations. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, vol 2, Environmental and Groundwater. SEG, Tulsa, pp 261–266Google Scholar
  23. Roberts RL, Hinze WJ, Leap DI (1991) Application of the gravity method to investigation of a landfill in the glaciated midcontinent, U.S.A Invest Geophys 2(5):253–259Google Scholar
  24. Rodriques EB (1987) Application of gravity and seismic methods in hydrogeological mapping at a landfill site in Ontario. First outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods, pp 487–504Google Scholar
  25. Ross HP, Mackelprang CE, Wright TPM (1990) Dipole-dipole electrical resistivity surveys at waste disposal study sites in northern Utah. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, vol 2. SEG, Tulsa, pp 145–153Google Scholar
  26. Silva JBC, Costa DCL, Barbosa VCF (2006) Gravity inversion of basement relief and estimation of density contrast variation with depth. Geophysics 71:J51–J58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silva JBC, Medeiros WE, Barbosa VCF (2001) Pitfalls in nonlinear inversion. Pure Appl Geophys 158:945–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Splajt T, Ferrier G, Frostick LE (2003) Application of ground penetrating radar in mapping and monitoring landfill sites. Environ Geol 44:963–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solutions to Ill-posed problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Zacher G, Tezkan B, Neubauer FM, Hordt A, Muller I (1996) Radiomagnetotellurics, a powerful tool for waste site exploration. Eur J Environ Eng Geophys 1:139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • João B. C. Silva
    • 1
  • Wlamir A. Teixeira
    • 1
  • Valéria C. F. Barbosa
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidade Federal do ParáIG, BelémBrazil
  2. 2.Observatório Nacional, Gal. José CristinoSão CristóvãoBrazil

Personalised recommendations