Environmental Geology

, Volume 56, Issue 7, pp 1449–1459 | Cite as

Determination of geomechanical properties and collapse potential of a caliche by in situ and laboratory tests

Original Article


Working in complex grounds have always been difficult for engineering geologists because of the heterogenous nature of such geo-materials, which results in different behaviors under stresses. The caliches outcropping in the Adana basin and its close vicinity are selected as the study material because of their highly complex nature and also understanding their mechanical behaviour and collapse potential is too difficult, although their aerial extent is large in the region. For this reason, investigation of the collapse potential and mechanical behaviour of the caliches by applying new approaches besides the conventional in situ and laboratory tests is the purpose of the study. The study includes five main stages such as measurements of caliche profiles, in situ tests (plate loading), sampling, shooting photographs for photoanalyses and laboratory studies. Four different levels such as hard pan; silty, sandy layer; gravelly, blocky layer and clayey level are described for the caliches employed. The hard pan level is a weak rock with an average uniaxial compressive strength of 11.89 MPa while the others have typical soil characteristics. A series of plate loading tests are applied on the blocky, gravelly level of the caliche to determine the modulus of elasticity. The modulus of elasticity and the allowable bearing capacity are determined between 28.6–65.3 and 1.5–2.0 MPa, respectively. To determine the grain size distribution curve, in addition to sieve analyses, a photoanalysis technique is also applied and a combination procedure between the results from both sieve analyses and photoanalyses is introduced and the grain size curves for the blocky, gravelly level of the caliche are obtained. According to the results of collapse potential index tests performed on the samples collected from 20 locations of the study area, the soft pan level of the caliche has slight to moderate degree of collapse indices. In the final stage, various simple and statistically meaningful empirical equations are proposed for the indirect determination of the collapse index by employing simple paramateres.


Caliche Adana (Turkey) Plate loading test Collapsible soil Photoanalysis 


  1. ASTM (American Society of Testing and Materials) (1992) Annual book of ASTM standards. 04.08, pp1391–1393Google Scholar
  2. ASTM (1994) Construction In: Annual book of ASTM standards—soil and rock, building stones. 04.08 ASTM Publication, pp 972Google Scholar
  3. BSI (1990) British standard methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Part 7, Shear strength tests (total stress), pp 46Google Scholar
  4. DAD (General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Earthquake Research Department) (1996) Turkey earthquake zonation mapGoogle Scholar
  5. DMI (2003) Annual precipitation and temperature data of Adana in the period of 1961–2001, 13 sGoogle Scholar
  6. Esteban M, Klappa CF (1983) Subaerial exposure environment. In: Scholle PA, Bebout DG, Moore CH (eds) Carbonate depositional environments. Amer Assoc Petrol Geol. Mem 33:1–72Google Scholar
  7. Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gong S, Mii H, Wei K, Horng C, You C, Huang F, Chi W,Yui T, Torng P, Huang S, Wang S, Wu J, Yang K (2005) Dry climate near the Western Pacific warm pool: Pleistocene caliches of the Nansha Islands, South China sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 226:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goudie A (1973) Duricrusts in tropical and subtropical landscapes. Claredon, Oxford, pp 184Google Scholar
  10. Goudie PA, Pye K (1983) Chemical sediments and geomorphology. Academic Press, London, pp 93–131Google Scholar
  11. Harrison RS (1977) Caliche profiles: indicators of near surface subaerial diagenesis. Barbados, West Indies. B Can Petrol Geol 25(1):123–127Google Scholar
  12. ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) (1981) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In: ET Brown (ed) ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 217Google Scholar
  13. Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (2000) Global climatic change and pedogenic carbonates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 305Google Scholar
  14. Lutenegger AJ, Saber RT (1988) Determination of collapse potential of soils. Geotech Test J 11(3):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Machette MN (1985) Calcic soils of the southwestern United States. Geological Society of America, Special Paper No. 203, 1–21Google Scholar
  16. Milnes AR (1992) Calcrete. In: Martini IP, Chesworth W (eds) Weathering, soils and paleosols. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nurlu M (1998) Preliminary report on 27 June 1998 Adana–Ceyhan Earthquake. General Directorate of Disaster Affairs of Turkey, Report No. DEP2, 852/1 (unpublished)Google Scholar
  18. Ozmen B, Nurlu M, Güler H (1997) Coğrafi bilgi sistemi ile deprem bölgelerinin incelemesi. Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını, pp 89 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  19. Rogers CDF (1995) Types and distribution of collapsible soils. In: Derbyshire E, Dijkstra T, Smalley I (eds) Genesis and properties of collapsible soils. NATO ASI Series, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherlands, pp 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scholle PA, Bebout DG, Moore CH (1983) Carbonate depositional environments. American Assoc of Geo Mem 33:2–54Google Scholar
  21. Senol M (1989) Adana-Balcali/Catalan bolgesinin Genc Tersiyer-Kuvaterner istifinin Lito-Pedolojik ve Sedimantolojik incelenmesi.Dissertation, Cukurova University (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  22. Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Medley EW, Tuncay E, Nefeslioglu HA (2006) Estimating the uniaxial compressive strength of a volcanic bimrock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(4):554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. STSC Inc. (1991) Statgraphics: Statistical Procedures Reference Manual (Version 5.0), pp 1750Google Scholar
  24. Yetis C (1978) Adana kuzeyinin jeolojisi ve şehir merkezinin bazı temel sorunlarıa ilişik gözlemler. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Müh-Mim. Fak. Dergisi, vol 12, pp 115–123 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  25. Zorlu K (2003) Investigation of geomechanical properties and internal structure collapse mechanism of the caliches in Adana Industrial Park.Dissertation, University of Hacettepe, Ankara (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  26. Zorlu K, Kasapoglu KE (2004) An empirical approach to estimate internal structure collapse potential of the caliches at Adana region. Yerbilimleri 29:133–141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Engineering, Applied Geology DivisionMersin UniversityMersinTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geological Engineering, Applied Geology DivisionHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations