Environmental Geology

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 1723–1737 | Cite as

A comparative review of hydrologic issues involved in geologic storage of CO2 and injection disposal of liquid waste

Original Article

Abstract

The paper presents a comparison of hydrologic issues and technical approaches used in deep-well injection and disposal of liquid wastes, and those issues and approaches associated with injection and storage of CO2 in deep brine formations. These comparisons have been discussed in nine areas: injection well integrity; abandoned well problems; buoyancy effects; multiphase flow effects; heterogeneity and flow channeling; multilayer isolation effects; caprock effectiveness and hydromechanics; site characterization and monitoring; effects of CO2 storage on groundwater resources. There are considerable similarities, as well as significant differences. Scientifically and technically, these two fields can learn much from each other. The discussions presented in this paper should help to focus on the key scientific issues facing deep injection of fluids. A substantial but by no means exhaustive reference list has been provided for further studies into the subject.

References

  1. Akervoll I, Zweigel P, Lindeberg E (2006) CO2 storage in open, dipping aquifers. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Trondheim, Norway, pp 19–22Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose WA, Lakshminarasimhan S, Holtz MH, Núñez-López V, Hovorka SD, Duncan I (2006) Geologic factors controlling CO2 storage capacity and permanence—techniques and case studies based on experience with heterogeneity in oil and gas reservoirs applied to CO2 storage. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 20–22 March, p 9Google Scholar
  3. Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) (1996) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, 775 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachu S (2000) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers Manage 41:953–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachu S, Gunter WD (1999) Storage capacity of CO2 in geological media in sedimentary basins, with application to the Alberta Basin. In: Eliasson B, Riemer PWF, Wokaun A (eds) Greenhouse gas control technologies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachu S, Gunter WD, Perkins EH (1994) Aquifer disposal of CO2: hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Convers Manage 35:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bachu S, Haug K, Michael K, Buschkuehle BE, Adams JJ (2005) Deep injection of acid gas in Western Canada. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 623–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blasing TJ, Broniak C, Marland G (2005) State-by-state carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use in the United States 1960–2000. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 10:659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brasier F, Kobelski B (1996) Injection of industrial wastes in the United States. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  10. Bundy JD, Fizer LA (1996) Mechanical integrity analysis and evaluation of long-term, low-rate annulus fluid loss in class I waste injection wells In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 211–224Google Scholar
  11. Celia MA, Bachu S, Nordbotten JM, Gasda SE, Dahle HK (2005) Quantitative estimation of CO2 leakage from geological storage: analytical models, numerical models, and data needs. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF (eds) Proceeding greenhouse gas control technologies, vol I, p 663Google Scholar
  12. Celia MA, Kavetski D, Nordbotten JM, Bachu S, Gasda S (2006a) Implications of abandoned wells for site selection. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, pp 20–22Google Scholar
  13. Celia MA, Bachu S, Nordbotten JM, Kavetski D, Gasda S (2006b) A risk assessment modeling tool to quantify leakage potential through wells in mature sedimentary basins. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 19–22 JuneGoogle Scholar
  14. Chadwick RA, Zweigel P, Gregersen U, Kirby GA, Holloway S, Johannessen PN (2004) Geological reservoir characterization of a CO2 storage site: The Utsira Sand, Sleipner, Northern North Sea. Energy 29:1371–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chalaturnyk R, Gunter WD (2005) Geological storage of CO2: time frames, monitoring and verification, In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF (eds) Proceedings of 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, vol I, pp 623–631Google Scholar
  16. Chalbaud C, Robin M, Egermann P (2006) Interfacial tension of brine/CO2 systems at reservoir condition. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies. Trondheim, Norway, pp 19–22Google Scholar
  17. Chang Y-B, Lim MT, Pope GA, Sepehrnoori K (1994) CO2 flow patterns under multiphase flow: field-scale conditions. SPE Reserv Eng 9:208–216Google Scholar
  18. Clark JE, Bonura DK, Van Voorhees RF (2005) An overview of injection well history in the United States of America. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  19. DOE (1999a) Carbon sequestration research and development. In: Reichle D and others (eds) U.S. Dept Energy, Washington, DC, Rep DOE/SC/FE-1Google Scholar
  20. DOE (1999b) Inventory of electric utility power plants in the United States, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Donaldson EC (1964) Surface disposal of industrial wastes in the United States, US Bureau Mines Inf Circ, 8212Google Scholar
  22. Doughty C, Pruess K, Benson SM, Hovorka SD, Green CT (2001) Capacity investigation of brine-bearing sands of the Frio formation for geologic sequestration of CO2. In: Proceedings of 1st national conference on carbon sequestration. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC, pp 14–17Google Scholar
  23. Energy Information Administration (2005) Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (with Projections to 2025). A report published by the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Ennis-King J, Paterson L (2000) Reservoir engineering issues in the geological disposal of carbon dioxide. In: Williams DJ, Durie RA, McMullan P, Paulson CAJ, Smith AY, (eds) Proceedings of 5th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies. Cairns, Australia, pp 290–295Google Scholar
  25. Flett MA, Gurton RM, Taggart IJ (2005) Heterogeneous saline formations: long-term benefits for geo-sequestration of greenhouse gases. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW Gilboy CF (eds) Proceedings of 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, vol I, pp 501–509Google Scholar
  26. Flett M, Gurton R, Weir G (2006) Reservoir performance of disposed carbon dioxide in saline formations: impact of heterogeneity and dip. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, p 281, Trondheim, Norway, 19–22 JuneGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallo YL, Trenty L, Michel A, Vidal-Gilbert S, Parra T, Jeannin L (2006) Long-term flow simulations of CO2 storage in saline aquifer. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, p 284 (2006), Trondheim, Norway, 19–22 JuneGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerard B, Frenette R, Auge L, Barlet-Gouedard V, Desroches J, Jammes L (2006) Well integrity in CO2 environments: performance, risk, and technologies. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 160, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerrish HW, Cooper KJ (1996) Monitoring waste movement at industrial waste disposal well sites. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 433–448Google Scholar
  30. Haidl FM, Whittaker SG, Yurkowski M, Kreis LK, Gilboy CF, Burke RB (2005) The importance of regional geological mapping in CO2 storage site characterization: examples from the IEA Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project, In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF (eds) Proceedings greenhouse gas control technologies, vol I, pp 751–759Google Scholar
  31. Harlow IF (1939) Waste problem of a chemical company. Ind Eng Chem 31:1345–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellström G, Tsang C-F, Claesson J (1988) Combined forced-convection and buoyancy flow at a two-fluid interface in a porous medium: analytical studies. Water Resour Res 24(4):407–515Google Scholar
  33. Hendriks CA, Blok K (1993) Underground storage of carbon dioxide. Energy Convers Manage 34:949–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hovorka SD, Doughty C, Benson SM, Pruess K, Knox PR (2004) The impact of geological heterogeneity on CO2 storage in brine formations: a case study from the Texas Gulf Coast. In: Baines SJ, Worden RH (eds) Geological storage of carbon dioxide, vol 233. Geological Society of London Special Publication, London, UK, pp 147–163Google Scholar
  35. Hsieh PA, Bredehoeft JS (1981) A reservoir analysis of the Denver earthquakes—a case study of induced seismicity. J Geophys Res 86:903–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang L, Fehler M (2006) Detecting faults in the caprock using seismic imaging. In: Proceedings of the CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 43, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  37. IEA (2005) Wellbore Integrity Workshop, October 2005. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report No. 2005/12Google Scholar
  38. Jaffe PR, Wang S (2003) Potential effect of CO2-releases from deep reservoirs on the quality of fresh-water aquifers. In: Gale J, Kaya E (eds) Proceedings of 6th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp 1657–1660Google Scholar
  39. Kelly SL, Fleniken JA (1996) Development of cement evaluation quality control measures for Class I injection wells. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 165–200Google Scholar
  40. Lehr JH (1986) Underground injection: a positive advocate. Ground Water Monit Rev 6(3):4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewicki JL, Hilley GE, Oldenburg CM (2005) An improved strategy to detect CO2 leakage for verification of geologic carbon sequestration. Geophys Res Lett 32:L19403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewicki JL, Birkholzer JT, Tsang C-F (2006) Natural and industrial analogs for leakage of CO2 from storage reservoirs: identification of features, events, and processes and lessons learned. Environ Geol. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7
  43. Mathis RL, Sears SO (1984) Effect of CO2 flooding on dolomite reservoir rock, Denver Unit, Wasson (San Andres) Field, TX. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, TX, 16–19 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  44. Mercer JW, Faust CR, Brown C, Clark JE (2005) Analysis of injectate location at Dupont Beaumont Works. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller C, Fischer TA II, Clark JE, Porter WM, Hales CH, Tilton JF (1986) Flow and containment of injected wastes. Ground Water Monit Rev 6(3):37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mishra S, Pickens JF, Delay J (2006) New approaches for transient testing and long-term pressure monitoring of low-permeability caprocks. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 46, 20−22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicot J, Hovorka S, Lakshminarasimhan S (2006) Impact of carbon storage on shallow groundwater and pressure-controlled regional capacity for brine aquifers (abstract). In: Proceedings of AGU fall meeting, San Francisco, December 2006Google Scholar
  48. Oldenburg CM, Unger AJA (2003) On leakage and seepage from geologic carbon sequestration sites: unsaturated zone attenuation. Vadose Zone J 2(3):287–296 (LBNL-51928)Google Scholar
  49. Oldenburg CM, Unger AJA (2004) Coupled vadose zone and atmospheric surface-layer transport of CO2 from geologic carbon sequestration sites. Vadose Zone J 3:848–857 (LBNL-55510)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oldenburg CM, Lewicki JL (2006) On leakage and seepage of CO2 from geologic storage sites into surface water. Environ Geol 50(5):691–705, LBNL-59225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pickles WL, Cover WA (2006) Hyperspectral geobotanical remote sensing for CO2 storage monitoring. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 176, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  52. Platt SS, Rectenwald D (2005) The appropriate methodology for determining the use of a fixed-radius area of review or zone of endangering influence, when conducting an area-of-review analysis for underground injection control operations. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 45–50Google Scholar
  53. Pozdniakov SP, Bakshevskay VA, Zubkov AA, Danilov VV, Rybalchenko AI, Tsang C-F (2005) Modeling of waste injection in heterogeneous sandy clay formations. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pruess K (2006) On leakage from geologic storage reservoirs of CO2. In: Proceedings of CO2SC smposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 178, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  55. Pruess K, Garcia J (2002) Multiphase flow dynamics during CO2 disposal into saline aquifers. Environ Geol 42:282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pruess K, Xu T, Apps JA, Garcia J (2001a) Numerical modeling of aquifer disposal of CO2. In: SPE/EPA/DOE exploration and production environmental conference, San Antonio, TX, 26–28 February, SPE 66537Google Scholar
  57. Pruess K, Tsang C-F, Law DH-S, Oldenburg CM (2001b) An intercomparison study of simulation models for geologic sequestration of CO2. In: Proceedings of the first national conference on carbon sequestration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  58. Pruess K, Garcia J, Kovscek T, Oldenburg C, Rutqvist J, Steefel C, Xu T (2004) Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2. Energy 29:1431–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rao AB (2007) Technologies: separation and capture. In: Wilson EJ, Gerard D (eds) Carbon capture and sequestration. Blackwell, Ames, pp 11–34Google Scholar
  60. Rish WR (2005) A probabilistic risk assessment of Class I hazardous waste injection wells. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ross GD, Todd AC, Tweedie JA (1981) The effect of simulated CO2 flooding on the permeability of reservoir rocks, In: Fayers FY (ed) Enhanced oil recovery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 351–366Google Scholar
  62. Rutqvist J, Tsang C-F (2002) A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO2 injection into a brine aquifer. Environ Geol 42:296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruqvist J, Stephansson O (2003) The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeol J 11:7–40Google Scholar
  64. Rutqvist J, Tsang CF (2005) Coupled hydromechanical effects of CO2 injection. In: Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 649–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rutqvist J, Birkholzer J, Tsang C-F (2006a) Modeling of geomechanical processes during injection in a multilayered reservoir-caprock system and implications on site characterization. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 230, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  66. Rutqvist J, Birkholzer J, Tsang C-F (2006b) Modeling hydrological and geomechanical processes related to CO2 injection in a faulted multilayer system. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 19–22 JuneGoogle Scholar
  67. Samsonova LM, Drozhko E (1996) Migration of high-density industrial waste solutions through fresh groundwaters. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 669–680Google Scholar
  68. Strazisar BR, Kutchko BG (2006) Degradation of wellbore cement due to CO2 injection—effects of pressure and temperature. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 182, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  69. Strazisar BR, Wells AW, Diehl JR (2006) Near-surface monitoring of geologic carbon sequestration. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 185, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar
  70. Torp TA, Gale J (2004) Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The Sleipner and SACS Projects. Energy 29:1361–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tsang C-F (1996) Some hydrologic factors affecting the safety of deep injection disposal of liquid wastes. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 35–45Google Scholar
  72. Tsang CF, Apps JA (eds) (2005) Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 704 ppGoogle Scholar
  73. Tsang C-F, Moreno L, Tsang YW, Birkhölzer J (2001) Dynamic channeling of flow and transport in saturated and unsaturated heterogeneous media. In: Evans D, Nicholson T, Rasmuson TC (eds) American Geophysical Union (AGU) Geophys Monograph 42: flow and transport through unsaturated fractured rock, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  74. Tsang CF, Benson S, Kobelski B, Smith RE (2002) Scientific considerations related to regulation development for CO2 sequestration in brine formations. Environ Geol 42(2–3):275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van der Meer LGH (1995) The CO2 storage efficiency of aquifers. Energy Convers Manage 36:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vargaftik NB (1975) Tables on the thermophysical properties of liquids and gases, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Vrignaud Y, Jammes L, Van Kuijk R, Froelich B, Schilling K, Hori H, Pistre V (2006) Assessing the integrity of downhole CO2 storage using in-situ sonic, advanced ultrasonic, and electromagnetic measurements. In: Proceedings of GHGT-8 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 19–22 JuneGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang S, Jaffe PR (2004) Dissolution of a mineral phase in potable aquifers due to CO2 releases from deep formations: effect of dissolution kinetics. J Energy Convers Manage 45(18–19):2833–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Warner DL (1972) Survey of industrial waste injection wells, Final Rep US Geol Surv Contract no 14-08-0001-12280, University of Missouri, RollaGoogle Scholar
  80. Warner DL (1992) Monitoring of Class I injection wells with monitor wells and by other means, Report to Chemical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  81. Warner DL (1996) Monitoring of Class I injection wells. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 421–432Google Scholar
  82. Warner DL, Lehr JH (1977) An introduction to the technology of subsurface wastewater injection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rep 600/2-77-240Google Scholar
  83. Wesson RL, Nicholson C (1987) Earthquake hazard associated with deep well injection, Report to EPA by USGS, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  84. Whiteside RF Jr, Roth TP, Creech JR (1996) Applications of corrosion-resistant materials and cement in the design and construction of Class I injection wells. In: Apps JA, Tsang C-F (eds) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste. Academic, San Diego, pp 145–164Google Scholar
  85. Yamamoto K (2006) Site characterization of CCS: geomechanical aspects. In: Proceedings of CO2SC symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, p 26, 20–22 MarchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chin-Fu Tsang
    • 1
  • Jens Birkholzer
    • 1
  • Jonny Rutqvist
    • 1
  1. 1.Earth Sciences DivisionLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations