Environmental Geology

, Volume 53, Issue 8, pp 1723–1730 | Cite as

Hydrogeological framework and water balance studies in parts of Krishni–Yamuna interstream area, Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Original Article

Abstract

The Krishni–Yamuna interstream area is a micro-watershed in the Central Ganga Plain and a highly fertile track of Western Uttar Pradesh. The Sugarcane and wheat are the major crops of the area. Aquifers of Quaternary age form the major source of Irrigation and municipal water supplies. A detailed hydrogeological investigation was carried out in the study area with an objective to assess aquifer framework, groundwater quality and its resource potential. The hydrogeological cross section reveals occurrence of alternate layers of clay and sand. Aquifer broadly behaves as a single bodied aquifer down to the depth of 100 m bgl (metre below ground level) as the clay layers laterally pinch out. The depth to water in the area varies between 5 and 16.5 m bgl. The general groundwater flow direction is from NE to SW with few local variations. An attempt has been made to evaluate groundwater resources of the area. The water budget method focuses on the various components contributing to groundwater flow and groundwater storage changes. Changes in ground water storage can be attributed to rainfall recharge, irrigation return flow and ground water inflow to the basin minus baseflow (ground water discharge to streams or springs), evapotranspiration from ground water, pumping and ground water outflow from the basin. The recharge is obtained in the study area using Water table fluctuation and Tritium methods. The results of water balance study show that the total recharge in to the interstream region is of the order of 185.25 million m3 and discharge from the study area is of the order of 203.24 million m3, leaving a deficit balance of −17.99 million m3. Therefore, the present status of groundwater development in the present study area has acquired the declining trend. Thus, the hydrogeological analysis and water balance studies shows that the groundwater development has attained a critical state in the region.

Keywords

Hydrogeology Groundwater balance Irrigation return flows Muzaffarnagar India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial assistance received from INCOH, MoWR, Government of India, Project No. 23/36/2004-R&D is gratefully acknowledged. The authors express their gratitude to the reviewer of the manuscript, whose suggestion has improved the manuscript substantially. The authors are also thankful to Chairman, Department of Geology, A.M.U. Aligarh, for providing the basic facilities to carry out the research work.

References

  1. Ahmed I (2004) Groundwater flow modelling and water quality assessment studies in parts of Krishni–Yamuna basin, Western UP, M.Phil dissertation, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar NC, Agashe RM, Mishra AK (1982) Subsurface mapping of aquifer system, water balance study of Upper Yamuna Basin, Section-Hydrogeology, technical report No. 2, CGWB, NW region, ChandigarhGoogle Scholar
  3. Coudrain-Ribstein A, Pratx B, Talbi A, Jusserand C (1998) Is the evaporation from pheratic aquifers in arid zones independent of the soil characteristics? CR Acad Sci Paris, vol 326. Sciences de la Terra et des Planetes, pp 159–165Google Scholar
  4. Goel PS (1975) Tritium tracer studies on groundwater recharge in the alluvial deposits of Indo-Gangetic plains of Western UP, Punjab and Haryana, “approaches and methodologies for development of groundwater resources”. In: Proceedings of Indo-Germen Workshop Hyderabad, pp 319–322Google Scholar
  5. Gupta CP, Ahmed S, Gurnadha Rao VVS (1979) Conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water to arrest the water-level decline in an alluvial aquifer. J Hydrol 76(3/4):351–361Google Scholar
  6. Gupta CP, Ahmad S, Gurunadha Rao VVS (1985) Conjunctive utilization of surface water and groundwater to arrest the water level decline in an alluvial aquifer. J Hydrol 76:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karanth KR (1997) Groundwater assessment, development and management. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Khan AM (1992) Report on systematic hydrogeological surveys in parts of Muzaffar nagar district, Uttar Pradesh, CGWB (Northern region) (unpublished report)Google Scholar
  10. Logan (1964) Estimating transmissivity from routine production tests of water wells. Groundwater 2(1):35–37Google Scholar
  11. Marechal JC, Galezzi L, Dewandel B (2002) Consequences of groundwater imbalance in a hard rock watershed: a case study from Andhra Pradesh. In: Proceedings of the workshop on “The water crisis-hope and action for humanity’s future, November 2002, NGRI HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh IB (2004) Late quaternary history of the Ganga plain. J Geol Soc India 64:431–445Google Scholar
  13. Umar R (2006) Hydrogeological environment and groundwater occurrences of the alluvial aquifers in parts of the central Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, India. Hydrogeol J 14:969–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations