Environmental Geology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 101–121 | Cite as

Designing an optimal multivariate geostatistical groundwater quality monitoring network using factorial kriging and genetic algorithms

  • Ming-Sheng Yeh
  • Yu-Pin Lin
  • Liang-Cheng Chang
Original Article


The optimal selection of monitoring wells is a major task in designing an information-effective groundwater quality monitoring network which can provide sufficient and not redundant information of monitoring variables for delineating spatial distribution or variations of monitoring variables. This study develops a design approach for an optimal multivariate geostatistical groundwater quality network by proposing a network system to identify groundwater quality spatial variations by using factorial kriging with genetic algorithm. The proposed approach is applied in designing a groundwater quality monitoring network for nine variables (EC, TDS, Cl, Na, Ca, Mg, SO 4 2− , Mn and Fe) in the Pingtung Plain in Taiwan. The spatial structure results show that the variograms and cross-variograms of the nine variables can be modeled in two spatial structures: a Gaussian model with ranges 28.5 km and a spherical model with 40 km for short and long spatial scale variations, respectively. Moreover, the nine variables can be grouped into two major components for both short and long scales. The proposed optimal monitoring design model successfully obtains different optimal network systems for delineating spatial variations of the nine groundwater quality variables by using 20, 25 and 30 monitoring wells in both short scale (28.5 km) and long scale (40 km). Finally, the study confirms that the proposed model can design an optimal groundwater monitoring network that not only considers multiple groundwater quality variables but also monitors variations of monitoring variables at various spatial scales in the study area.


Groundwater quality Monitoring network design Factorial kriging Optimization Spatial Variation Pingtung plain Taiwan 


  1. Al-Zahrani MA, Moied K (2003) Optimizing water quality monitoring stations using genetic algorithms. Arab J Sci Eng 28(1B):57–75Google Scholar
  2. Batista AC, Sousa AJ, Batista MJ, Viegas L (2001) Factorial kriging with external drift: a cause study on the Penedono Region, Portugal. Appl Geochem 16(7–8):921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjemaa F, Mario MA, Loaiciga HA (1994) Multivariate geostatistical design of groundwater monitoring networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 120(4):505–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bocchi S, Castrignano A, Fornaro F, Maggiore T (2000) Application of factorial kriging for mapping soil variation at field scale. Eur J Agron 13:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brus DJ, Spatjens LEEM, de Gruijter JJ (1999) A sampling scheme for estimating the mean extractable phosphorus concentration of fields for environmental regulation. Goderma 89:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron K, Hunter P (2002) Using spatial models and kriging techniques to optimize long-term groundwater monitoring networks: a case study. Environmetrics 13(5–6):629–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castrignano A, Giugliarini L, Risaliti R, Martinelli N (2000a) Study of spatial relationships amon some soil physico-chemical properties of a field in central Italy using multivariate geostatistics. Geoderma 97:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castrignano A, Goovaerts P, Lulli L, Bragato G (2000b) A geostatistical approach to estimate probability of occurrence of Tuber melanosporum in relation to some soil properties. Geoderma 98:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang LC, Hsiao CT (2002) Dynamic optimal groundwater remediation including fixed and operation costs. Ground Water 40(5):481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christakos G, Olea R(1988) A multiple-objective optimal exploration strategy. Math Comput Model 11:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cieniawski SE, Eheart JW, Ranjithan S (1995) Using genetic algorithm to solve a multiobjective groundwater monitoring problem. Water Resour Res 31(2):399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobermann A, Goovaerts P, George T (1995) Sources of soil variation in an acid Ultisol of the Philippines. Geoderma 68:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Einax JW, Soldt U (1998) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of soil contaminations. Fresen J Anal Chem 361:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreyra RA, Apezteguia HP, Rereno R, Jones JW (2002) Reduction of soil water spatial sampling density using scaled semivariograms and simulated annealing. Geoderma 110:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithm in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  17. Goovaerts P (1992) Factorial kriging analysis: a useful tool for exploring the structure of multivariate spatial soil information. J Soil Sci 43:597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goovaerts P (1994) Study of spatial relationships between two sets of variables using multivariate geostatistics. Geoderma 62:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resource evaluation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Goovaerts P (1998) Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Bio Fertil Soils 27:315–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goovaerts P, Webster R (1994) Scale-dependent correlation between topsoil copper and cobalt concentrations in Scotland. Eur J Soil Sci 45(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, 2nd edn. Mass Inst Technol, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsiao CT, Chang LC (2002) Dynamic Optimal Groundwater Management with Inclusion of Fixed Costs. J Water Resource Plan Manag ASCE 128(1):57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudak PF, Loaiciga HA (1993) An optimization method for monitoring network design in multilayered groundwater flow systems. Water Resource Res 29(8):2835–2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiménez-Espinosa R, Chica-Olmo M (1999) Application of geostatistics to identify gold-rich areas in the Finisterre-Fervenza region, NW Spain. Appl Geochem 14(1):133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lark RM (2000) Design sampling grids from imprecise information on soil variability, and approach based on the fuzzy kriging variance. Geoderma 98:35–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lark RM (2002) Optimized spatial sampling of soil for estimation of the variogram by maximum likelihhod. Geoderma 105:49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin YP (2002) Multivariate geostatistical methods to identify and map spatial variations of soil heavy metals. Environ Geol 42:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin YP, Rouhani S (2001) Multiple-point variance analysis for optimal adjustment of a monitoring network. Environ Monit Assess 69(3):239–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin YP, Chang TK, Shih CW, Tseng CH (2002) Factorial and indicator kriging with geographic information system to delineate spatial variations and pollution sources of soil heavy metals. Environ Geol 42:900–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loaiciga HA (1989) An optimization approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design. Water Resour Res 25(8):1771–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinney DC, Lin D (1994) Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models. Water Resour Res 30(6):1897–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohan S (1997) Parameter estimation of nonlinear muskingum models using genetic algorithm. J Hydraul Eng 123(2):137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pannatier Y (1996) Variowin: software for spatial data analysis in 2D. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Pardo-Iquzquiza E, Dowd PA (2002) FACTOR2D: a computer program for factorial cokriging. Comput Geosci 28:857–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Passarella G, Vurro M, D’Agostino V, Barcelona MJ (2003) Cokriging optimization of monitoring network configuration based on fuzzy and non-fuzzy variogram evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 82:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pesti G, Kelly WE, Bogardi I (1994) Observation network design for selecting locations for water-supply wells. Environmetrics 5(2):91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prakash MR, Sihgn VS (2000) Network design for groundwater monitoring—a case study. Environ Geol 39(6):628–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reed P, Minsker B, Valocchi AJ (2000) Cost-effective long-term groundwater monitoring design using a genetic algorithm and global mass interpolation. Water Resource Res 36 (12):3731–3741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers LL, Dowla FU (1994) Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling. Water Resource Res 30(2):457–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rouhani S (1985) Variance reduction analysis. Water Resource Res 21(6):837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rouhani S, Hall TJ (1988) Geostatistical schemes for groundwater sampling. J Hydrol 103:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rouhani S, Wackernagel H, (1990) Multivariate geostatistical approach to space-time data analysis. Water Resource Res 26:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Groenigen JW, Siderius W, Stein A (1999) Constrained optimal of soil sampling for minimization of the kriging variance. Geoderma 87:239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wackernagel H (1994) Cokriging versus kriging in regionalized multivariate data analysis. Geoderma 62:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wackernagel H (1995) Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resource Res 27(9):2467–2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang XJ, Qi F (1998) The effects of sampling design on spatial structure analysis of contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 224:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wardlaw R, Sharif M(1999) Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. J Water Resource Plan Manag ASCE 125(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Bioenvironmental Systems EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations