Environmental Geology

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 1162–1170

Sorption behavior of heavy metal pollutants onto shales and correlation with shale geochemistry

Original Article

Abstract

The sorption of lead (II) and cadmium (II) on seven shales belonging to the Proterozoic Vindhyan basin, central India, and a black cotton soil, Mumbai, India, was studied and compared with sorbent geochemistry. The sorption equilibrium studies were conducted under completely mixed conditions in batch reactors (pH=5.0 and ionic strength= 0.01 M) at room temperature. The Freundlich model provided better fits to the experimental data compared to Langmuir model. High cadmium and lead sorption was observed for the calcareous shales with greater than 5% CaCO3. The Freundlich isotherm parameter relating to sorption capacity, i.e., KF, yielded a strong correlation with the calcium carbonate and calcium oxide content across the various geosorbents studied. The observed sorption pattern may be attributed to complex formation of CaCO3 with Pb2+ and Cd2+ leading to surface precipitation. Moreover, the Ca2+ present in the sorbents may also involve in ion exchange reaction with lead and cadmium.

Keywords

Adsorption Lead Cadmium Calcium carbonate Calcium oxide Heavy metals India Shale 

References

  1. Adhikari T, Singh MV (2003) Sorption characteristics of lead and cadmium in some soils of India. Geoderma 114:81–92Google Scholar
  2. Alumaa P, Steinnes E, Kirso U, Petersell V (2001) Heavy metal sorption by different Estonian soil types at low equilibrium solution concentrations. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Chem 50:104–115Google Scholar
  3. Autier V, White D (2004) Examination of cadmium sorption characteristics for a boreal soil near Fairbanks, Alaska. J Hazard Mater 106B:149–155Google Scholar
  4. Battaglia A, Calace N, Nardi E, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M (2003) Papermill sludge-soil mixture: kinetic and thermodynamic tests of cadmium and lead sorption capability. Microchem J 75:97–102Google Scholar
  5. Bektaş N, Kara S (2004) Removal of lead from aqueous solution by natural clinoptilolite: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Sep Purif Technol 39:189–200Google Scholar
  6. Bektaş N, Ağim ba, Kara S (2004) Kinetic and equilibrium studies in removing lead ions from aqueous solutions by natural sepiolite. J Hazard Mater B112:115–122Google Scholar
  7. Benaissa H, Benguella B (2004) Effect of anions and cations on cadmium sorption kinetics from aqueous solutions by chitin: experimental studies and modeling. Environ Poll 130:157–163Google Scholar
  8. Black CA (eds) (1965) Methods of soil analysis, part-2. American Society of Agronomy, Modison, p 1572Google Scholar
  9. Bose PK, Sarkar S, Chakrabarty S, Banerjee S (2001) Overview of the Meso to Neoproterozoic evolution of the Vindhyan Basin, Central India (1.4–0.55 Ga). Sed Geol 141:395–419Google Scholar
  10. Comans RNJ, Middleburg JJ (1987) Sorption of trace metals on calcite: Applicability of the surface precipitation model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:2587–2591Google Scholar
  11. Davis JA, Fuller CC, Cook AD (1987) A model for trace metal sorption processes at the calcite surface: Adsorption of Cd2+ and subsequent solid solution formation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:1477–1490Google Scholar
  12. Dong D, Nelson YM, Lion LW, Shuler ML, Ghiorse WC (2000) Adsorption of Pb and Cd onto metal oxides and organic material in natural surface coatings as determined by selective extractions: New evidence for the importance of Mn and Fe oxides. Wat Res 34:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Echeverrìa JC, Morera MT, Mazkiarán C, Gariddo JJ (1998) Competitive sorption of heavy metal by soils. Isotherms and fractional factorial experiments. Environ Poll 101:275–284Google Scholar
  14. El-Gundy MM, Hassona HH, Abdel-Sabour MF, Zalalu RAS (1994) Zinc sorption and desorption of some Egyptian shales. Egy Jr Soil Sci 34(4):389–401Google Scholar
  15. Fuller CC, Davis JA (1987) Processes and kinetics of Cd2+ sorption by a calcareous aquifer sand. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:1491–1502Google Scholar
  16. Godelitsas A, Astilleros JM, Hallam K, Harissopoulos S, Putnis A (2003) Interaction of calcium carbonates with lead in aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Technol 37:3351–3360Google Scholar
  17. Gong C, Donahoe RJ (1997) An experimental study of heavy metal attenuation and mobility in sandy loam soils. App Geochem 12:243–254Google Scholar
  18. Jackson MI (1958) Soil chemical analysis. N. J. Printice Hall, Englewood, p 489Google Scholar
  19. Jain CK, Ram D (1997) Adsorption of lead and zinc on bed sediments of the river Kali. Wat Res 31:154–162Google Scholar
  20. Koschinsky A, WinkleR A, Fritsche U (2003) Importance of different types of marine particles for the scavenging of heavy metals in deep-sea bottom water. App Geochem 18: 693–710Google Scholar
  21. Lee MY, Park JM, Yang JW (1997) Micro precipitation of lead on the surface of crab shell particles. Process Biochem 32:671–677Google Scholar
  22. Lee S, Chang L, Yang H, Chen C, Liu M (1998) Adsorption characteristics of ead onto soils. J Haza Mater A 63:37–49Google Scholar
  23. Martin-Garin A, Gaudet JP, Charlet L, Vitart X (2002) A dynamic study of the sorption and the transport processes of cadmium in calcareous sandy soils. Waste Manage 22:201–207Google Scholar
  24. Mathialagan T, Viraraghavan T (2002) Adsorption of cadmium from aqueous solutions by perlite. J Hazard Mater B94:291–303Google Scholar
  25. McBride MB (1980) Chemisorption of Cd2+ on Calcite Surfaces. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:26–28Google Scholar
  26. McGrellis S, Serafini J, Jeanjean J, Pastol J, Fedoroff M (2001) Influence of the sorption protocol on the uptake of cadmium ions in calciumhydroxyapatite. Sepa Purif Technol 24:129–138Google Scholar
  27. Morse J (1986) The surface chemistry of calcium carbonate minerals in natural waters: An overview. Mar Chem 20:91–112Google Scholar
  28. Nagy NM, Künya J (1998) Ion-exchange processes of lead and cobalt on the surface of calcium-montmorillonite in the presence of complex forming agents 1 the effect of EDTA on the sorption of lead and cobalt ions on calcium-montmorillonite. Collids Surf A 137:231–242Google Scholar
  29. Nagy NM, Künya J, Beszeda M, Beszeda I, Kàlmàn E, Keresztes Z, Papp K, Cserney I (2003) Physical and chemical formation of lead contaminants in clay and sediments. J Colliod Interf Sci 263:13–22Google Scholar
  30. Naseem R, Tahir SS (2001) Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions by using bentonite as an adsorbent. Wat Res 35:3982–3986Google Scholar
  31. Reddard Z, Gerente C, Andres Y, Cloirec PL (2002) Adsorption of several metal ions onto a low-cost biosorbent: kinetic and eqillibrium studies. Environ. Sci Technol 36:2067–2073Google Scholar
  32. Roy Moulik M, Banerjee S, Mukherji S (2004) Correlation between sorbent characteristics and metal sorption capacity of soils around Mumbai: Implications on environmental hazards management. J Geol Soc India (In press)Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro L, Brannock WW (1956) Rapid analysis of silicate rocks: A contribution to Geochemistry, US Department of interior, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith EJ (1998) Surface complaxation modeling of metal removal by recycled iron sorbent. J Environ Eng 124(10):913–919Google Scholar
  35. Suzuki Y, Takeuchi Y (1994) Uptake of a few divalent heavy-metal ion species from their aqueous solution by coral sand heated treatment at various temperatures. J Chem Eng Jap 27:165–170Google Scholar
  36. Wang W, Brusseau ML, Artiola JF (1997) The use of calcium to facilitate desorption and removal of cadmium and nickel in subsurface soils. J Cont Hydrol 25:325–336Google Scholar
  37. Zachara JM, Cowan CE, Resch CT (1991) Sorption of divalent metals on calcite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:1549–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesIIT BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Center for Environmental Science and EngineeringMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations