Environmental Geology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Association of hydrogeological factors in temporal variations of fluoride concentration in a crystalline aquifer in India

  • P. D. Sreedevi
  • S. AhmedEmail author
  • B. Made
  • E. Ledoux
  • J. M. Gandolfi
Original Article


The major part of groundwater in India is found in granitic aquifers. Fluoride in groundwater from a crystalline aquifer in a semi-arid region of granitic rocks in India, known as Maheshwaram watershed, was analyzed for spatial and temporal variability during 1999–2002 to assess the effect of hydrogeological factors on fluoride concentration. Samples were collected from 32 representative wells in the area for the pre- and post-monsoon seasons and analyzed for F content. The CHESS computer program was used to calculate ionic activities of aqueous species and the mineral saturation index (SI) for calcite and fluorite. The GARDENIA computer program was used to calculate the recharge values in the study area. The influences of dissolution kinetics of fluoride minerals and recharge from rainfall on fluoride concentration were of interest and results clearly indicate that fluoride content in groundwater depends on the interaction period of groundwater with host rock. Results could also be utilized for designing remedial measures particularly with dilution method in an optimal way.


Groundwater Fluoride Rainfall Water–rock interaction Granitic aquifer India 



The authors wish to thank the Director, NGRI, for permission to publish the paper. The research work has been carried out under projects financed by the IFCPAR, New Delhi, and CSIR, New Delhi.


  1. Ahmed S, Bertrand F, Saxena VK, Subrahmanyam K, Touchard F (2002) A geostatistical method of determining priority of measurement wells in a fluoride monitoring network in an aquifer. J Appl Geochem 4(2B):576–585Google Scholar
  2. Alveteg T, Jonsson M (1991) Amendment of high fluoride ground waters. MSc project, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1992) Standard methods of analysis of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis SN, Turk LJ (1964) Optimum depth of wells in crystalline rocks. Groundwater 2(2):6–11Google Scholar
  5. Deshmukh AN, Chakravarti PK (1995) Hydrochemical and hydrological impact of natural aquifer recharge of selected fluorosis endemic areas of Chandrapur district. Gondwana Geol Mag 9:169–184Google Scholar
  6. Dev Burman GK, Singh B, Khatri P (1995) Hydrogeochemical studies of groundwater having high fluorides contents in Chandrapur district of Vidarbha region. Maharashtra Gondwana Geol Mag 9:71–80Google Scholar
  7. Handa BK (1975) Geochemistry and genesis of fluoride containing groundwater in India. Groundwater 13(3):275–281Google Scholar
  8. Hashimi SAR, Engerrand C (1999) Groundwater status report for Maheshwaram watershed, A.P., India. Technical report no. 2013–1(IFCPAR) and GAP-182–28 (SA)Google Scholar
  9. Hem JD (1985) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. 2nd edn. US Geol. Surv. Water supply paper-2254, p 363Google Scholar
  10. Henderson P (1982) Inorganic chemistry. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Houston JFT, Lewis RT (1988) The Victoria province drought relief project, II. Borehole yield relationships. Groundwater 26(4):418–426Google Scholar
  12. Howard Ken WF, John K (1992) Constraints on the exploitation of basement aquifers in East Africa—water balance implications and the role of the regolith. J Hydrol 139:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kakar YP, Sikka VM, Janeshwar D, Bhatnagar NC (1988) Hydrochemistry and pollution of groundwater in Faridabad area, Haryana. CGWB, NW region, Chandigarh, pp 32–35Google Scholar
  14. Karanth KR (1987) Ground water assessment, development and management. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 720 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Perel’man AL (1977) Geochemistry of elements in supergene zone. Keter Publishing House, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  16. Periakali P, Subramanian S, Eswaramoorthi S, Arul B, Rajeshwara Rao N, Sridhar SGD (2001) Distribution of fluoride in the groundwater of Salem and Namakkal districts, Tamil Nadu. J Appl Geochem 3(2):120–132Google Scholar
  17. Rainwater FH, Thatcher LL (1960) Methods for collection and analysis of water samples. US Geol. Surv. Water supply paper-1456, 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Patalia R (1999) Defluoridation: Nalgonda technology vs ion exchange technology: a case study national seminar fluoride contamination, fluorosis and defluoridation techniques. In: Gyani KC et al (eds) Proceedings of the national seminar fluoride contamination, fluorosis and defluoridation techniques, pp 2–4Google Scholar
  19. Rama Rao NV (1982) Geochemical factors influencing the distribution of fluoride in rocks, soils and water sources of Nalgonda district. Doctoral Thesis, Osmania University, 320 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Rammohana Rao NV, Suryaprakasa Rao K, Schuiling RD (1993) Fluorine distribution in waters of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 21:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saxena VK, Ahmed S (2001) Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water–rock interaction study. Environ Geol 40(8):1084–1087Google Scholar
  22. Sreedevi PD (2002) A case study on changes in quality of groundwater with seasonal fluctuations of Pageru river basin, Cuddapah district, A.P. India. Environ Geol 42(4):414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Srinivasa Rao N (1997) The occurrence and behaviour of fluoride in the groundwater of the lower Vamsadhara River Basin, India. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):877–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Subba Rao (2003) Groundwater quality: focus on fluoride concentration in rural parts of Guntur districts, Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrol Sci J 48(5):835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Subba Rao N, Prakasa Rao J, John Devadas D, Srinivasa Rao KV, Krishna C, Rao N (2002) Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality in a developing urban environment of a semi-arid region, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 59:159–166Google Scholar
  26. Subrahmanyam K, Ahmed S, Dhar RL (2000) Geological and hydrogeological investigations in the Maheswaram watershed, A.P., India. Technical report no. NGRI-2000−GW-292, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumalatha S, Ambika SRA, Prasad SJ (1999) Fluoride concentration status of groundwater in Karnataka, India. Curr Sci 76:730–734Google Scholar
  28. Susheela AK (1999) Fluorosis management programme in India. Curr Sci 77:1250–1256Google Scholar
  29. Thiery D (1988) Forecast of changes in piezometric levels by a lumped hydrological model. J Hydrology 97:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van der Lee J (1998) Thermodynamic and mathematical concepts of CHESS. Technical report LHM/RD/98/39, CIG, Ecole des Mines de Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  31. WHO—World Health Organization (1984) Guidelines for drinking water quality, values. WHO, Geneva, 212 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Wodeyar BK, Sreenivasan G (1996) Occurrence of fluoride in the groundwaters and its impact in Peddavankahalla Basin, Bellary district, Karnataka, India—a preliminary study. Curr Sci 70:71–74Google Scholar
  33. Wyns R, Baltassat JM, Lachassagne P, Legchenko A, Vvairon J, Mathieu F (2004) Application of SNMR soundings for groundwater reserves mapping in weathered basement rocks (Brittany, France). Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France 175(1):1–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Sreedevi
    • 1
  • S. Ahmed
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Made
    • 2
  • E. Ledoux
    • 2
  • J. M. Gandolfi
    • 3
  1. 1.Indo-French Centre for Groundwater ResearchNational Geophysical Research InstituteHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Ecole des Mines de Paris, Centre d’Informatique GéologiqueFontainebleauFrance
  3. 3.Indo-French Centre for Groundwater ResearchBRGMOrleans Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations