Environmental Geology

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 47–61 | Cite as

Identification and evolution of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River Basins, Southern India

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The Palar and Cheyyar River Basins in Tamil Nadu state of Southern India are characterised by different geological formations, and groundwater is the major source for domestic, agricultural and other water-related activities. Hydrogeochemical studies were carried out in this area with the objective of identifying the geochemical processes and their relation to groundwater quality. Groundwater samples were collected once a month from 43 groundwater wells in this area from January 1998 to July 1999. Sampling procedures and chemical analysis were carried out as per the standard methods. Chemical data are used for mathematical calculations and graphical plots to understand the chemical process and its relation to the groundwater quality. The chemical composition of groundwater in the central part of the study area mainly depends on the recharge from lakes and the river, which is explained by a mixing mechanism. In addition, weathering of silicate minerals controls the concentration of major ions such as sodium, calcium, magnesium and potassium in the groundwater of this area. Further, the activity ratios indicate that the groundwater is in equilibrium with kaolinite, smectite and montmorrillonite. The reverse ion exchange process controls the concentration of calcium, magnesium and sodium in hard rock formations, and dissolution of carbonate minerals and accessory minerals is the source of Ca and Mg, in addition to cation exchange in the sedimentary formations. In general, the chemical composition of the groundwater in this area is influenced by rock–water interaction, dissolution and deposition of carbonate and silicate minerals, ion exchange, and surface water interactions.

Keywords

Groundwater Reverse ion exchange Dissolution and deposition Silicate weathering Mineral equilibrium Palar basin Tamil Nadu India 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the University Grants Commission, New Dehli for financial support under the Centre with potential for Excellence in Environmental Sciences and DRS-SAP schemes. The authors would like to thank the reviewers of this paper for their useful comments.

References

  1. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballukraya PN, Ravi R (1999) Characterisation of groundwater in the unconfined aquifer of Chennai city, India. J Geol Soc India 54:1–11Google Scholar
  3. Bartarya SK (1993) Hydrochemistry and rock weathering in a sub-tropical lesser himalayan river basin in Kumaun, India. J Hydrol 146:149–174Google Scholar
  4. Cerling TE, Pederson BL, Damm KLV (1989) Sodium-calcium ion exchange in the weathering of shales: Implications for global weathering budgets. Geology 17:552–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chourasia LP, Tellam JH (1992) Determination of the effect of surface water irrigation on the groundwater chemistry of a hard rock terrain in central India. Hydrolog Sci J 37(4):313–328Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch WJ (1997) Groundwater geochemistry: fundamentals and application to contamination. CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  7. Elango L (1992) Hydrogeochemistry and mass balance modelling of multilayered aquifers. PhD Thesis, Anna University, Chennai, India (unpublished)Google Scholar
  8. Elango L, Ramachandran S (1991) Salt balance model for an alluvial aquifer. In: Modeling groundwater flow and pollution. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, China, 1:479–486Google Scholar
  9. Elango L, Kannan R, Senthil Kumar M (2003) Major ion chemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical processes of groundwater in a part of Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. J Environ Geosci 10(4):157–166Google Scholar
  10. Fisher RS, Mulican III WF (1997) Hydrochemical evolution of sodium-sulphate and sodium-chloride groundwater beneath the Northern Chihuahuan desert, Trans-Pecos, Texas, USA. Hydrogeol J 5(2):4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritz B (1975) Etude thermodynamique et simulation des reactions entre mineraux et solutions, Application a la geochimie des alterations et des eaux cintinentales. Mem Sci Geol Univ Strasbourg 41:153Google Scholar
  12. Garrels RM (1967) Genesis of some groundwaters from igneous rocks. In: Abelson PH (ed) Researchers in geochemistry 2. Wiley, New York, pp 405–420Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling worlds water chemistry. Science 170:1088–1090Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton PA, Helsel DR (1995) Effects of agriculture on groundwater quality in five regions of the United States. Groundwater 33(2):217–226Google Scholar
  15. Helgeson HC (1968) Evaluation of irreversible reactions in geochemical processes involving minerals and aqueous solutions – I. Thermodynamic relations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 32:853–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helgeson HC, Garrels RM, Mackenzie FT (1969) Evaluation of irreversible reactions in geochemical processes involving minerals and aqueous solutions – II. Applications. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 33:455–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacks G (1973) Chemistry of groundwater in a district in Southern India. J Hydrol 18:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jankowski J, Acworth RI. (1997) Impact of depris-flow deposits on hydrogeochemical processes and the development of dryland salinity in the Yass River catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Hydrogeol J 5(4):71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katz BG, Coplen TB, Bullen TD, Davis JH (1998) Use of chemical and isotopic tracers to characterize the interaction between groundwater and surface water in mantled Karst. Groundwater 35(6):1014–1028Google Scholar
  20. Kraft GS, Stites W, Mechenich DJ (1999) Impacts of irrigated vegetable agriculture on a Humid North-Central US. Sand plain aquifer. Groundwater 37(4):572–580Google Scholar
  21. Kramer JR (1968) Mineral-water equilibria in silicate weathering. In: Kantor J (ed) Rep XXIII Int Geol Congr, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 6:149–160Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd JW, Heathcode JA (1985) Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to groundwater. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Matthess G (1982) The properties of groundwater. Wiley, New York, p 498Google Scholar
  24. Mayback M (1987) Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from river dissolved loads. Am J Sci 287:401–428Google Scholar
  25. Maya AL, Loucks MD (1995) Solute and isotopic geochemistry and groundwater flow in the Central Wasatch Range, Utah. J Hydrol 172:31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mohan R, Singh AK, Tripathi JK, Chowdhary GC (2000) Hydrochemistry and quality assessment of groundwater in naini industrial area, Allahabad district, Uttar Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 55:77–89Google Scholar
  27. Nativ R, Smith A (1987) Hydrogeology and geochemistry of the Ogallala aquifer southern high plains. J Hydrol 91:217–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nesbitt HW, Young GM (1984) Prediction of some weathering trends of plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 48:1523–1534Google Scholar
  29. Njitchoua R, Dever L, Fontes JC, Naah E (1997) Geochemistry, origin and recharge mechanisms of groundwaters from the Garoua sandstone aquifer, Northern Cameroon. J Hydrol 190:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paces T (1972) Chemical characteristic and equilibration in natural water-felsic rock-CO2 systems. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 36:217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. PWD (2000) Groundwater perspectives: A profile of Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu. Public Works Department, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajmohan N, Elango L (2001) Modelling the movement of chloride and nitrogen in the unsaturated zone. In: Elango L, Jayakumar R (eds) Modelling in hydrogeology (Proc United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization – International Hydrological Program (UNESCO–IHP)). Allied, New Delhi, India, pp 209–225Google Scholar
  33. Rajmohan N, Elango L, Ramachandran S, Natarajan M (2000) Major ion correlation in groundwater of Kancheepuram region, South India. Indian J Environ Prot 20(3):188–193Google Scholar
  34. Ramesam V (1982) Geochemistry of groundwater from a typical hard rock terrain. J Geol Soc India 23:201–204Google Scholar
  35. Rogers RJ (1989) Geochemical comparison of groundwater in areas of New England, New York, and Pennsylvania. Groundwater 27(5):690–712Google Scholar
  36. Sami K (1992) Recharge mechanisms and geochemical processes in a semi-arid sedimentary basin, Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Hydrol 139:27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoeller (1965) Hydrodynamique lans lekarst (ecoulemented emmagusinement). Actes Colloques Doubronik, I, AIHS et UNESCO, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  38. Schuh WM, Klinkebiel DL, Gardner JC, Meyar RF (1997) Tracer and Nitrate movements to groundwater in the Norruem Great plains. J Environ Qual 26:335–1347Google Scholar
  39. Spears DA (1986) Mineralogical control of the chemical evolution of groundwater. In: Trudgill ST (ed) Solute processes. Wiley, Chichester, UK, p 512Google Scholar
  40. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations