Environmental Geology

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 504–517

Geochemical influences on H40/1 bacteriophage inactivation in glaciofluvial sands

  • Raymond Flynn
  • Daniel Hunkeler
  • Christine Guerin
  • Christine Burn
  • Pierre Rossi
  • Michel Aragno
Original Article

Abstract

Geochemical heterogeneities may cause spatial variations in virus inactivation rates resulting from interactions with minerals leading to differences in natural disinfection capacity within an aquifer. Column studies investigating the interaction of the bacteriophage H40/1 with natural sands sampled from the Kappelen test site (Kappelen), Bern, Switzerland indicated that inactivation rates are higher for adsorbed bacteriophages than for those suspended in groundwater. Moreover, breakthrough curves obtained from field-based tracer tests at Kappelen indicated that the adsorbed H40/1 is inactivated in-situ at comparable rates. Statistical analyses of mineralogical data failed to demonstrate significant spatial variations in aquifer composition either across the site or with depth. In contrast hydrochemical analyses of groundwater samples collected at Kappelen demonstrated that iron-reducing groundwater occurs below aerobic waters. Tracer breakthrough curves indicate that H40/1 survival is not affected by variable redox conditions. Investigation results suggest that spatial geochemical variability does not significantly affect H40/1s inactivation rate at Kappelen.

Keywords

Bacteriophage Groundwater Geochemistry Inactivation Redox 

References

  1. Ackerman HW, DuBow MS (1987) Virus of procaryotes, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 242 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Adatte T, Stinnesbeck W, Keller G (1996) Lithostratigraphic and mineralogic correlations of near K-T boundary clastic sediments in northeastern Mexico: implications for origin and nature of deposition. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 307, pp 211–226Google Scholar
  3. Bales RC, Hinkle SR, Kroeger TW, Stocking K, Gerba CP (1991) Bacteriophage adsorbtion during transport through porous media: chemical preturbations and reversibility. Environ Sci Technol 25:2088–2095Google Scholar
  4. Bales RC, Shimin L, Yeh J, Lenczewski M, Gerba CP (1997) Bacteriophage and microsphere transport in saturated porous media: forced gradient experiment at Borden, Ontario. Water Resour Res 33(4):639–648Google Scholar
  5. Blanc R, Nasser A (1996) Effect of effluent quality and temperature on the persistence of viruses in soil. Water Sci Technol 33:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craun GF (1986) Statistics of waterborne disease outbreaks (1920–1980). In: Craun GF (ed) Water diseases in the United States. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 73 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Diomande AK (2000) A hydrogeological investigation of the Kappelen Aquifer in the Bernese Zeeland. Contributions from electrical tomography and the use of artificial tracers. MSc Thesis, Hydrogeology Center, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland (In French)Google Scholar
  8. Disnar JR, Guillet B, Keravis D, Massif R, Di-Giovanni C (2003) Soil organic matter (SOM) characterization by Rock-eval pyrolysis: scope and limitations. Org Geochem 34 (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Gerba CP (1984) Microbial pollutants: their survival and transport pattern to groundwater. In: Gerba CP and Bitton G (eds) Groundwater pollution microbiology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerba CP, Goyal SM, Cech I, Bogdan I (1981) Quantitative assessment of the adsorptive behaviour of viruses to soils. Environ Sci Technol 15:940–944Google Scholar
  11. Grant SB, List EJ, Linsttom ME (1993) Kinetic analysis of virus adsorption and inactivation in batch experiments. Water Resour Res 29:2067–2085Google Scholar
  12. Harvey RW and Garabedian S (1991) Use of colloid filtration theory in modeling movement of bacteria through a contaminated sandy aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 25(1):178–185Google Scholar
  13. Harvey RW (1997) Microorganisms as tracers in groundwater injection and recovery experiments: a review. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20:461–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huggenberger P, Aiger T (1999) Introduction to the special issue on aquifer sedimentology: problems, perspectives and modern approaches. Sediment Geol 129:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurst CJ, Gerba CP, Cech I (1980) Effects of environmental variables and soils characteristics on virus survival in soil. Appl Environ Microb 40:1067–1079Google Scholar
  16. Kass W (1997) Tracing technique in geohydrology. Balkema, Rotterdam, 581 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy K (2001) Bacteriophage response characterisation in highly permeable porous media aquifers (Switzerland). PhD Thesis, University of Neuchatel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy K, Muller I, Schnegg P, Rossi P, Koezel R (2001) Characterisation of the Kappelen groundwater research site (BE), Switzerland, and preliminary bacteriophage and solute tracer component responses. Beitraege Zur Hydrogeologie 52(special issue for 8th international symposium on water tracing):158–180Google Scholar
  19. Kleineidam S, Ruegner H, Grathwohl P (1999) Influence of petrographic composition/organic matter distribution of fluvial aquifer sediments on the sorption of hydrophobic contaminants. Sediment Geol 129:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loveland JP, Ryan JN, Amy GL, Harevy RW (1996) The reversibility of virus attachment to mineral surfaces. Colloids Surface A 107:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lukasic J, Cheng YF, Lu FH, Tamplin M, Farrah SR (1999) Removal of microorganisms from water by columns containing sand coated with ferric and aluminium hydroxides. Water Res 33(3):769–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macler B (1996) Developing the groundwater disinfection rule. J Am Water Works Ass 88:47–55Google Scholar
  23. Macler B, Merkle JC (2000) Current knowledge on groundwater microbial pathogens and their control. Hydrogeol J 8:29–40Google Scholar
  24. Noseda N (1999) Analytical modeling of uranine tracing tests in the unconfined aquifer at the CHYN experimental test site at Kappelen, (BE): an evaluation of sedimentological heterogeneity using multidirectional geophysical methods. MSc Thesis, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland (In French)Google Scholar
  25. Oyono E (1996) Geophysical and hydraulic study of the hydrogeology of the Kappelen experimental site, (Bern, Switzerland). MSc Thesis, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland (In French)Google Scholar
  26. Pedley S, Howard G (1997) The public health implications of microbiological contamination of groundwater. Q J Eng Geol Hydroge 30(2):179–188Google Scholar
  27. Penrod SL, Olsen TM, Grant SB (1996) Deposition kinetics of two viruses in packed beds of quartz granular media. Langmuir 12:5576–5587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ross S, Olivier JP (1964) On physical adsorption. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi P (1994) Advances in biological tracer techniques for hydrology and hydrogeology using bacteriophages. PhD Thesis, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland http://www.unine.ch/biblio/bc/theses_pdf/these_RossiP.pdf
  30. Rossi P, Kass W (1997) Phages. In: Kass W (ed) Tracing technique in geohydrology. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 244–271Google Scholar
  31. Ryan JN, Elimelech M, Ard R, Harvey RW, Johnson PR (1999) Bacteriophage PRD1 and silica colloid transport and recovery in an iron oxide coated sand aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 33:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryan JN, Harvey RW, Metge D, Elimelech M, Navigato T, Pieper AP (2002) Field and laboratory investigations of inactivation of viruses (PRD1 and MS2) attached to iron oxide-coated quartz sand. Environ Sci Technol 36:2403–2413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schijven JF, Hoogenboezem W, Hassanizadeh S (1999) Modeling removal of bacteriophages MS-2 and PRD-1 by dune recharge at Castricum, Netherlands. Water Resour Res 35(4):1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schijven JF, Hassanizadel SM (2000) Removal of viruses by soil passage: overview of modeling, processes and parameters. Crit Rev Env Sci Tech 30(1):49–127Google Scholar
  35. Schijven JF, Hassanizadeh S, Dowd SE, Pillai SD (2000) Modeling virus adsorption in batch and column experiments. Quant Microb 2:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schnegg P, Bossy F (2001) Sonde for downhole measurement of water turbidity and dye tracer concentration. In: Seiler KP, Wohnlich S (eds) New approaches characterizing groundwater flow, vol 2. Swets and Zeitlinger Lisse, Munich, pp 795–799Google Scholar
  37. Sobsey MD, Dean CH, Knuckles ME, Wagner RA (1980) Interactions and survival of enteric viruses in soil materials. Appl Environ Microb 40(1):92–101Google Scholar
  38. Sobsey MD, Shields PA, Hauchman FH, Hazard RL, Caton L (1986) Survival and transport of hepatitis A virus in soils, groundwater and wastewater. Water Sci Technol 18:97–106Google Scholar
  39. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York, 1022 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker ME (1981) Sedimentary petrology: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 252Google Scholar
  41. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1992) The proposed groundwater disinfection rule. Federal Registrar 52. 33960, available noticeGoogle Scholar
  42. Wersin P, Abrecht J, Hoehner P (2002) Large-scale redox plume in glaciofluvial deposits due to sugar-factory wastes and wastewater at Aarberg, Switzerland. Hydrogeol J 9:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westwood JCN, Satter SA (1976) The minimal infective dose. In: Berg, Bodily Lenete Melnick and Metcalf (eds) Viruses in water. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 61–69Google Scholar
  44. Yamagishi H, Ozeki H (1972) Comparative study of thermal inactivation of phages phi80 and lambda. Virology 48:316–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yates MV, Yates SR, Wagner J, Gerba CP (1987). Modeling virus survival and transport in the subsurface. J Contam Hydrol 1:329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond Flynn
    • 1
  • Daniel Hunkeler
    • 1
  • Christine Guerin
    • 1
  • Christine Burn
    • 2
  • Pierre Rossi
    • 2
  • Michel Aragno
    • 2
  1. 1.Hydrogeology CentreUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchatelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Microbiology LaboratoryUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchatelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations