Advertisement

Environmental Geology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 554–563 | Cite as

Classification of mineral water types and comparison with drinking water standards

  • Monique van der AaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In a study of 291 mineral waters from 41 different countries, 9–20% exceeded the Dutch drinking water standards for chloride, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, sulphate, and fluorine. The mineral water quality cannot be qualified as bad because the standards for these compounds (with the exception of fluorine) are not based on health issues, but matters regarding undesirable taste and possible adverse effects on the water supply system. For the mineral water data set, the amount of dissolved compounds, hardness, and chloride content appear to be the most distinctive criteria. A mineral water type classification based on these criteria will offer consumers a tool for assessing mineral water on the basis of the chemical composition data on the bottle label. In terms of the criteria mentioned, average Dutch tap water strongly resembles the Belgian and Dutch mineral waters. This similarity does not extend to the price, since Dutch tap water is about 500 times cheaper.

Keywords

Mineral water Water classification Drinking/bottled water standards 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The collection of mineral waters that is presented in this paper came about with the help of many friends and colleagues from The Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience (TNO-NITG) and the Physical Geography Department at Utrecht University. I would like to thank Geert van Wirdum for his comments on a preliminary version.

References

  1. Ball JW, Nordstrom DK (1991) WATEQ4F User's manual for WATEQ4F. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 91-183Google Scholar
  2. Begriffsbestimungen für Kurorte, Erholungsorte und Heilbrunnen (1991) Hrsg.v. Deutschen Bäderverband e.V. und vom Deutschen Fremdenverkehrsverband e.V. Bonn-Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  3. Fricke M (1993) Natural mineral water, curative-medical waters and their protection. Environ Geol 22 (1993):153–161Google Scholar
  4. Grünhut L (1911) Z Balneologie 4:433–470, cited in Quentin (1962)Google Scholar
  5. Hem JD (1970) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water, 2nd edn. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1473, United States Government Printing Office. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Stuyfzand PJ (1986) A new hydrochemical classification of water types, with Dutch examples of application. H2O (19) 1986 number 23 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  7. Stuyfzand PJ (1993) Hydrochemistry and hydrology of the coastal dune area of the western Netherlands. KIWA N.V. Research and Consultancy Division, Nieuwegein, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Wirdum G van (1991) Vegetation and hydrology of floating rich-fens. Datawyse Maastricht, 310 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization (1993) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. Zuurdeeg BW, Weiden MJJ van der (1985) Geochemical aspects of European bottled water. In: Geothermics thermal mineral waters and hydrogeology. Theophrastus Publications SA, AthensGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO-NITG
  2. 2.Technical Soil Protection CommitteeDen HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations