Advertisement

Dielectric property measurements as a method to determine the physiological state of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae stressed with furan aldehydes

  • G. Flores-Cosío
  • E. J. Herrera-López
  • M. Arellano-Plaza
  • A. Gschaedler-Mathis
  • A. Sanchez
  • L. Amaya-DelgadoEmail author
Applied microbial and cell physiology
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Cell physiology parameters are essential aspects of biological processes; however, they are difficult to determine on-line. Dielectric spectroscopy allows the on-line estimation of viable cells and can provide important information about cell physiology during culture. In this study, we investigated the dielectric property variations in Kluyveromyces marxianus SLP1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ERD yeasts stressed by 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde and 2-furaldehyde during aerobic growth. The dielectric properties of cell permittivity, specific membrane capacitance (Cm), and intracellular conductivity (σIn) were considerably affected by furan aldehydes in the same way that the cell population, viability, cell size, substrate consumption, organic acid production, and respiratory parameters were. The yeasts stressed with furan aldehydes exhibited three physiological states (φ): adaptation, replicating, and nonreplicating states. During the adaptation state, there were small and stable signs of permittivity, Cm, and σIn; additionally, no cell growth was observed. During the replicating state, cell growth was restored, and the cell viability increased; in addition, the permittivity and σIn increased rapidly and reached their maximum values, while the Cm decreased. In the nonreplicating state, the permittivity and σIn were stable, and Cm decreased to its minimum value. Our results demonstrated that knowing dielectric properties allowed us to obtain information about the physiological state of the cells under control and stressed conditions. Since the permittivity, Cm, and σIn are directly associated with the physiological state of the yeast, these results should contribute to a better understanding of the stress response of yeasts and open the possibility to on-line monitor and control the physiological state of the cell in the near future.

Keywords

Physiology state Furan aldehydes Stress response Dielectric spectroscopy Kluyveromyces marxianus Saccharomyces cerevisiae 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the “Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energética” Projects 245750 and 249564 CONACYT-SENER. Flores-Cosío Guillermo received a grant from CONACYT, México.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2019_10152_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (592 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 592 kb).

References

  1. Allen SA, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Gorsich SW (2010) Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansorge S, Esteban G, Schmid G (2007) On-line monitoring of infected Sf-9 insect cell cultures by scanning permittivity measurements and comparison with off-line biovolume measurements. Cytotechnology 55:115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-007-9093-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansorge S, Esteban G, Schmid G (2010) Multifrequency permittivity measurements enable on-line monitoring of changes in intracellular conductivity due to nutrient limitations during batch cultivations of CHO cells. Biotechnol Prog 26:272–283.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.347 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Belo I, Pinheiro R, Mota M (2005) Morphological and physiological changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by oxidative stress from hyperbaric air. J Biotechnol 115:397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvell JP, Dowd JE (2006) On-line measurements and control of viable cell density in cell culture manufacturing processes using radio-frequency impedance. Cytotechnology 50:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dopp E, Jonas L, Nebe B, Budde A, Knippel E (2000) Dielectric changes in membrane properties and cell interiors of human mesothelial cells in vitro after crocidolite asbestos exposure. Environ Health Perspect 108:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farías-Álvarez LJ, Gschaedler-Mathis A, Sánchez-Ortiz AF, Femat R, Cervantes-Martínez J, Arellano-Plaza M, Zamora-Pedraza C, Amillastre E, Ghommidh C, Herrera-López EJ (2018) Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous physiological stages determination using combined measurements from dielectric and Raman spectroscopies, a cell counter system and fluorescence flow cytometry. Biochem Eng J 136:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris LE, Davey CL, Kell DB (1990) Evidence from its temperature dependence that the β-dielectric dispersion of cell suspensions is not due solely to the charging of a static membrane capacitance. Eur Biophys J 18:267–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores-Cosío G, Arellano-Plaza M, Gschaedler-Mathis A, Amaya-Delgado L (2018) Physiological response to furan derivatives stress by Kluyveromyces marxianus SLP1 in ethanol production. Rev Mex Ing Quim 17:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JPR, Powell CD, Smart KA (2007) Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00076.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta A, Verma JP (2015) Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:550–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiehl TR, Shen D, Khattak SF, Jian Li Z, Sharfstein ST (2011) Observations of cell size dynamics under osmotic stress. Cytometryt A 79:560–569.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.21076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Labeed FH, Coley HM, Hughes MP (2006) Differences in the biophysical properties of membrane and cytoplasm of apoptotic cells revealed using dielectrophoresis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760:922–929.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.01.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu ZL (2011) Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:809–825.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Berhow MA, Kurtzman CP, Gorsich SW (2004) Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31:345–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-004-0148-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu ZL, Moon J, Andersh BJ, Slininger PJ, Weber S (2008) Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:743–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1702-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma M, Liu ZL (2010) Comparative transcriptome profiling analyses during the lag phase uncover YAP1, PDR1, PDR3, RPN4, and HSF1 as key regulatory genes in genomic adaptation to the lignocellulose derived inhibitor HMF for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11:660.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-660 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma M, Han P, Zhang R, Li H (2013) Ultrastructural changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to ethanol stress. Can J Microbiol 59:589–597.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2012-0745 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matyash V, Liebisch G, Kurzchalia TV, Shevchenko A, Schwudke D (2008) Lipid extraction by methyl-tert-butyl ether for high-throughput lipidomics. J Lipid Res 49:1137–1146.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D700041-JLR200 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Opel CF, Li J, Amanullah A (2010) Quantitative modeling of viable cell density, cell size, intracellular conductivity, and membrane capacitance in batch and fed-batch CHO processes using dielectric spectroscopy. Biotechnol Prog 26:1187–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.425 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Patel P, Markx GH (2008) Dielectric measurement of cell death. Enzyme Microb Tech 43:463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel PM, Bhat A, Markx GH (2008) A comparative study of cell death using electrical capacitance measurements and dielectrophoresis. Enzyme Microb Tech 43:523–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pethig R, Talary M (2007) Dielectrophoretic detection of membrane morphology changes in Jurkat T-cells undergoing etoposide-induced apoptosis. IET Nanobiotechnol 1:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandoval-Nuñez D, Arellano-Plaza M, Gschaedler A, Arrizon J, Amaya-Delgado L (2017) A comparative study of lignocellulosic ethanol productivities by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Clean Technol Envir Policy 20:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1470-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sehnem NT, da Silva MA, Leite FCB, de Barros PW, de Morais MA, Ayub MAZ (2013) 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural induces ADH7 and ARI1 expression in tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain P6H9 during bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 133:190–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegel DP, Epand RM (1997) The mechanism of lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal phase transitions in phosphatidylethanolamine: implications for membrane fusion mechanisms. Biophys J 73:3089–3111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78336-X CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Tibayrenc P, Preziosi-Belloy L, Roger JM, Ghommidh C (2010) Assessing yeast viability from cell size measurements? J Biotechnol 149:74–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.06.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tibayrenc P, Preziosi-Belloy L, Ghommidh C (2011) On-line monitoring of dielectrical properties of yeast cells during a stress-model alcoholic fermentation. Process Biochem 46:193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2010.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Der Rest ME, Kamminga AH, Nakano A, Anraku Y, Poolman B, Konings WN (1995) The plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: structure, function, and biogenesis. Microbiol Rev 59:304–322PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang X, Becker FF, Gascoyne PR (2012) Membrane dielectric changes indicate induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells more sensitively than surface phosphatidylserine expression or DNA fragmentation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1564:412–420.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4002.BONE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia JM, Yuan YJ (2009) Comparative lipidomics of four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different responses to furfural, phenol, and acetic acid. J Agric Food Chem 57:99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802720t CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zimmermann D, Zhou A, Kiesel M, Feldbauer K, Terpitz U, Haase W, Schneider-Hohendorf T, Bamberg E, Sukhorukov VL (2008) Effects on capacitance by overexpression of membrane proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 369:1022–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.153 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotecnología IndustrialCentro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C.ZapopanMexico
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Futuros en BioenergíaCINVESTAV-Unidad GuadalajaraZapopanMexico

Personalised recommendations