Chemical composition, antibacterial properties, and mechanism of Smilax china L. polyphenols
This work aimed at investigating the chemical composition, antibacterial properties, and effect mechanism of Smilax china L. polyphenols (SCLP). SCLP was extracted and purified, and then, its eighteen polyphenolic compounds were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis. SCLP exhibited antibacterial activity against five bacteria (Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Escherichia coli) with minimum inhibitory concentration in a range of 195.31 to 781.25 μg/mL. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus showed a higher sensitivity to SCLP. Notably, when combined with antibiotics, the SCLP–thiamphenicol and SCLP–gatifloxacin combinations showed additional properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, while SCLP–streptomycin and SCLP–penicillin combinations exhibited dramatically synergistic effects. In addition, the changes in permeability and integrity of the cell membrane and cell wall were observed by measuring UV absorption, extracellular AKP concentration, FTIR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. It is speculated that the mechanism of action of SCLP on bacteria may be described as destruction of bacterial cell wall and cell membrane. In conclusion, SCLP was a potential natural antimicrobial substance with strong antimicrobial activity, which may reduce the use of antibiotics or combat drug-resistant bacteria through synergistic combination with antibiotics.
KeywordsSmilax china L. polyphenols Antibiotics Antibacterial mechanism
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81760157).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Chen TY, Kuo SH, Chen ST, Hwang DF (2016) Differential proteomics to explore the inhibitory effects of acidic, slightly acidic electrolysed water and sodium hypochlorite solution on Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Food Chem 194:529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guendouze-Bouchefa N, Madani K, Chibane M, Boulekbache-Makhlouf L, Hauchard D, Kiendrebeogo M, Stévigny C, Okusa PN, Duez P (2015) Phenolic compounds, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of three Ericaceae from Algeria. Ind Crop Prod 70:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liang S, Dang Q, Liu C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhu W, Chang G, Sun H, Cha D, Fan B (2018) Characterization and antibacterial mechanism of poly (aminoethyl) modified chitin synthesized via a facile one-step pathway. Carbohydr Polym 195:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.109 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park SC, Kim MH, Hossain MA, Shin SY, Kim Y, Stella L, Wade JD (2008) Amphipathic α-helical peptide, HP (2–20), and its analogues derived from Helicobacter pylori: pore formation mechanism in various lipid compositions. BBA-Biomembranes. 1778(1):229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.09.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pereira V, Dias C, Vasconcelos MC, Rosa E, Saavedra MJ (2014) Antibacterial activity and synergistic effects between Eucalyptus globulus leaf residues (essential oils and extracts) and antibiotics against several isolates of respiratory tract infections (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Ind Crop Prod 52:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slinkard K, Singleton VL (1977) Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Vitic 28(1):49–55Google Scholar
- Song L, Tian L, Ma Y, Xie Y, Feng H, Qin F, Mo L, Lin S, Hou L (2017) Protection of flavonoids from Smilax china L. rhizome on phenol mucilage-induced pelvic inflammation in rats by attenuating inflammation and fibrosis. J Funct Foods 28:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Springer B, Kidan YG, Prammananan T, Ellrott K, Böttger EC, Sander P (2001) Mechanisms of streptomycin resistance: selection of mutations in the 16S rRNA gene conferring resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(10):2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.10.2877-2884.2001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tang YL, Shi YH, Zhao W, Hao G, Le GW (2008) Insertion mode of a novel anionic antimicrobial peptide MDpep5 (Val-Glu-Ser-Trp-Val) from Chinese traditional edible larvae of housefly and its effect on surface potential of bacterial membrane. J Pharm Biomed Anal 48(4):1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang N, Chen H, Xiong L, Liu X, Li X, An Q, Ye X, Wang W (2018) Phytochemical profile of ethanolic extracts of Chimonanthus salicifolius SY Hu. leaves and its antimicrobial and antibiotic-mediating activity. Ind Crop Prod 125:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang D, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Chen L, Liu Y, Cong M, Wu H, Li F, Ji C, Zhao J (2018) A defensin-like antimicrobial peptide from the manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum: investigation of the antibacterial activities and mode of action. Fish Shellfish Immunol 80:274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.06.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ziani BE, Heleno SA, Bachari K, Dias MI, Alves MJ, Barros L, Ferreira ICFR (2019) Phenolic compounds characterization by LC-DAD-ESI/MSn and bioactive properties of Thymus algeriensis Boiss. & Reut. and Ephedra alata Decne. Food Res Int 116:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar