Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 13, pp 5131–5142 | Cite as

Roles of microbes in supporting sustainable rice production using the system of rice intensification

  • Febri DoniEmail author
  • Muhamad Shakirin MispanEmail author
  • Nurul Shamsinah Mohd Suhaimi
  • Nazri Ishak
  • Norman Uphoff
Mini-Review

Abstract

The system of rice intensification (SRI) is an agroecological approach to rice cultivation that seeks to create optimal conditions for healthy plant growth by minimizing inter-plant competition, transplanting widely spaced young single seedlings, and optimizing favorable soil conditions with organic amendments, increased soil aeration by weeding, and controlled water management. These practices improve rice plant growth with yields up to three times more than with conventional cultivation methods, and increase crop resilience under biotic and abiotic stresses. This review discusses the roles of beneficial microbes in improving rice plant growth, yield, and resilience when SRI practices are used, and how these modifications in plant, soil, water, and nutrient management affect the populations and diversity of soil microorganisms. Mechanisms whereby symbiotic microbes support rice plants’ growth and performance are also discussed.

Keywords

Microbes Plant–microbe interactions Symbiosis System of rice intensification 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme FRGS/1/2015/SG03/UM/02/3, and University of Malaya under the Bantuan Kecil Penyelidikan BK004-2015 and the CEBAR fund RU006-2017.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adak A, Prasanna R, Babu S, Bidyarani N, Verma S, Pal M, Shivay YS, Nain L (2016) Micronutrient enrichment mediated by plant-microbe interactions and rice cultivation practices. J Plant Nutr 39:1216–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Shorgani NKN, Isa MHM, Yusoff WMW, Kalil MS, Hamid AA (2016) Isolation of a Clostridium acetobutylicum strain and characterization of its fermentation performance on agricultural wastes. Renew Energy 86:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Taweil HIB, Osman M, Hamid AA, Wan Mohtar WY (2009) Development of microbial inoculants and the impact of soil application on rice seedlings growth. Am J Agri Biol Sci 4:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anas I, Rupela OP, Thiyagarajan TM, Uphoff N (2011) A review of studies on SRI effects on beneficial organisms in rice soil rhizospheres. Paddy Water Environ 9:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badri DV, Weir TL, van der Lelie D, Vivanco JM (2009) Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant–microbe interactions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:642–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baez-Rogelio A, Morales-García YE, Quintero-Hernández V, Muñoz-Rojas J (2017) Next generation of microbial inoculants for agriculture and bioremediation. Microb Biotechnol 10:19–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barea JM, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C (2002) Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:343–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barison J, Uphoff N (2011) Rice yield and its relation to root growth and nutrient-use efficiency under SRI and conventional cultivation: an evaluation in Madagascar. Paddy Water Environ 9:65–78Google Scholar
  9. Benitez T, Rincon AM, Limon MC, Codon AC (2004) Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol 7:249–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13:66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Blaser MJ, Cardon ZC, Cho MK, Dangl JL, Donohue TJ, Green JL, Knight R, Maxon ME, Northen TR, Pollard KS, Brodie EL (2016) Toward a predictive understanding of Earth's microbiomes to address 21st century challenges. mBio 7:e00714–00716Google Scholar
  14. Blilou I, Ocampo JA, García-Garrido JM (2000) Induction of Ltp (lipid transfer protein) and Pal (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) gene expression in rice roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. J Exp Bot 51:1969–1977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Busby PE, Soman C, Wagner MR, Friesen ML, Kremer J, Bennett A, Morsy M, Eisen JA, Leach JE, Dangl JL (2017) Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. PLoS Biol 15:e2001793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassan F, Bottini R, Schneider G, Piccoli P (2001) Azospirillum brasilense and Azospirillum lipoferum hydrolyze conjugates of GA20 and metabolize the resultant aglycones to GA1 in seedlings of rice dwarf mutants. Plant Physiol 125:2053–2058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassman KG, Peng S, Olk DC, Ladha JK, Reichardt W, Dobermann A, Singh U (1998) Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved resource management in irrigated rice systems. Field Crops Res 56:7–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapagain T, Yamaji E (2010) The effects of irrigation method, age of seedling and spacing on crop performance productivity and water-wise rice production in Japan. Paddy Water Environ 8:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chebotar VK, Malfanova NV, Shcherbakov AV, Ahtemova GA, Borisov AY, Lugtenberg B, Tikhonovich IA (2015) Endophytic bacteria in microbial preparations that improve plant development (review). Appl Biochem Microbiol 51:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen LH, Zhang J, Shao XH, Wang SS, Miao QS, Mao XY, Zhai YM, She DL (2015) Development and evaluation of Trichoderma asperellum preparation for control of sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biocontrol Sci Technol 25:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chi F, Shen SH, Cheng HP, Jing YX, Yanni YG, Dazzo FB (2005) Ascending migration of endophytic rhizobia, from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7271–7278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Chi F, Yang P, Han F, Jing Y, Shen S (2010) Proteomic analysis of rice seedlings infected by Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. Proteomics 10:1861–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Choi J, Kim G, Park W, Shin M, Choi Y, Lee S, Kim S, Yun D (2014) Effect of SRI water management on water quality and greenhouse gas emissions in Korea. Irrig Drain 63:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Compant S, Duffy B, Jerzy N, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Doni F, Anizan I, Che Radziah CMZ, Wan Mohtar WY (2014a) Physiological and growth response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants to Trichoderma spp. inoculants. AMB Express 4:45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Doni F, Anizan I, Che Radziah CMZ, Wan Natasha WM, Abidah A, Suryadi E, Wan Mohtar WY (2014b) Enhanced rice seedling growth by Clostridium and Pseudomonas. Biotechnol 13:186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doni F, Che Radziah CMZ, Anizan I, Norela S, Fathurrahman F, Uphoff N, Wan Mohtar WY (2017) Relationships observed between Trichoderma inoculation and characteristics of rice grown under System of Rice Intensification (SRI) vs. conventional methods of cultivation. Symbiosis 72:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doni F, Zain CR, Isahak A, Fathurrahman F, Anhar A, Mohamad WN, Yusoff WM, Uphoff N (2018) A simple, efficient, and farmer-friendly Trichoderma-based biofertilizer evaluated with the SRI rice management system. Org Agric 8:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doni F, Fathurrahman F, Mispan MS, Suhaimi NSM, Yusoff WMW, Uphoff N (2019) Transcriptomic profiling of rice seedlings inoculated with the symbiotic fungus Trichoderma asperellum SL2. J Plant Growth Regul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09952-7
  30. Drogue B, Sanguin H, Chamam A, Mozar M, Llauro C, Panaud O, Prigent-Combaret C, Picault N, Wisniewski-Dyé F (2014) Plant root transcriptome profiling reveals a strain-dependent response during Azospirillum-rice cooperation. Front Plant Sci 5:607CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Duffy B, Keel C, Défago G (2004) Potential role of pathogen signaling in multitrophic plant-microbe interactions involved in disease protection. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1836–1842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, Lurie E, Podishetty NK, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Sundaresan V (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E911–E920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Elshakh AS, Anjum SI, Qiu W, Almoneafy AA, Li W, Yang Z, Xie G (2016) Controlling and defence-related mechanisms of Bacillus strains against bacterial leaf blight of rice. J Phytopathol 164:534–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fagundes CT, Amaral FA, Teixeira AL, Souza DG, Teixeira MM (2012) Adapting to environmental stresses: the role of the microbiota in controlling innate immunity and behavioral responses. Immunol Rev 245:250–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. FAO (2017) The State of Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7658e.pdf Accessed 15 June 2018
  36. Farré-Armengol G, Filella I, Llusia J, Peñuelas J (2016) Bidirectional interaction between phyllospheric microbiotas and plant volatile emissions. Trends Plant Sci 21:854–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Finkel OM, Castrillo G, Paredes SH, González IS, Dangl JL (2017) Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 38:155–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Gathorne-Hardy A, Reddy DN, Venkatanarayana M, Harriss-White B (2016) System of Rice Intensification provides environmental and economic gains but at the expense of social sustainability—a multidisciplinary analysis in India. Agr Syst 143:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gopalakrishnan S, Upadhyaya HD, Vadlamudi S, Humayun P, Vidya MS, Alekhya G, Singh A, Vijayabharathi R, Bhimineni RK, Seema M, Rathore A, Rupela O (2012) Plant growth-promoting traits of biocontrol potential bacteria isolated from rice rhizosphere. SpringerPlus 1:71Google Scholar
  40. Gopalakrishnan S, Kumar R, Humayun P, Srinivas V, Kumari B, Vijayabharathi R, Singh A, Surekha K, Padmavathi C, Somashekar N, Rao P, Latha P, Rao L, Babu V, Viraktamath B, Goud V, Loganandhan N, Gujja B, Rupela O (2014) Assessment of different methods of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation affecting growth parameters, soil chemical, biological, and microbiological properties, water saving, and grain yield in rice–rice system. Paddy Water Environ 12:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC, Tejada Moral M (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Cogent Food Agric 2:1127500Google Scholar
  42. Grayston SJ, Vaughan D, Jones D (1996) Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl Soil Ecol 5:29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guimil S, Chang HS, Zhu T, Sesma A, Osbourn A, Roux C, Ioannidis V, Oakeley EJ, Docquier M, Descombes P, Briggs SP (2005) Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8066–8070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gutjahr C, Sawers RJ, Marti G, Andrés-Hernández L, Yang SY, Casieri L, Angliker H, Oakeley EJ, Wolfender JL, Abreu-Goodger C, Paszkowski U (2015) Transcriptome diversity among rice root types during asymbiosis and interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6754–6759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hannah L, Steele M, Imbach P, Flint L, Flint A (2017) Climate change influences on pollinator, forest, and farm interactions across a climate gradient. Clim Chang 141:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harman GE (2011) Multifunctional fungal plant symbionts: new tools to enhance plant growth and productivity. New Phytol 189:647–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Harman G, Uphoff N (2019) Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica 9106395:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harman GE, Björkman T, Ondik K, Shoresh M (2008) Changing paradigms on the mode of action and uses of Trichoderma spp. for biocontrol. Outlook Pest Manag 19:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harman GE, Herrera-Estrella AH, Horwitz BA, Lorito M (2012) Special issue: Trichoderma – from basic biology to biotechnology. Microbiology 158:1–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hastuti RD, Lestari Y, Suwanto A, Saraswati R (2012) Endophytic Streptomyces spp. as biocontrol agents of rice bacterial leaf blight pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae). Hayati J Biosci 19:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hu L, Robert CA, Cadot S, Zhang X, Ye M, Li B, Manzo D, Chervet N, Steinger T, Van Der Heijden MG, Schlaeppi K (2018) Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat Commun 9:2E738Google Scholar
  52. Jagannath P, Pullabhotla H, Uphoff N (2013) Meta–analysis evaluating water use, water saving and water productivity in irrigated production of rice with SRI vs. standard management methods. Taiwan Water Conserv 61:14–49Google Scholar
  53. Jambon I, Thijs S, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J (2018) Harnessing plant-bacteria-fungi interactions to improve plant growth and degradation of organic pollutants. J Plant Interact 13:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kang S, Hao X, Du T, Tong L, Su X, Lu H, Li X, Huo Z, Li S, Ding RS (2017) Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: from research to practice. Agric Water Manag 2017:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Khadka RB, Acharya P, Uphoff N (2014) Performance of landraces and improved varieties under the System of Rice Intensification management in Bajhang district of Nepal. J Agric Environ 15:1–10Google Scholar
  56. Khadka RB, Uphoff N (2019) Effects of Trichoderma seedling treatment with System of Rice Intensification management and with conventional management of transplanted rice. Peer J 7:e5877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA (2012) Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J 6:1378–1390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lareen A, Burton F, Schäfer P (2016) Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes. Plant Mol Biol 90:575–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Lauren JG, Duxbury JM (2005) Management strategies to reduce arsenic uptake by rice. In: Behavior of arsenic in aquifers, soils and plants. Conference Proceedings. International Symposium, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  60. Li X, Bu N, Li Y, Ma L, Xin S, Zhang L (2012) Growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant responses of endophyte infected and non-infected rice under lead stress conditions. J Hazard Mater 213:55–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lin X, Zhu D, Lin X (2011) Effects of water management and organic fertilization with SRI crop practices on hybrid rice performance and rhizosphere dynamics. Paddy Water Environ 9:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Liu K, Garrett C, Fadamiro H, Kloepper JW (2016) Induction of systemic resistance in Chinese cabbage against black rot by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biol Control 99:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Loeppmann S, Blagodatskaya E, Pausch J, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Substrate quality affects kinetics and catalytic efficiency of exo-enzymes in rhizosphere and detritusphere. Soil Biol Biochem 92:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lugtenberg BJJ, Caradus JR, Johnson LJ (2016) Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:fiw194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lugtenberg B, Rozen DE, Kamilova F (2017) Wars between microbes on roots and fruits. F1000Research 6:343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Mickan BS, Abbott LK, Solaiman ZM, Mathes F, Siddique KH, Jenkins SN (2019) Soil disturbance and water stress interact to influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizosphere bacteria and potential for N and C cycling in an agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 55:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2011) Rice growth and physiological responses to SRI water management and implications for crop productivity. Paddy Water Environ 9:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pandey V, Ansari MW, Tula S, Yadav S, Sahoo RK, Shukla N, Bains G, Badal S, Chandra S, Gaur AK, Kumar A (2016) Dose-dependent response of Trichoderma harzianum in improving drought- tolerance in rice genotypes. Planta 243:1251–1264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Pangesti N, Reichelt M, van de Mortel JE, Kapsomenou E, Gershenzon J, van Loon JJA, Dicke M, Pineda A (2016) Jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathways regulate glucosinolate levels in plants during rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance against a leaf-chewing herbivore. J Chem Ecol 42:1212–1225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Pedraza RO, Bellone CH, de Bellone SC, Sorte PMFB, dos Santos Teixeira KR (2009) Azospirillum inoculation and nitrogen fertilization effect on grain yield and on the diversity of endophytic bacteria in the phyllosphere of rice rainfed crop. European J Soil Biol 45:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peng S, Huang J, Zhong X, Yang J, Wang G, Zou Y, Zhang F, Zhu Q, Buresh R, Witt C (2002) Challenge and opportunity in improving fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Agric Sci China 1:776–785Google Scholar
  72. Prasanna R, Adak A, Verma S, Bidyarani N, Babu S, Pal M, Shivay YS, Nain L (2015) Microbial inoculation in rice grown under flooded and SRI modes of cultivation elicits differential effects on plant growth and nutrient dynamics. Ecol Engineering 84:532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rahman SFSA, Singh E, Pieterse CMJ, Schenk PM (2018) Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci 267:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Randriamiharisoa R, Barison J, Uphoff N (2006) Soil biological contributions to the System of Rice Intensification. In: Uphoff N, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Laing M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press. Florida, Boca Raton, pp 409–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA (2012) Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat Commun 3:1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reddy K, Reddy C, Muralidharan K (2009) Potential of botanicals and biocontrol agents on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus infecting rice grains. Food Control 20:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Redman RS, Rodriguez RJ (2017) The symbiogenic tango: achieving climate-resilient crops via mutualistic plant-fungal relationships. In: Doty S (ed) Functional importance of the plant microbiome. Springer, Cham, pp 71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Redman RS, Dunigan DD, Rodriguez RJ (2001) Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytol 151:705–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Redman RS, Kim YO, Woodward CJ, Greer C, Espino L, Doty SL, Rodriguez RJ (2011) Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: a strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change. PLoS ONE 6:e14823CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Reeves T, Thomas G, Ramsay G (2016) Save and grow in practice: maize, rice, wheat -- a guide to sustainable cereal production. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  81. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (1997) Azoarcus spp. and their interactions with grass roots. Plant Soil 194:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rodriguez RJ, Henson J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hoy M, Wright L, Beckwith F, Kim Y, Redman RS (2008) Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J 2:404–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Römheld V, Neumann G (2006) The rhizosphere: contributions of the soil-root interface to sustainable soil systems. In: Uphoff N, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Laing M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press. Florida, Boca Raton, pp 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sakthivel N, Gnanamanickam SS (1987) Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for suppression of sheath-rot disease and for enhancement of grain yields in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2056–2059PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Sarker MA, Alam K, Gow J (2012) Exploring the relationship between climate change and rice yield in Bangladesh: an analysis of time series data. Agric Sys 112:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schlaeppi K, Bulgarelli D (2015) The plant microbiome at work. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:212–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Schulz B, Boyle C (2005) The endophytic continuum. Mycol Res 109:661–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Sessitsch A, Hardoim P, Doring J, Weilharter A, Krause A, Woyke T, Mitter B, Houberg-lotte L, Friedrich F, Rahalkar M, Hurek T, Sarkar A, Bodrossy L, van Overbeek L, Brar D, van Elsas JD, Reinhold-Hurek B (2012) Functional characteristics of an endophyte community colonizing rice roots as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:28–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Shahane AA, Shivay YS, Prasanna R, Kumar D (2019) Improving water and nutrient use efficiency in rice by changing crop establishment methods, application of microbial inoculations, and Zn fertilization. Glob Chall 1800005:1–14Google Scholar
  91. Shukla N, Awasthi RP, Rawat L, Kumar J (2012) Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 54:78–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R (2016) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, New DelhiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sooksa-Nguan T, Thies JE, Gypmantasiri P, Boonkerd N, Teaumroong N (2009) Effect of rice cultivation systems on nitrogen cycling and nitrifying bacterial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol 43:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sooksa-Nguan T, Gypmantasiri P, Boonkerd N, Thies JE, Teaumroong N (2010) Changes in bacterial community composition in the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Microbes Environ 25:224–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Stoop WA, Uphoff N, Kassam A (2002) A review of agricultural research issue raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving system for resource-poor farmers. Agric Syst 71:249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stoop WA, Sabarmatee SP, Ravindra A, Sen D, Shambu Prasad C, Thakur AK (2017) Opportunities for ecological intensification: lessons and insights from the System of Rice/Crop Intensification their implications for agricultural research and development approaches. CAB Reviews 12:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Styger E, Uphoff N (2016) The system of rice intensification (SRI): revisiting agronomy for a changing climate. Climate-Smart Agriculture Practice Brief. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  98. Suresh A, Ramesh M, Ram Reddy S (2014) Fluorescence pseudomonads contribute to the enhanced growth and yield under system of rice intensification (SRI). Indian J Agric Res 48:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thakur AK, Uphoff N, Antony E (2010) An assessment of physiological effects of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) practices compared with recommended rice cultivation practices in India. Exp Agric 46:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Thakur AK, Uphoff N, Stoop WA (2016) Scientific underpinnings of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): What is known so far? Adv Agron 135:147–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thakur AK, Mandal KG, Mohanty RK, Ambast SK (2018) Rice root growth, photosynthesis, yield and water productivity improvements through modifying cultivation practices and water management. Agric Water Manag 206:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson AC (2017) Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 8:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Turmel MS, Turner BL, Whalen JK (2011) Soil fertility and the yield response to the System of Rice Intensification. Renew Agr Food Syst 26:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Turner T, James E, Poole P (2013) The plant microbiome. Genome Biol 14:209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. UN DESA (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables Working Paper No ESA/P/WP.241Google Scholar
  106. Uphoff N (2017) SRI: an agroecological strategy to meet multiple objectives with reduced reliance on inputs. Agroecol Sust Food 41:825–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Uphoff N, Thakur AK (2019) In: Sarkar A, Sensasrma SR, VanLoon GW (eds) An agroecological strategy for adapting to climate change: the System of Rice Intensification (SRI). Sustainable Solutions for Food SecuritySpringer International Publishing, Basel, pp 229–254Google Scholar
  108. Vacher C, Hampe A, Porté AJ, Sauer U, Compant S, Morris CE (2016a) The phyllosphere: microbial jungle at the plant-climate interface. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Vacher C, Cordier T, Vallance J (2016b) Phyllosphere fungal communities differentiate more thoroughly than bacterial communities along an elevation gradient. Microb Ecol 72:1–3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Venturi V, Keel C (2016) Signaling in the rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci 21:187–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Vidhyasekaran P, Rabindran R, Muthamilan M, Nayar K, Rajappan K, Subramanian N, Vasumathi K (1997) Development of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for control of rice blast. Plant Pathol 46:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wani ZA, Ashraf N, Mohiuddin T, Riyaz-Ul-Hassan S (2015) Plant-endophyte symbiosis, an ecological perspective. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2955–2965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Watanarojanaporn N, Boonkerd N, Tittabutr P, Longtonglang A, Young JPW, Teaumroong N (2013) Effect of rice cultivation systems on indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure. Microbes Environ 28:316–324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. Wu Q, Peng X, Yang M, Zhang W, Dazzo FB, Uphoff N, Jing Y, Shen S (2018) Rhizobia promote the growth of rice shoots by targeting cell signaling, division and expansion. Plant Mol Biol 97:507–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Xuan VT (2018) Rice production, agricultural research, and the environment. In: Kerkvliet BJT, Porter DG (eds) Vietnam’s rural transformation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yanni YG, Rizk RY, Corish V, Squartini A, Ninke K, Philip-Hollingsworth S, Orgambide G, de Bruijn F, Stoltzfus J, Buckley D, Schmidt TM, Mateos PF, Ladha JK, Dazzo FB (1997) Natural endophytic association between Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii and rice roots and assessment of its potential to promote rice growth. Plant Soil 194:99–114Google Scholar
  117. Yasmin S, Hafeez FY, Mirza MS, Rasul M, Arshad HMI, Zubair M, Iqbal M (2017) Biocontrol of bacterial leaf blight of rice and profiling of secondary metabolites produced by rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa BRp3. Front Microbiol 8:1895CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. Yu YY, Jiang CH, Wang C, Chen LJ, Li HY, Xu Q, Guo JH (2017) An improved strategy for stable biocontrol agents selecting to control rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Microbiol Res 203:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Yuan S, Nie L, Wang F, Huang J, Peng S (2017) Agronomic performance of inbred and hybrid rice cultivars under simplified and reduced-input practices. Field Crops Res 210:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zachow C, Berg C, Müller H, Monk J, Berg G (2016) Endemic plants harbour specific Trichoderma communities with an exceptional potential for biocontrol of phytopathogens. J Biotechnol 235:162–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhao LM, Wu LH, Li YS, Lu XH, Zhu DF, Uphoff N (2009) Influence of the system of rice intensification on rice yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency with different N application rates. Exp Agric 45:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhao L, Wu L, Li Y, Animesh S, Zhu D, Uphoff N (2010) Comparisons of yield, water use efficiency, and soil microbial biomass as affected by the System of Rice Intensification. Commun Soil Sci Plant Analy 41:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, Wang X, Lobell DB, Huang Y, Huang M, Yao Y, Bassu S, Ciais P, Durand JL, Elliott J, Ewert F, Janssens IA, Li T, Lin E, Liu Q, Martre P, Müller C, Peng S, Peñuelas J, Ruane AC, Wallach D, Wang T, Wu D, Liu Z, Zhu Y, Zhu Z, Asseng S (2017) Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9326–9331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR)University of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.SRI International Network and Resources CenterCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations