Nutrient removal in an algal membrane photobioreactor: effects of wastewater composition and light/dark cycle
- 158 Downloads
Graesiella emersonii was cultivated in an osmotic membrane photobioreactor (OMPBR) for nutrients removal from synthetic wastewater in continuous mode. At 1.5 days of hydraulic retention time and under continuous illumination, the microalgae removed nitrogen (N) completely at influent NH4+-N concentrations of 4–16 mg/L, with removal rates of 3.03–12.1 mg/L-day. Phosphorus (P) removal in the OMPBR was through biological assimilation as well as membrane rejection, but PO43−-P assimilation by microalgae could be improved at higher NH4+-N concentrations. Microalgae biomass composition was affected by N/P ratio in wastewater, and a higher N/P ratio resulted in higher P accumulation in the biomass. The OMPBR accumulated about 0.35 g/L biomass after 12 days of operation under continuous illumination. However, OMPBR operation under 12 h light/12 h dark cycle lowered biomass productivity by 60%, which resulted in 20% decrease in NH4+-N removal and nearly threefold increase in PO43−-P accumulation in the OMPBR. Prolonged dark phase also affected carbohydrate accumulation in biomass, although its effects on lipid and protein accumulation were negligible. The microalgae also exhibited high tendency to aggregate and settle, which could be attributed to reduction in cell surface charge and enrichment of soluble algal products in the OMPBR. Due to a relatively shorter operating period, membrane biofouling and salt accumulation did not influence the permeate flux significantly. These results improve the understanding of the effects of N/P ratio and light/dark cycle on biomass accumulation and nutrients removal in the OMPBR.
KeywordsForward osmosis Membrane photobioreactor Microalgae Nutrients removal Wastewater treatment
This research was funded by the Singapore National Research Foundation under its Competitive Research Program for the project entitled, “Advanced FO Membranes and Membrane Systems for Wastewater Treatment, Water Reuse and Seawater Desalination” (Grant number: R-279-000-338-281).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Acien FG, Gomez-Serrano C, Morales-Amaral MM, Fernandez-Sevilla JM, Molina-Grima E (2016) Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(21):9013–9022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7835-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Araujo SD, Garcia VMT (2005) Growth and biochemical composition of the diatom Chaetoceros cf. wighamii brightwell under different temperature, salinity and carbon dioxide levels. I. Protein, carbohydrates and lipids. Aquaculture 246(1–4):405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delrue F, Alvarez-Diaz PD, Fon-Sing S, Fleury G, Sassi JF (2016) The environmental biorefinery: using microalgae to remediate wastewater, a win-win paradigm. Energies 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030132
- Noguchi M, Hashimoto C, Honda R, Teraoka Y, Yang S, Ninomiya K, Takahashi K (2017) Utilization of anaerobic digestion supernatant as a nutrient source in microalgal biomass production with a membrane photobioreactor. J Water Environ Technol 15(6):199–206. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.17-006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22 edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association & Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Xue WC, Tobino T, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K (2015) Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry. Water Res 69:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar