Complete nitrification: insights into the ecophysiology of comammox Nitrospira
Nitrification, the oxidation of ammonia via nitrite to nitrate, has been considered to be a stepwise process mediated by two distinct functional groups of microorganisms. The identification of complete nitrifying Nitrospira challenged not only the paradigm of labor division in nitrification, it also raises fundamental questions regarding the environmental distribution, diversity, and ecological significance of complete nitrifiers compared to canonical nitrifying microorganisms. Recent genomic and physiological surveys identified factors controlling their ecology and niche specialization, which thus potentially regulate abundances and population dynamics of the different nitrifying guilds. This review summarizes the recently obtained insights into metabolic differences of the known nitrifiers and discusses these in light of potential functional adaptation and niche differentiation between canonical and complete nitrifiers.
KeywordsNitrification Comammox Nitrospira Complete nitrification Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria Ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms
Nitrification, the sequential aerobic oxidation of ammonia to nitrate via nitrite, is a central nitrogen (N) cycling process. On the one hand, nitrification depletes the pool of accessible ammonium, the best accessible N source for biomass production. On the other hand, the products of nitrification nitrite and nitrate are widely used electron acceptors. From an anthropogenic perspective, nitrification has starkly contrasting roles. It contributes to N loss from fertilized agricultural soils by producing nitrite and nitrate, two compounds that are rapidly reduced to N-containing gases, including the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). Additionally, nitrite and nitrate can be easily washed out from the soil matrix, and thus leach into the groundwater and aquatic ecosystems. The increased N availability in these systems causes a boost of productivity with tremendous consequences, including eutrophication of rivers and lakes, algal blooms, and formation of dead zones in coastal regions. In contrast, nitrification represents the initial N cycling step in biological wastewater treatment, where well-orchestrated microbial activities result in the removal of excess N compounds.
Since the first discovery of nitrifying microorganisms by Sergei Winogradsky at the end of the nineteenth century (Winogradsky 1891), it was believed that nitrification is a two-step process performed by two distinct functional groups, the ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (AOB and NOB, respectively). However, the development of molecular techniques and novel isolation approaches tremendously improved our knowledge of the environmental key players performing this process. A milestone in nitrification research was the discovery of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). Shortly after first metagenomic indications of archaea possessing the genetic inventory for ammonia oxidation, the marine AOA Nitrosopumilus maritimus was successfully isolated (Könneke et al. 2005; Treusch et al. 2005). Since the identification of archaeal ammonia oxidizers, numerous studies have focused on their environmental distribution, physiology, and genomics to elucidate their ecological significance and potential factors for niche differentiation between AOA and their bacterial counterpart (reviewed in, e.g., Hatzenpichler 2012; Prosser and Nicol 2012).
In 2015, the surprising identification of microorganisms preforming complete nitrification on their own challenged the strict division of labor between the two nitrifying guilds, and thus caused another paradigm shift in our understanding of nitrification (Daims et al. 2015; van Kessel et al. 2015). Notably, earlier theoretical studies already discussed the existence and possible niches of comammox (COMplete AMMonium OXidation) microorganisms (Costa et al. 2006; van de Leemput et al. 2011). It was hypothesized that the truncation of nitrification might reduce the metabolic cost for a cell compared to performing the whole pathway, resulting in higher growth rates but lower yields. However, a high-growth yield as postulated for comammox organisms might be advantageous in nutrient-limited, slow growth-favoring systems with low-cell washout rates, as for instance found in biofilms. Indeed, the first comammox enrichment cultures were obtained from biofilm samples (Daims et al. 2015; van Kessel et al. 2015). Surprisingly, when analyzing the metagenomes of these enrichment cultures both research groups identified the gene set for complete nitrification in genome bins assigned to Nitrospira. Members of the genus Nitrospira have been identified as key NOB in diverse natural and man-made systems (Daebeler et al. 2014; Daims et al. 2001; Feng et al. 2016), but were assumed to comprise only autotrophic nitrite oxidizers. All known comammox Nitrospira belong to lineage II, the environmentally most widespread clade of this diverse genus, which can be phylogenetically divided into at least six lineages (Daims et al. 2016). Based on phylogenetic analyses of subunit A of the ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), the enzyme that oxidizes ammonia to hydroxylamine, comammox bacteria can be further separated into two monophyletic sister clades, designated clades A and B (Daims et al. 2015). All described comammox cultures obtained so far contain members of clade A and have been enriched from man-made systems, including a biofiltration unit of a recirculation aquaculture system (RAS; Ca. N. nitrosa and Ca. N. nitrificans; van Kessel et al. 2015) and a biofilm sustained in thermal waters from a 1200-m deep oil exploration well (N. inopinata; Daims et al. 2015). In addition, analyzing metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of clade B comammox Nitrospira gave first genomic insights into this group so far missing a cultured representative (Orellana et al. 2018; Palomo et al. 2018). Since the discovery of complete nitrifying Nitrospira, numerous studies have addressed their environmental distribution and abundance (e.g., Bartelme et al. 2017; Fowler et al. 2018; Hu and He 2017; Orellana et al. 2018; Pjevac et al. 2017) as well as their potential metabolic capabilities by (meta) genomic analyses (e.g., Camejo et al. 2017; Orellana et al. 2018; Palomo et al. 2016; Palomo et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2017). Additionally, physiological investigations of the first comammox pure culture revealed vital insights into the nitrification kinetics of complete compared to canonical nitrifiers (Kits et al. 2017). Recent review papers focused on microbial driven N cycling processes (Kuypers et al. 2018), the enzymatic aspects in nitrification (Lancaster et al. 2018), ammonia oxidation in soil (Beeckman et al. 2018), alternative roles of Nitrospira beyond nitrite oxidation (Daims et al. 2016), the biotechnological potential of the comammox process (Lawson and Lücker 2018), and summarized the published literature on comammox organisms (Hu and He 2017). In this review, we cover the main metabolic differences potentially driving niche specialization between comammox Nitrospira and canonical ammonia and nitrite oxidizers.
Environmental distribution of comammox Nitrospira compared to other nitrifying guilds
Potential niche-defining differences between strict ammonia oxidizers and complete nitrifiers
Based on relative abundance measures, comammox Nitrospira rarely is the only nitrifying guild present in a habitat. This co-occurrence of comammox and canonical ammonia oxidizers indicates a potential functional differentiation between these microbial groups (Annavajhala et al. 2018; Bartelme et al. 2017; Fowler et al. 2018; Orellana et al. 2018; Palomo et al. 2018; Pjevac et al. 2017). While for AOA and AOB the main physiological factors for niche separation were considered to be mixotrophy, ammonia affinities, and different pH optima (Prosser and Nicol 2012), little is known about potential factors driving niche specialization between comammox and canonical ammonia oxidizers.
Besides key characteristics of the ammonia-oxidizing machinery, like high ammonia affinity and low maximum ammonia oxidation rate, potential niche separating physiological characteristics include the high growth yield of N. inopinata compared to other aerobic ammonia oxidizers (Kits et al. 2017). One metabolic feature influencing the growth yield is the pathway used for carbon fixation, which differs between the nitrifying guilds. AOA fix CO2 by using a unique, highly energy efficient variant of the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate pathway, while AOB use the energy-demanding Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (Könneke et al. 2014). In contrast, Nitrospira fix CO2 via the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle (Lücker et al. 2010), which is found mainly in anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria due to the O2 sensitivity of the key enzymes 2-oxoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase and pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (Campbell et al. 2006). This O2 sensitivity might be reduced by the use of the five-subunit isoforms of these enzymes found to be conserved in Nitrospira, which have been shown to be functional under oxic conditions in Hydrogenobacter (Ikeda et al. 2006; Yamamoto et al. 2003). The presence of the ferredoxin-dependent rTCA cycle for CO2 fixation indicates a possible adaptation to microaerophilic conditions by Nitrospira, supported by the tendency of isolates to form aggregates (Nowka et al. 2015b; Ushiki et al. 2013) and the high abundance of uncultured representatives in the oxic-anoxic interface of biofilms (Schramm et al. 2000). Furthermore, the high degree of enrichment of comammox Nitrospira in a bioreactor system inoculated with activated sludge and operated under low dissolved O2 concentrations indicates a competitive advantage of comammox over canonical ammonia oxidizers under microaerophilic conditions (Camejo et al. 2017). These findings agree with the recruitment of different terminal oxidases by the nitrifying guilds. Canonical ammonia oxidizers, except for Nitrosomonas eutropha, rely on the low-affinity cytochrome aa3 oxidase to transfer electrons to O2 (Stein et al. 2007), while Nitrospira use a yet biochemically uncharacterized putative cytochrome bd-like terminal oxidase that shows some characteristics of cbb3-type oxidases and might have a stronger affinity for O2 than the aa3-type (Lücker et al. 2010).
Taken together, genomic surveys of complete nitrifiers suggest several metabolic differences between the nitrifying guilds that potentially shape microbial community composition in the environment. In addition, the observed high ammonia affinity and growth yield of the first comammox pure culture N. inopinata suggest an adaptation to slow growth in highly oligotrophic habitats (Kits et al. 2017). Identification of such niche-defining factors is of global interest considering the guild-specific differences in producing N2O, a greenhouse gas with a 300 times higher global warming potential than CO2 (IPCC 2013). Canonical AOB produce N2O during ammonia oxidation as byproduct of hydroxylamine oxidation and in hypoxic conditions as product of nitrifier denitrification (Arp and Stein 2003; Stein 2011). In contrast, AOA produce lower amounts of N2O, which is mainly generated by abiotic reactions from ammonia oxidation intermediates (Kozlowski et al. 2016b; Stieglmeier et al. 2014). In agreement with these data from pure culture studies, mesocosm experiments revealed an increased N2O yield in fertilized soil when ammonia oxidation was dominated by AOB (Hink et al. 2018). In AOB, enzymatic N2O production is catalyzed by nitric oxide reductases (NOR) that convert NO derived from nitrite reduction (Kozlowski et al. 2016a), and cytochrome P460, a periplasmic metalloenzyme shown to directly convert NH2OH to N2O under anaerobic conditions (Caranto et al. 2016). Similar to AOA, the lack of NOR homologs in complete nitrifiers indicates that Nitrospira do not produce N2O via nitrifier denitrification. In addition, although some Nitrospira lineage II encode a protein with low similarity (< 55%) to cytochrome P460 of N. europaea, a homologous gene is absent in most comammox genomes. Future physiological studies focusing on potential N2O production of complete nitrifiers are needed to determine their potential contribution to N2O emissions.
Differences in nitrogen acquisition and assimilation in Nitrospira
Besides the uptake of external ammonium, Nitrospira can intracellularly generate ammonia from cyanate and/or urea degradation. While the known canonical Nitrospira possess a cyanase for decomposing cyanate into ammonia and CO2, all known complete nitrifiers seem to have lost this enzyme. Similarly, most canonical ammonia oxidizers lack the genetic repertoire for cyanate degradation except for the freshwater AOA Nitrososphaera gargensis (Palatinszky et al. 2015). In most microorganisms, cyanate degradation is performed to either detoxify cyanate or utilize it as N source (Kamennaya et al. 2008; Luque-Almagro et al. 2008). Contrastingly, N. gargensis has been shown to proliferate on cyanate as sole energy substrate, and N. moscoviensis can provide AOB with cyanate-derived ammonia resulting in the stoichiometric conversion of cyanate to nitrate (Palatinszky et al. 2015). Cyanate is intracellularly formed during degradation of carbamoyl phosphate, an intermediate of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis and the urea cycle, and from thiocyanate, a common pollutant released by gold mining and other industrial processes (Allen and Jones 1964; Stratford et al. 1994). In addition, environmental cyanate sources include abiotic urea decomposition and photoproduction (Dirnhuber and Schutz 1948; Widner et al. 2016). Since it is technically challenging to quantify cyanate in environmental samples, studies analyzing its distribution in natural systems are rare. However, recent surveys indicate that cyanate, together with urea and amino acids, might be an important dissolved organic N compound in marine systems (Widner et al. 2013; Widner et al. 2016). In this context, metatranscriptomic analysis of an uncultured Nitrospira associated with a marine sponge revealed high expression of the cyanase encoding gene, indicating cyanate degradation by Nitrospira in this sponge-microbe symbiosis (Moitinho-Silva et al. 2017).
As mentioned above, urea can also be used by nitrifiers. It is enzymatically hydrolyzed to ammonia and CO2, and many canonical ammonia oxidizers and complete nitrifiers can use this ammonia as energy and N source (Alonso-Saez et al. 2012; Daims et al. 2015; Lu and Jia 2013; Pommerening-Röser and Koops 2005; van Kessel et al. 2015). Canonical ureolytic Nitrospira can degrade urea for N assimilation and, additionally, provide ammonia to non-ureolytic ammonia oxidizers, thus initiating full nitrification in a reciprocal feeding interaction (Koch et al. 2015). The genetic inventory for urea hydrolysis has been identified in many comammox and canonical Nitrospira (Table S1). It includes a nickel (Ni)-dependent urease (UreABC) as well as accessory proteins (UreDFG) for the maturation of the holoenzyme (Farrugia et al. 2013). Additionally, all urease-positive Nitrospira isolates except for N. moscoviensis possess a complete gene set for an ATP-dependent ABC-type urea transporter (UrtABCDE) encoded upstream of the urease structural genes (Fig. 3). This type of transporter is characterized by its high affinity for urea (Valladares et al. 2002), indicating an adaptation to low urea concentrations in the environment. In contrast to strict nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira, complete nitrifiers employ two additional urea transporters, a urea carboxylase-related transporter and an outer-membrane porin (Palomo et al. 2018). Phylogenetic analysis of the urease gamma subunit (UreA) revealed a close affiliation of most Nitrospira UreA, except for N. japonica (Ushiki et al. 2018). Aside from the distinct UreA, the urease cluster of N. japonica possesses other species-specific features, including genes encoding the metallo-chaperone UreE and an additional urea permease, which forms an urea channel for diffusion through the membrane in a pH independent manner (Sebbane et al. 2002). The Ni-chaperone UreE is supposed to insert nickel into the urease apoprotein (Farrugia et al. 2013). For other ureolytic Nitrospira, it has been hypothesized that the (NiFe)-hydrogenase maturation enzymes HypA and HypB compensate the lack of UreE (Koch et al. 2015). This distinct urease operon of N. japonica underlines the genomic flexibility of Nitrospira especially in this particular genomic region (Fig. 3). Here, comparable to the different assimilatory nitrite reductases (see above), also the urease functional modules have been exchanged in different Nitrospira species. In addition to comammox and canonical lineage II Nitrospira, ureolytic activity was also observed in Nitrospira sp. ND1, a lineage I Nitrospira isolated from activated sludge (Ushiki et al. 2018). Together with the identification of a urease operon in a sponge-associated lineage IV Nitrospira genome bin (Slaby et al. 2017), this shows a broad distribution of the urea hydrolyzing capability within the genus Nitrospira.
Metabolic versatility of Nitrospira
Members of the genus Nitrospira were considered to be of restricted metabolic capability and their presence in the environment was thus used as proxy for nitrite oxidation. However, recent studies identified a much broader metabolic flexibility, including aerobic growth on formate and hydrogen (H2) and anaerobic reduction of nitrate to nitrite in the presence of suitable electron donors (Daims et al. 2016; Ehrich et al. 1995; Koch et al. 2014; Koch et al. 2015). Comparative genomics did not reveal a prevalence of canonical or comammox Nitrospira in recruiting additional metabolic capacities, and many of the alternative metabolic features are not restricted to a certain group within Nitrospira. Two widely distributed metabolic traits for energy conservation are formate and H2 oxidation. The genetic setup for formate oxidation includes genes encoding a formate transporter and the three subunits of formate dehydrogenase. This gene cluster was identified in most canonical Nitrospira as well as in clade B comammox (Palomo et al. 2018). The capability of oxidizing formate was confirmed under oxic and anoxic conditions for N. moscoviensis (Koch et al. 2015). In addition, formate incorporation by uncultured Nitrospira was also observed in activated sludge samples in the presence and absence of nitrite under oxic conditions (Gruber-Dorninger et al. 2015).
Besides formate, H2 is a common fermentation product and the capability to exploit these substrates is especially advantageous in hypoxic or anoxic habitats. Two different types of hydrogenases have been identified in Nitrospira genomes to date. All hydrogenases identified in comammox Nitrospira belong to the [NiFe]-hydrogenase group 3b, a large enzyme family with distinct physiological roles. On the one hand, these soluble cytoplasmic, bidirectional enzymes can produce H2 by reoxidizing NAD(P)H to maintain the cellular redox balance during fermentation (Berney et al. 2014b). On the other hand, they can provide electrons for CO2 fixation by oxidizing H2 in Hydrogenobacter (Yoon et al. 1996), as was recently also hypothesized for mixotrophic verrucomicrobial methanotrophs (Carere et al. 2017). Furthermore, these hydrogenases might also be involved in sulfur cycling by reducing elemental sulfur or polysulfide to H2S as shown for hyperthermophilic archaea (Ma et al. 2000). However, the detection of H2S production by Mycobacterium smegmatis under O2 limitation in a mutant lacking all hydrogenases challenges the contribution of group 3b hydrogenase to this process, at least in this bacterium (Berney et al. 2014a). The metabolic function of this type of hydrogenase in complete nitrifiers remains to be determined and might include (i) H2 oxidation as alternative or additional electron source for energy conservation and/or CO2 fixation, (ii) H2 evolution for maintaining the redox balance during anaerobic degradation of simple organic matter (as suggested by Kits et al. 2017), and (iii) H2S production for sulfur assimilation. Moreover, the identification of group 3b hydrogenases in canonical ammonia and nitrite oxidizer genomes, like the marine NOB Nitrococcus mobilis (Füssel et al. 2017), Nitrospina marina (Lücker et al. 2013), and several AOB including Nitrosococcus halophilus Nc4 (GenBank accession number ADE14678.1) and Nitrosomonas mobilis (Thandar et al. 2016) emphasizes the need to characterize the physiological function(s) of this enzyme in nitrifying bacteria. N. moscoviensis is the only Nitrospira species known to have recruited a different type of hydrogenase. In this organism, a cytoplasmic group 2a [NiFe]-hydrogenase enables aerobic growth with H2 as sole substrate (Koch et al. 2014). Notably, nitrite and H2 can be oxidized simultaneously, indicating metabolic compatibility of these substrates and a lack of substrate preference. Furthermore, N. moscoviensis can couple H2 oxidation to anaerobic nitrate reduction (Ehrich et al. 1995).
The lack of known dissimilatory nitrate reductases in the genome of N. moscoviensis points to a reversibility of NXR. Contrastingly, in N. inopinata a putative periplasmic nitrate reductase (NAP) might additionally catalyze nitrate reduction in the presence of suitable electron donors (Kits et al. 2017). Intriguingly, some Nitrospira genomes furthermore contain a pentaheme nitrite reductase (NrfAH), including N. inopinata and Nitrospira sp. ND1 (Table S1). NrfAH catalyzes dissimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium (DNRA) during anaerobic growth on low-potential electron donors. This metabolic capability suggests an additional ecological function of Nitrospira in the biogeochemical N cycle. While complete nitrifiers represent an ammonia sink, Nitrospira performing DNRA would produce ammonia and act as source of this N compound. The observed metabolic versatility of Nitrospira may be essential for successful adaptation to fluctuating environmental conditions. However, this flexibility poses a challenge when inferring the function of Nitrospira in the environment, since their occurrence and abundance might not correlate with nitrification activity.
Isolation of comammox Nitrospira
Genomic approaches can yield a great amount of novel insights into the metabolic potential of an organism or a complex microbial community. However, novel physiologies cannot be determined based on genome-inferred information alone. In order to facilitate the study of fastidious microorganisms like nitrifiers, state-of-the-art cultivation-independent methods have successfully been employed to study comammox and canonical Nitrospira in enrichment cultures or directly in their environment (Daims et al. 2015; Gruber-Dorninger et al. 2015; van Kessel et al. 2015). While these approaches allow the direct confirmation of proposed physiologies on single-cell level, they cannot completely replace classical cultivation-dependent physiological characterizations, mainly due to their dependency on specialized equipment and laboratory setups (reviewed by Singer et al. 2017) and potential metabolic interactions with co-occurring microbes. However, the isolation of novel complete nitrifiers is challenging due to their low growth rates and the difficulty to separate them from other nitrifying and heterotrophic microbes. Until now, N. inopinata is the only available comammox pure culture (Kits et al. 2017). This complete nitrifier was first highly enriched in batch cultures that were regularly transferred (Daims et al. 2015). Subsequently, a pure culture was obtained by dilution to extinction (Kits et al. 2017). In contrast to this classical cultivation approach, a co-enrichment of Ca. N. nitrosa and Ca. N. nitrificans was obtained in a hypoxic bioreactor system operated in sequencing-batch mode and supplied with low concentrations of ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate (van Kessel et al. 2015). Like most nitrifying microorganisms, the vast majority of known Nitrospira species prefers to grow in dense microcolonies in biofilm-like structures (Nowka et al. 2015b; Ushiki et al. 2013). This makes it virtually impossible to separate them from accompanying heterotrophic contaminants by classical cultivation methods alone. To circumvent this challenge, physical isolation methods can be employed to segregate Nitrospira cells or clonal microcolonies from their heterotrophic companions in pre-enriched cultures. These include the use of label-free cell sorting (Fujitani et al. 2014), optical tweezers (Nowka et al. 2015b), and a combination of Raman microspectroscopy and microfluidic cell sorting (reviewed in Huys and Raes 2018). These techniques also hold the biggest promise to obtain pure cultures of comammox Nitrospira derived from engineered environments like drinking and wastewater treatment systems, which will be invaluable to study their role and competitive niche, and to elucidate their biotechnological potential in order to optimize sustainable water treatment in the future.
Over the last years, our understanding of nitrification and nitrifying microorganisms dramatically improved due to the identification of novel key players, like AOA and complete nitrifiers. Furthermore, the identification of novel metabolic pathways and interactions, like the potential reciprocal feeding interactions of aerobic nitrifiers based on urea and cyanate hydrolysis, revolutionized our view of the N cycle. These milestones in nitrification research show that aerobic ammonia oxidation to nitrate is much more complex than simple cross-feeding between two functional groups. The recent identification of the long-sought complete nitrifiers within the genus Nitrospira not only overturned a century-old dogma of nitrification research; it also demonstrated the questionability of simplified correlations of metabolic functions to taxonomy-defined groups. Without in situ activity determination and/or a combination of genomic and transcriptomic data, it is difficult to assign a metabolic function to Nitrospira in the environment, since members of this genus could perform full nitrification, nitrite oxidation, or other alternative lifestyles beyond the N cycle-like formate or hydrogen oxidation. Thus, more targeted approaches to identify and isolate comammox Nitrospira are needed to reveal and confirm niche-separating physiological features and to further assess the ecological significance of complete nitrification in natural and engineered ecosystems.
This study was funded by the Radboud Excellence Initiative and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, SIAM Gravitation Grant 024.002.002 and VENI grant 863.14.019).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Alonso-Saez L, Waller AS, Mende DR, Bakker K, Farnelid H, Yager PL, Lovejoy C, Tremblay JE, Potvin M, Heinrich F, Estrada M, Riemann L, Bork P, Pedros-Alio C, Bertilsson S (2012) Role for urea in nitrification by polar marine Archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(44):17989–17994. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201914109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bartelme RP, McLellan SL, Newton RJ (2017) Freshwater recirculating aquaculture system operations drive biofilter bacterial community shifts around a stable nitrifying consortium of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and comammox Nitrospira. Front Microbiol 8:18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berney M, Greening C, Conrad R, Jacobs WR, Cook GM (2014a) An obligately aerobic soil bacterium activates fermentative hydrogen production to survive reductive stress during hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(31):11479–11484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407034111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Carere CR, Hards K, Houghton KM, Power JF, McDonald B, Collet C, Gapes DJ, Sparling R, Boyd ES, Cook GM, Greening C, Stott MB (2017) Mixotrophy drives niche expansion of verrucomicrobial methanotrophs. Isme J 11(11):2599–2610. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Daebeler A, Bodelier PLE, Yan Z, Hefting MM, Jia Z, Laanbroek HJ (2014) Interactions between Thaumarchaea, Nitrospira and methanotrophs modulate autotrophic nitrification in volcanic grassland soil. Isme J 8(12):2397–2410. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.81 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Daims H, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH, Schleifer KH, Wagner M (2001) In situ characterization of Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria active in wastewater treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(11):5273–5284. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.11.5273-5284.2001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Daims H, Lebedeva EV, Pjevac P, Han P, Herbold C, Albertsen M, Jehmlich N, Palatinszky M, Vierheilig J, Bulaev A, Kirkegaard RH, von Bergen M, Rattei T, Bendinger B, Nielsen PH, Wagner M (2015) Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528(7583):504–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16461 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Füssel J, Lücker S, Yilmaz P, Nowka B, van Kessel M, Bourceau P, Hach PF, Littmann S, Berg J, Spieck E, Daims H, Kuypers MMM, Lam P (2017) Adaptability as the key to success for the ubiquitous marine nitrite oxidizer Nitrococcus. Sci Adv 3(11):9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda T, Ochiai T, Morita S, Nishiyama A, Yamada E, Arai H, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2006) Anabolic five subunit-type pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus TK-6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.155 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Kits KD, Sedlacek CJ, Lebedeva EV, Han P, Bulaev A, Pjevac P, Daebeler A, Romano S, Albertsen M, Stein LY, Daims H, Wagner M (2017) Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle. Nature 549(7671):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23679 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Klotz MG, Schmid MC, Strous M, den Camp H, Jetten MSM, Hooper AB (2008) Evolution of an octahaem cytochrome c protein family that is key to aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidation by bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10(11):3150–3163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01733.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch H, Galushko A, Albertsen M, Schintlmeister A, Gruber-Dorninger C, Lücker S, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Spieck E, Richter A, Nielsen PH, Wagner M, Daims H (2014) Growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by aerobic hydrogen oxidation. Science 345(6200):1052–1054. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256985 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch H, Lücker S, Albertsen M, Kitzinger K, Herbold C, Spieck E, Nielsen PH, Wagner M, Daims H (2015) Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus Nitrospira. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(36):11371–11376. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506533112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Könneke M, Schubert DM, Brown PC, Hugler M, Standfest S, Schwander T, von Borzyskowski LS, Erb TJ, Stahl DA, Berg IA (2014) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea use the most energy-efficient aerobic pathway for CO2 fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(22):8239–8244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402028111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lücker S, Wagner M, Maixner F, Pelletier E, Koch H, Vacherie B, Rattei T, Damste JSS, Spieck E, Le Paslier D, Daims H (2010) A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(30):13479–13484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003860107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lupo D, Li XD, Durand A, Tomizaki T, Cherif-Zahar B, Matassi G, Merrick M, Winkler FK (2007) The 1.3-angstrom resolution structure of Nitrosomonas europaea Rh50 and mechanistic implications for NH3 transport by Rhesus family proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(49):19303–19308. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706563104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Luque-Almagro VM, Huertas MJ, Saez LP, Luque-Romero MM, Moreno-Vivian C, Castillo F, Roldan MD, Blasco R (2008) Characterization of the Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes CECT5344 cyanase, an enzyme that is not essential for cyanide assimilation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(20):6280–6288. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00916-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14-14 Nov. 2010. p 1–8Google Scholar
- Orellana LH, Chee-Sanford JC, Sanford RA, Loffler FE, Konstantinidis KT (2018) Year-round shotgun metagenomes reveal stable microbial communities in agricultural soils and novel ammonia oxidizers responding to fertilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 84(2):14. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01646-17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palomo A, Fowler SJ, Gulay A, Rasmussen S, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Smets BF (2016) Metagenomic analysis of rapid gravity sand filter microbial communities suggests novel physiology of Nitrospira spp. Isme J 10(11):2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.63 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pjevac P, Schauberger C, Poghosyan L, Herbold CW, van Kessel M, Daebeler A, Steinberger M, Jetten MSM, Lücker S, Wagner M, Daims H (2017) AmoA-targeted polymerase chain reaction primers for the specific detection and quantification of comammox Nitrospira in the environment. Front Microbiol 8:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qin W, Amin SA, Lundeen RA, Heal KR, Martens-Habbena W, Turkarslan S, Urakawa H, Costa KC, Hendrickson EL, Wang T, Beck DAC, Tiquia-Arashiro SM, Taub F, Holmes AD, Vajrala N, Berube PM, Lowe TM, Moffett JW, Devol AH, Baliga NS, Arp DJ, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Hackett M, Armbrust EV, Ingalls AE, Stahl DA (2018) Stress response of a marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeon informs physiological status of environmental populations. Isme J 12(2):508–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.186 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sebbane F, Bury-Mone S, Cailliau K, Browaeys-Poly E, De Reuse H, Simonet M (2002) The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Yut protein, a new type of urea transporter homologous to eukaryotic channels and functionally interchangeable in vitro with the Helicobacter pylori UreI protein. Mol Microbiol 45(4):1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03096.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein LY, Arp DJ, Berube PM, Chain PSG, Hauser L, Jetten MSM, Klotz MG, Larimer FW, Norton JM, den Camp H, Shin M, Wei XM (2007) Whole-genome analysis of the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, Nitrosomonas eutropha C91: implications for niche adaptation. Environ Microbiol 9(12):2993–3007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01409.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stieglmeier M, Mooshammer M, Kitzler B, Wanek W, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Richter A, Schleper C (2014) Aerobic nitrous oxide production through N-nitrosating hybrid formation in ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Isme J 8(5):1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.220 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Treusch AH, Leininger S, Kletzin A, Schuster SC, Klenk HP, Schleper C (2005) Novel genes for nitrite reductase and Amo-related proteins indicate a role of uncultivated mesophilic crenarchaeota in nitrogen cycling. Environ Microbiol 7(12):1985–1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00906.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ushiki N, Fujitani H, Shimada Y, Morohoshi T, Sekiguchi Y, Tsuneda S (2018) Genomic analysis of two phylogenetically distinct Nitrospira species reveals their genomic plasticity and functional diversity. Front Microbiol 8(2637). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02637
- Winogradsky S (1891) Recherches sur les organisms de la nitrification. Ann Inst Pasteur 5:577–616Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.