Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 102, Issue 24, pp 10551–10560 | Cite as

Proteomic characterization and antifungal activity of potato tuber proteins isolated from starch production waste under different temperature regimes

  • Veronika BártováEmail author
  • Jan Bárta
  • Andrea Vlačihová
  • Ondřej Šedo
  • Zbyněk Zdráhal
  • Hana Konečná
  • Adéla Stupková
  • Josef Švajner
Biotechnologically relevant enzymes and proteins
  • 197 Downloads

Abstract

Proteins were obtained from effluent of a starch manufacture by using different isolation temperatures (40, 60, 80, and 100 °C). The proteins, remaining in effluent after treatment of potato juice at 80 and 100 °C differed significantly in composition and in structural stability as well as in trypsin inhibitory and antifungal activities in comparison with the variants of 40 and 60 °C. The protein samples of 80 °C exhibited the highest antifungal activity and its average value of IC50 against five strains of two Fusarium species was determined in average at 0.18 mg ml−1. The 80 °C protein samples consisted predominantly of low-molecular proteins (7–17 kDa) identified as potato tuber protease inhibitors I and II. Predominantly, protease inhibitors II were identified for the protein samples obtained by 100 °C and here we identified 7 spots in comparison with 12 identified for the 80 °C samples. Samples of 40 and 60 °C with low antifungal activities represent high variability of detected and identified proteins. We identified various representatives of aspartic, cysteine, and serine protease inhibitors in both types of samples. These samples also contained Kunitz-type protease inhibitors that were not found in the 80 and 100 °C samples which documented thermal unstableness of Kunitz-type protease inhibitors. Functional stability at high temperatures and antifungal activity of isolated potato protease inhibitors I and II support the potential of this fraction usage in food, feed, pharmaceutical, or agricultural industry and offer new products for starch manufactures. At the same time, utilization of the stable protein fraction of waste deproteinized potato water promotes exploitation of potato starch production resources.

Keywords

Potato Solanum tuberosum L. Thermally stable proteins Protease inhibitors Antifungal activity 

Notes

Funding information

The work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, project nos. 522/09/1693, and by the Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, project GAJU 112/2016/Z. The financial support of the MS measurements at the Proteomics Core Facility was received from the CIISB research infrastructure project LM2015043 that was funded by MEYS CR.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no competing interests.

References

  1. Alt V, Steinhof R, Lotz M, Uber R, Kasper C, Scheper T (2005) Optimization of glycoalkaloid analysis for use in industrial potato fruit juice downstreaming. Eng Life Sci 5:562–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (2016) Official methods of analysis of the association of AOAC International, 20th edn. AOAC International, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bártová V, Bárta J (2009) Chemical composition and nutritional value of protein concentrates isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) fruit juice by precipitation with ethanol or ferric chloride. J Agric Food Chem 57:9028–9034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feldman ML, Andreu AB, Korgan S, Lobato MC, Huarte M, Walling LL, Daleo GR (2014) PLPKI: a novel serine protease inhibitor as a potential biochemical marker involved in horizontal resistence to Phytophtora infestans. Plant Breed 133:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harris PWR, Yang S-H, Molina A, López G, Middleditch M, Brimble MA (2014) Plant antimicrobial peptides Snakin-1 and Snakin-2: chemical synthesis and insights into the disulfide connectivity. Chem Eur J 20:5102–5110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heibges A, Glaczinski H, Ballvora A, Salamini F (2003) Structural diversity and organization of three gene families for Kunitz-type enzyme inhibitors from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Mol Gen Genomics 269:526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hermosa MR, Turrà D, Fogliano V, Monte E, Lorito M (2006) Identification and characterization of potato protease inhibitors able to inhibit pathogenicity and growth of Botrytis cinerea. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 68:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ICUMSA (2012) Subject S7. ICUMSA proceedings, 28th session Cambridge, Verlag Dr. A. Bartens, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Judd RC (2002) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of peptides. In: Walker JM (ed) The protein protocols handbook. University of Hertfordshire, HatfieldGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim J-Y, Park S-C, Kim M-H, Lim H-T, Park Y, Hahm K-S (2005) Antimicrobial activity studies on a trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor obtained from potato. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 330:921–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim J-Y, Gopal R, Kim SY, Seo CH, Lee HB, Cheong H, Park Y (2013) PG-2, a potent AMP against pathogenic microbial strains, from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Gogu Valley) tubers not cytotoxic against human cells. Int J Mol Sci 14:4349–4360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konečná H, Fridrichová D, Lochmanová G, Bárta J, Zdráhal Z (2013) Preventing the mixed detergent micelle effect in two-dimensional electrophoresis on Tris-tricine gels. Electrophoresis 34:1969–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koppelman SJ, van Koningsveld GA, Knulst AC, Gruppen H, Pigmans IG, de Jongh HH (2002) Effect of heat-induced aggregation on the IgE binding of patatin (Sol t 1) is dominated by other potato proteins. J Agric Food Chem 50:1562–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovalskaya N, Hammond RW (2009) Expression and functional characterization of the plant antimicrobial snakin-1 and defensin recombinant proteins. Protein Expr Purif 63:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petersson EV, Arif U, Schulzová V, Krtková V, Hajšlová J, Mejer J, Andersson HC, Jonsson L, Sitbon F (2013) Glycoalkaloid and calystegine levels in table potato cultivars subjected to wounding, light, and heat treatments. J Agric Food Chem 61:5893–5903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pots M (1999) Physico-chemical properties and thermal aggregation of patatin, the major potato tuber protein. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. Pouvreau L (2004) Occurrence and physico-chemical properties of protease inhibitors from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum). Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. Pouvreau L, Gruppen H, Piersma SR, van den Broek LAM, van Koningsveld GA, Voragen AGJ (2001) Relative abundance and inhibitory distribution of protease inhibitors in potato juice from cv. Elkana. J Agric Food Chem 49:2864–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pouvreau L, Gruppen H, van Koningsveld GA, van den Broek LAM, Voragen AGJ (2003) The most abundant protease inhibitors in potato tubers (cv. Elkana) is a serine protease inhibitor from the Kunitz family. J Agric Food Chem 51:5001–5005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pouvreau L, Gruppen H, van Koningsveld G, van den Broek LAM, Voragen AGJ (2005a) Conformational stability of the potato serine protease inhibitor group. J Agric Food Chem 53:3191–3196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pouvreau L, Krpec T, Gruppen H, van Koningsveld G, van den Broek LAM, Voragen AGJ (2005b) Structure and stability of the potato cysteine protease inhibitor group (cv. Elkana). J Agric Food Chem 53:5739–5746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quilis J, Meynard D, Vila L, Avilés FX, Guiderdoni E, San Sekundo B (2007) Potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor gene provides pathogen resistance in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol J 5:537–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Revina TA, Gerasimova NG, Kladnitskaya GV, Chalenko GI, Valueva TA (2008) Effect of proteinaceous proteinase inhibitors from potato tubers on the growth and development of phytopathogenic microorganisms. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol 44:101–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Revina TA, Kladnitskaya GV, Gerasimova NG, Gvozdeva NG, Valueva TA (2010) Protein trypsin inhibitor from potato tubers. Biochem Mosc 75:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryan CA (1990) Protease inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defences against insects and pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:425–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schägger H (2006) Tricine–SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc 1:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith C, van Megen W, Twaalhofen L, Hitchcock C (1980) The determination of trypsin inhibitor levels in foodstuffs. J Sci Food Agric 31:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Speranskaya AS, Krinitsina AA, Revina TA, Gerasimova NG, Keruchenko YS, Shevelev AB, Valueva TA (2006) Heterologous expression, purification and properties of a potato protein inhibitor of serine proteinases. Biochem Mosc 71:1176–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valueva TA, Revina TA, Kladnitskaya GV, Mosolov VV (1998) Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitors from intact and Phytophthora-infected potato tubers. FEBS Lett 426:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Koningsveld GA, Gruppen H, de Jongh HH, Wijngaards G, van Boekel MA, Walstra P, Voragen AG (2001) Effects of pH and heat treatments on the structure and solubility of potato proteins in different preparations. J Agric Food Chem 49:4889–4897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woloshuk CP, Meulenhoff JS, Sela-Buurlage M, van den Elzen PJ, Cornelissen BJ (1991) Pathogen-induced proteins with inhibitory activity toward Phytophtora infestans. Plant Cell 3:619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Production, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Mendel Centre of Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of TechnologyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations