Improving the acetic acid tolerance and fermentation of Acetobacter pasteurianus by nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA
Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are widely used in acetic acid fermentation due to their remarkable ability to oxidize ethanol and high tolerance against acetic acid. In Acetobacter pasteurianus, nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA was up-regulated 2.1 times by acetic acid when compared with that without acetic acid. To study the effects of UvrA on A. pasteurianus acetic acid tolerance, uvrA knockout strain AC2005-ΔuvrA, uvrA overexpression strain AC2005 (pMV24-uvrA), and the control strain AC2005 (pMV24), were constructed. One percent initial acetic acid was almost lethal to AC2005-ΔuvrA. However, the biomass of the UvrA overexpression strain was higher than that of the control under acetic acid concentrations. After 6% acetic acid shock for 20 and 40 min, the survival ratios of AC2005 (pMV24-uvrA) were 2 and 0.12%, respectively; however, they were 1.5 and 0.06% for the control strain AC2005 (pMV24). UvrA overexpression enhanced the acetification rate by 21.7% when compared with the control. The enzymes involved in ethanol oxidation and acetic acid tolerance were up-regulated during acetic acid fermentation due to the overexpression of UvrA. Therefore, in A. pasteurianus, UvrA could be induced by acetic acid and is related with the acetic acid tolerance by protecting the genome against acetic acid to ensure the protein expression and metabolism.
KeywordsAcetic acid tolerance Acetobacter pasteurianus Nucleotide excision repair protein Acetic acid fermentation Genome damage
The authors would like to acknowledge the Mizkan Group Corporation, Japan, for their plasmid pMV24 and Dr. Wei Liujing (East China University of Science and Technology, China) for gifting the plasmids pSUP202 and pRK2013.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201406, 31671851), Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (16YFZCNC00650, 17PTGCCX00190), Rural Affairs Committee of Tianjin (201701180), Program for Changjiang Scholars and the Innovative University Research Team (IRT15R49), and the Innovative Research Team of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission (TD13-5013).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Drouin R, Gao S, Holmquist G (1996) Agarose gel electrophoresis for DNA damage analysis. Technologies for Detection of DNA Damage & Mutations. Springer, Boston, pp 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0301-3_337-43
- Fukaya M, Tayama K, Tamaki T, Tagami H, Okumura H, Kawamura Y (1989) Cloning of the membrane-bound aldehyde dehydrogenase gene of Acetobacter polyoxogenes and improvement of acetic acid production by use of the cloned gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:171–176 http://aem.asm.org/content/55/1/171 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Grinholc M, Rodziewicz A, Forys K, Rapackazdonczyk A, Kawiak A, Domachowska A, Golunski G, Wolz C, Mesak L, Becker K (2015) Fine-tuning recA expression in Staphylococcus aureus for antimicrobial photoinactivation: importance of photo-induced DNA damage in the photoinactivation mechanism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(21):9161–9176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6863-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hahn K, Faustoferri R, Quivey J (1999) Induction of an AP endonuclease activity in Streptococcus mutans during growth at low pH. Mol Microbiol 31:1489–1498. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01292.x
- Mullins E, Francois J, Kappock T (2008) A specialized citric acid cycle requiring succinyl-coenzyme A (CoA):acetate CoA-transferase (AarC) confers acetic acid resistance on the acidophile Acetobacter aceti. J Bacteriol 190(14):4933–4940. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00405-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto-Kainuma A, Yan W, Fukaya M, Tukamoto Y, Ishikawa M, Koizumi Y (2004) Cloning and characterization of the dnaKJ operon in Acetobacter aceti. J Biosci Bioeng 97:339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70216-9
- Poorbagher H, Moghaddam M, Eagderi S, Farahmand H (2016) Estimating the DNA strand breakage using a fuzzy inference system and agarose gel electrophoresis, a case study with toothed carp Aphanius sophiae exposed to cypermethrin. Ecotoxicology 25(5):1040–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1647-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sancar A, Tang M (1993) Nucleotide excision repair. Photochem Photobiol 57(5):905–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1993.tb09233.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trcek J, Jernejc K, Matsushita K (2007) The highly tolerant acetic acid bacterium Gluconacetobacter europaeus adapts to the presence of acetic acid by changes in lipid composition, morphological properties and PQQ-dependent ADH expression. Extremophiles 11(4):627–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-007-0077-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia K, Zang N, Zhang J, Zhang H, Li Y, Liu Y, Feng W, Liang X (2016) New insights into the mechanisms of acetic acid resistance in Acetobacter pasteurianus using iTRAQ-dependent quantitative proteomic analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 238:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.09.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Chen X, Wang J, Yin H, Wang L, Wang M (2015) Expression of gene uvrA from Acetobacter pasteurianus and its tolerance to acetic acid in Escherichia coli. In: Zhang TC, Nakajima M (eds) Advances in Applied Biotechnology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46318-5_18 Google Scholar