Advertisement

Solubility enhancement of Cry2Aa crystal through carboxy-terminal extension and synergism between the chimeric protein and Cry1Ac

  • Xianfeng Qiu
  • Xiuqing Lu
  • Xiaomeng Ren
  • Ran Li
  • Binbin Wu
  • Sisi Yang
  • Lingling Qi
  • Xiangtao Mo
  • Xuezhi Ding
  • Liqiu Xia
  • Yunjun SunEmail author
Applied genetics and molecular biotechnology
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

It was reported that the highly conserved C-terminal region of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A protoxins was very important for parasporal crystal formation and solubility feature in alkaline environment. In order to improve the solubilization efficiency of Cry2Aa crystal, the coding sequences of Cry2Aa protein and the C-terminal half of Cry1Ac were fused seamlessly through Red/ET homologous recombination and expressed in an acrystalliferous B. thuringiensis strain under the control of the cry1Ac promoter and terminator. Microscopic observation revealed that the recombinant strain containing the chimeric gene cry2Aa-1Ac produced distinct parasporal inclusion with semispherical to approximately cuboidal shape during sporulation. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that this strain expressed stable 130-kDa Cry2Aa-1Ac chimeric protein, which was confirmed to be the correctly expressed product by LC-MS/MS. The chimeric protein inclusion could be effectively dissolved at pH 10.5 and activated by trypsin like the parental Cry1Ac crystal. While, the parental Cry2Aa crystal exhibited very low solubility under this condition. Bioassays against third-instar larvae of Helicoverpa armigera proved that the chimeric protein was more toxic than Cry2Aa. Additionally, synergistic effect was clearly detected between the chimeric protein and Cry1Ac against H. armigera, while there was only additive effect for the combination of wild Cry2Aa and Cry1Ac. These results indicated that the developed chimeric protein might serve as a potent insecticidal toxin used in the field against lepidopteran pests.

Keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Aa C-terminal half of Cry1Ac Chimeric protein Helicoverpa armigera Synergistic activity 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

XFQ and YJS designed the study and wrote the manuscript. XQL, XMR, RL, and BBW participated in the experiments. SSY, LLQ, and XTM contributed to the figures and tables. XZD and LQX analyzed the mass spectrometric data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFD0201201), Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (2015NK3032), the Training Program of Young Key Teachers in Universities of Hunan Province, Graduate Teaching Reform Program of Hunan Normal University (12JG14), and the Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology of Hunan Province (20134486), P. R. China.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This research does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Supplementary material

253_2018_9606_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
ESM. 1 (PDF 83 kb)
253_2018_9606_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (25 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 24 kb)

References

  1. Agaisse H, Lereclus D (1995) How does Bacillus thuringiensis produce so much insecticidal crystal protein? J Bacteriol 177:6027–6032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arantes O, Lereclus D (1991) Construction of cloning vectors for Bacillus thuringiensis. Gene 108:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bian X, Huang F, Stewart FA, Xia L, Zhang Y, Müller R (2012) Direct cloning, genetic engineering, and heterologous expression of the syringolin biosynthetic gene cluster in E. coli through red/ET recombineering. Chembiochem 13:1946–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmona AA, Ibarra JE (1999) Expression and crystallization of a Cry3Aa-Cry1Ac chimerical protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 15:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du C, Martin PA, Nickerson KW (1994) Comparison of disulfide contents and solubility at alkaline pH of insecticidal and noninsecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis protein crystals. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3847–3853Google Scholar
  6. Elleuch J, Zghal RZ, Jemaà M, Azzouz H, Tounsi S, Jaoua S (2014) New Bacillus thuringiensis toxin combinations for biological control of lepidopteran larvae. Int J Biol Macromol 65:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elleuch J, Zghal RZ, Ben Fguira I, Lacroix MN, Suissi J, Chandre F, Tounsi S, Jaoua S (2015) Effects of the P20 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis on insecticidal crystal protein Cry4Ba. Int J Biol Macromol 79:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu J, Bian X, Hu S, Wang H, Huang F, Seibert PM, Plaza A, Xia L, Müller R, Stewart AF, Zhang Y (2012) Full-length RecE enhances linear-linear homologous recombination and facilitates direct cloning for bioprospecting. Nat Biotechnol 30:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghosh G, Ganguly S, Purohit A, Chaudhuri RK, Das S, Chakraborti D (2017) Transgenic pigeonpea events expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Aa exhibit resistance to Helicoverpa armigera. Plant Cell Rep 36:1037–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li H, Bouwer G (2014) Evaluation of the synergistic activities of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Invertebr Pathol 121:7–13Google Scholar
  11. Lu K, Gu Y, Liu X, Lin Y, Yu XQ (2017) Possible insecticidal mechanisms mediated by immune-response-related Cry-binding proteins in the midgut juice of Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera exigua. J Agric Food Chem 65:2048–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Naimov S, Martens-Uzunova E, Weemen-Hendriks M, Dukiandjiev S, Minkov I, de Maagd RA (2006) Carboxy-terminal extension effects on crystal formation and insecticidal properties of Colorado potato beetle-active Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins. Mol Biotechnol 32:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pardo-López L, Muñoz-Garay C, Porta H, Rodríguez-Almazán C, Soberón M, Bravo A (2009) Strategies to improve the insecticidal activity of cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Peptides 30:589–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pardo-López L, Soberón M, Bravo A (2013) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park HW, Ge B, Bauer LS, Federici BA (1998) Optimization of Cry3A yields in Bacillus thuringiensis by use of sporulation-dependent promoters in combination with the STAB-SD mRNA sequence. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3932–3938Google Scholar
  16. Park HW, Hice RH, Federici BA (2016) Effect of promoters and plasmid copy number on Cyt1A synthesis and crystal assembly in Bacillus thuringiensis. Curr Microbiol 72:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peña-Cardeña A, Grande R, Sánchez J, Tabashnik BE, Bravo A, Soberón M, Gómez I (2018) The C-terminal protoxin domain of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin has a functional role in binding to GPI-anchored receptors in the insect midgut. J Biol Chem 293:20263–20272Google Scholar
  18. Peng D, Wang F, Li N, Zhang Z, Song R, Zhu Z, Ruan L, Sun M (2011) Single cysteine substitution in Bacillus thuringiensis Cry7Ba1 improves the crystal solubility and produces toxicity to Plutella xylostella larvae. Environ Microbiol 13:2820–2831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rajagopal R, Arora N, Sivakumar S, Rao NG, Nimbalkar SA, Bhatnagar RK (2009) Resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to Cry1Ac toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is due to improper processing of the protoxin. Biochem J 419:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanahuja G, Banakar R, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P (2011) Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol J 9:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806Google Scholar
  22. Shah JV, Yadav R, Ingle SS (2017) Engineered Cry1Ac-Cry9Aa hybrid Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin with improved insecticidal activity against Helicoverpa armigera. Arch Microbiol 199:1069–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sramala I, Uawithya P, Chanama U, Leetachewa S, Krittanai C, Katzenmeier G, Panyim S, Angsuthanasombat C (2000) Single proline substitutions of selected helices of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4B toxin affect inclusion solubility and larvicidal activity. J Biochem Mol Biol Biophys 4:187–193Google Scholar
  24. Sun Y, Fu Z, Ding X, Xia L (2008) Evaluating the insecticidal genes and their expressed products in Bacillus thuringiensis strains by combining PCR with mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6811–6813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabashnik BE (1992) Evaluation of synergism among Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3343–3346Google Scholar
  26. Tabashnik BE, Zhang M, Fabrick JA, Wu Y, Gao M, Huang F, Wei J, Zhang J, Yelich A, Unnithan GC, Bravo A, Soberón M, Carrière Y, Li X (2015) Dual mode of action of Bt proteins: protoxin efficacy against resistant insects. Sci Rep 5:15107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang F, Liu Y, Zhang F, Chai L, Ruan L, Peng D, Sun M (2012) Improvement of crystal solubility and increasing toxicity against Caenorhabditis elegans by asparagine substitution in block 3 of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein Cry5Ba. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7197–7204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Widner WR, Whiteley HR (1989) Two highly related insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki possess different host range specificities. J Bacteriol 171:965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu KM, Lu YH, Feng HQ, Jiang YY, Zhao JZ (2008) Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin-containing cotton. Science 321:1676–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin J, Ding X, Xia L, Yu Z, Lv Y, Hu S, Huang S, Cao Z, Xiao X (2011) Transcription of gene in an acrystalliferous strain of Bacillus thuringiensis XBU001 positively regulated by the metalloprotease camelysin gene at the onset of stationary phase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 318:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zghal RZ, Elleuch J, Ben Ali M, Darriet F, Rebaï A, Chandre F, Jaoua S, Tounsi S (2017) Towards novel cry toxins with enhanced toxicity/broader: a new chimeric Cry4Ba/Cry1Ac toxin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Y, Muyrers JP, Testa G, Stewart AF (2000) DNA cloning by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 18:1314–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang H, Wu S, Yang Y, Tabashnik BE, Wu Y (2012) Non-recessive Bt toxin resistance conferred by an intracellular cadherin mutation in field-selected populations of cotton bollworm. PLoS One 7:e53418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng A, Zhu J, Tan F, Guan P, Yu X, Wang S, Deng Q, Li S, Liu H, Li P (2010) Characterisation and expression of a novel haplotype cry2A-type gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain JF19-2. Ann Microbiol 60:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Developmental Biology of Freshwater FishHunan Normal UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations