Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 101, Issue 11, pp 4761–4773 | Cite as

Influence of straw incorporation with and without straw decomposer on soil bacterial community structure and function in a rice-wheat cropping system

  • Jun Zhao
  • Tian Ni
  • Weibing Xun
  • Xiaolei Huang
  • Qiwei HuangEmail author
  • Wei Ran
  • Biao Shen
  • Ruifu Zhang
  • Qirong Shen
Environmental biotechnology


To study the influence of straw incorporation with and without straw decomposer on bacterial community structure and biological traits, a 3-year field experiments, including four treatments: control without fertilizer (CK), chemical fertilizer (NPK), chemical fertilizer plus 7500 kg ha−1 straw incorporation (NPKS), and chemical fertilizer plus 7500 kg ha−1 straw incorporation and 300 kg ha−1 straw decomposer (NPKSD), were performed in a rice-wheat cropping system in Changshu (CS) and Jintan (JT) city, respectively. Soil samples were taken right after wheat (June) and rice (October) harvest in both sites, respectively. The NPKS and NPKSD treatments consistently increased crop yields, cellulase activity, and bacterial abundance in both sampling times and sites. Moreover, the NPKS and NPKSD treatments altered soil bacterial community structure, particularly in the wheat harvest soils in both sites, separating from the CK and NPK treatments. In the rice harvest soils, both NPKS and NPKSD treatments had no considerable impacts on bacterial communities in CS, whereas the NPKSD treatment significantly shaped bacterial communities compared to the other treatments in JT. These practices also significantly shifted the bacterial composition of unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) rather than shared OTUs. The relative abundances of copiotrophic bacteria (Proteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Actinobacteria) were positively correlated with soil total N, available N, and available P. Taken together, these results indicate that application of straw incorporation with and without straw decomposer could particularly stimulate the copiotrophic bacteria, enhance the soil biological activity, and thus, contribute to the soil productivity and sustainability in agro-ecosystems.


Straw incorporation Straw decomposer Rice-wheat cropping system Low-Middle Yangtze River plain Bacterial community structure 



This research was financially supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150502), the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, the 111 Project (B12009), the National Infrastructure of Microbial Resources (NIRM), and the Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province (CXZZ13_0301). We also would like to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments, which significantly improved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

253_2017_8170_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (623 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 623 kb)


  1. Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker BJ, Sheik CS, Taylor CA, Jain S, Bhasi A, Cavalcoli JD, Dick GJ (2013) Community transcriptomic assembly reveals microbes that contribute to deep-sea carbon and nitrogen cycling. ISME J 7(10):1962–1973CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat AK (2013) Preserving microbial diversity of soil ecosystem: a key to sustainable productivity. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2(8):85–101Google Scholar
  4. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009) Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28(3):139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17(6):837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao G, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zheng F (2008) Estimation of emissions from field burning of crop straw in China. Chinese Sci Bull 53(5):784–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dick RP (1994) Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication 35, Soil Sci Soc Am. Madison, USA, pp 107–124Google Scholar
  8. Dick RP, Pankhurst C, Doube BM, Gupta V (1997) Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst C, Doube BM, Gupta V (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 121–156Google Scholar
  9. Dick RP, Rasmussen PE, Kerle EA (1988) Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activities in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system. Biol Fert Soils 6(2):159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27(16):2194–2200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Eilers KG, Lauber CL, Knight R, Fierer N (2010) Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42(6):896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88(6):1354–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Han W, He M (2010) The application of exogenous cellulase to improve soil fertility and plant growth due to acceleration of straw decomposition. Bioresource Technol 101(10):3724–3731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kandeler E, Stemmer M, Klimanek E-M (1999) Response of soil microbial biomass, urease and xylanase within particle size fractions to long-term soil management. Soil Biol Biochem 31(2):261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kautz T, Wirth S, Ellmer F (2004) Microbial activity in a sandy arable soil is governed by the fertilization regime. Eur J Soil Biol 40(2):87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy AC, Smith KL (1995) Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant Soil 170(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy NM, Gleeson DE, Connolly J, Clipson NJW (2005) Seasonal and management influences on bacterial community structure in an upland grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53(3):329–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kikuchi H, Watanabe T, Jia Z, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2007) Molecular analyses reveal stability of bacterial communities in bulk soil of a Japanese paddy field: estimation by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rRNA genes amplified from DNA accompanied with RNA. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53(4):448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim B-S, Kim BK, Lee J-H, Kim M, Lim YW, Chun J (2008) Rapid phylogenetic dissection of prokaryotic community structure in tidal flat using pyrosequencing. J Microbiol 46(4):357–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladha JK, Khind CS, Gupta RK, Meelu OP, Pasuquin E (2004) Long-term effects of organic inputs on yield and soil fertility in the rice-wheat rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(3):845–853Google Scholar
  21. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129(2):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu H, Jiang GM, Zhuang HY, Wang KJ (2008) Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: with special references of crop residues. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(5):1402–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu S, Huang D, Chen A, Wei W, Brookes PC, Li Y, Wu J (2014) Differential responses of crop yields and soil organic carbon stock to fertilization and rice straw incorporation in three cropping systems in the subtropics. Agr Ecosyst Enviro 184:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamura A, Tun CC, Asakawa S, Kimura M (2003) Microbial community responsible for the decomposition of rice straw in a paddy field: estimation by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Biol Fert Soils 38(5):288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini M, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54(4):655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nossa CW, Oberdorf WE, Yang L, Aas JA, Paster BJ, DeSantis TZ, Brodie EL, Malamud D, Poles MA, Pei Z (2010) Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome. World J Gastroentero 16(33):4135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pianka ER (1970) On r-and K-selection. Am Nat 104(940):592–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pimentel D, Stachow U, Takacs DA, Brubaker HW, Dumas AR, Meaney JJ, O'Neil JAS, Onsi DE, Corzilius DB (1992) Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems. Bioscience:354–362Google Scholar
  29. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35(21):7188–7196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Qin S, Jiao K, Lyu D, Shi L, Liu L (2015) Effects of maize residue and cellulose-decomposing bacteria inocula on soil microbial community, functional diversity, organic fractions, and growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. Arch Agron Soil Sci 61(2):173–184Google Scholar
  31. Quince C, Lanzen A, Davenport RJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics 12(1):38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, vol 2012. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramirez KS, Craine JM, Fierer N (2012) Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Glob Chang Biol 18(6):1918–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramirez KS, Lauber CL, Knight R, Bradford MA, Fierer N (2010) Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in contrasting systems. Ecology 91(12):3463–3470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reddy AP, Simmons CW, D’haeseleer P, Khudyakov J, Burd H, Hadi M, Simmons BA, Singer SW, Thelen MP, Vander Gheynst JS (2013) Discovery of microorganisms and enzymes involved in high-solids decomposition of rice straw using metagenomic analyses. PLoS One 8(10):e77985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Schrijver AD, Mot RD (1999) Degradation of pesticides by actinomycetes. Crit Rev Microbiol 25(2):85–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheneman L, Evans J, Foster JA (2006) Clearcut: a fast implementation of relaxed neighbor joining. Bioinformatics 22(22):2823–2824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun L, Xun W, Huang T, Zhang G, Gao J, Ran W, Li D, Shen Q, Zhang R (2016) Alteration of the soil bacterial community during parent material maturation driven by different fertilization treatments. Soil Biol Biochem 96:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun R, Zhang X-X, Guo X, Wang D, Chu H (2015) Bacterial diversity in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization can be more stably maintained with the addition of livestock manure than wheat straw. Soil Biol Biochem 88:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tirol-Padre A, Tsuchiya K, Inubushi K, Ladha JK (2005) Enhancing soil quality through residue management in a rice-wheat system in Fukuoka, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 51(6):849–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Lu CA (2015a) Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 102(3):371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang J, Xue C, Song Y, Wang L, Huang Q, Shen Q (2016) Wheat and rice growth stages and fertilization regimes alter soil bacterial community structure, but not diversity. Front Microbiol 7:1207PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang W, Lai DYF, Wang C, Pan T, Zeng C (2015b) Effects of rice straw incorporation on active soil organic carbon pools in a subtropical paddy field. Soil Till Res 152:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu F, Jia Z, Wang S, Chang SX, Startsev A (2013) Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activities in a Chernozemic soil. Biol Fert Soils 49(5):555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xun W, Zhao J, Xue C, Zhang G, Ran W, Wang B, Shen Q, Zhang R (2016) Significant alteration of soil bacterial communities and organic carbon decomposition by different long-term fertilization management conditions of extremely low-productivity arable soil in South China. Environ Microbiol 18(6):1907–1917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao J, Ni T, Li J, Lu Q, Fang Z, Huang Q, Zhang R, Li R, Shen B, Shen Q (2016) Effects of organic–inorganic compound fertilizer with reduced chemical fertilizer application on crop yields, soil biological activity and bacterial community structure in a rice–wheat cropping system. Appl Soil Ecol 99:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao J, Ni T, Li Y, Xiong W, Ran W, Shen B, Shen Q, Zhang R (2014a) Responses of bacterial communities in arable soils in a rice-wheat cropping system to different fertilizer regimes and sampling times. PLoS One 9(1):e85301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao J, Zhang R, Xue C, Xun W, Sun L, Xu Y, Shen Q (2014b) Pyrosequencing reveals contrasting soil bacterial diversity and community structure of two main winter wheat cropping systems in China. Microb Ecol 67(2):443–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jiangsu Key Lab for Organic Waste UtilizationNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of AgricultureInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations