Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 227–242 | Cite as

Iterative key-residues interrogation of a phytase with thermostability increasing substitutions identified in directed evolution

  • Amol V. Shivange
  • Danilo Roccatano
  • Ulrich Schwaneberg
Biotechnologically relevant enzymes and proteins

Abstract

Bacterial phytases have attracted industrial interest as animal feed supplement due to their high activity and sufficient thermostability (required for feed pelleting). We devised an approach named KeySIDE,  an iterative Key-residues interrogation of the wild type with Substitutions Identified in Directed Evolution for improving Yersinia mollaretii phytase (Ymphytase) thermostability by combining key beneficial substitutions and elucidating their individual roles. Directed evolution yielded in a discovery of nine positions in Ymphytase and combined iteratively to identify key positions. The “best” combination (M6: T77K, Q154H, G187S, and K289Q) resulted in significantly improved thermal resistance; the residual activity improved from 35 % (wild type) to 89 % (M6) at 58 °C and 20-min incubation. Melting temperature increased by 3 °C in M6 without a loss of specific activity. Molecular dynamics simulation studies revealed reduced flexibility in the loops located next to helices (B, F, and K) which possess substitutions (Helix-B: T77K, Helix-F: G187S, and Helix-K: K289E/Q). Reduced flexibility in the loops might be caused by strengthened hydrogen bonding network (e.g., G187S and K289E/K289Q) and a salt bridge (T77K). Our results demonstrate a promising approach to design phytases in food research, and we hope that the KeySIDE might become an attractive approach for understanding of structure–function relationships of enzymes.

Keywords

Directed evolution KeySIDE Molecular dynamics simulations Phytase Thermostability Protein engineering 

Supplementary material

253_2015_6959_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.2 mb)
ESM 1Fig. S1. PROCHECK-Ramachandran plot for the homology model of Ymphytase. Fig. S2 3D-profile window plots for Ymphytase homology model. The vertical axis shows the average 3D-1D score for the residue and horizontal line indicate residue number in the model. The residues with average positive score in 3D-1D slide window are reasonably folded. Fig. S3 Radius of gyration of the backbone atoms (Cα, N, C) of Ymphytase throughout the simulation of wild-type (a; Wt) and variant M6 (b). Fig. S4 Structural topology of Ymphytase model obtained from molecular dynamics simulation. Fig. S5 Hydrogen bonding network of Ymphytase wild-type deciphered by MD simulation. Amino acid residue G187 showed no hydrogen bonds with loop-G6 (a), T77 did not show any hydrogen bonds with D122 (b), K289 showed 2 – 3 hydrogen bonds with helix-L (c) but the frequency of second hydrogen bond was less compare to variant M6 and negligible hydrogen bonds with loop-CD (d). Fig. S6 Salt bridge analysis of T77K with D122 showing the minimum distance between residues K77 and D122 throughout the simulation time. The average distance between K77 and D122 was 0.37 nm showing a salt bridge interaction (centroids of the side-chain charged group atoms in the residues lie within 0.4 nm of each other). Fig. S7 A tetrameric model of Ymphytase constructed by superimposing monomers to biological assembly of D. castellii phytase (PDB ID: 2GFI). Substitutions in Ymphytase variant M6 are shown in orange colored space filled model. Highly flexible loops observed in MD simulation (L92-T102, N247-P252, and Q304-Q317) are shown in red color. Residues involved in inter-monomer interaction calculated using PIC server (http://crick.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/∼PIC/) are depicted in purple (hydrophobic interactions), yellow (ionic interactions), and blue (hydrogen bonding interactions) color. Fig. S8 Hydrogen bonding network of Ymphytase residue Q154 in wild-type (a) and substitution Q154H in variant M6 over the time of MD simulation. Hydrogen bonds were calculated between residue 154 and the protein molecule. Table S1 Sequence of the primers used for site-directed and site saturation mutagenesis. Table S2 Classification and mutational pattern of the variants identified in the 2nd round of SeSaM library screening. Table S3 Available templates for homology modeling of YmPhytase (*selected template). Fig. S9 Structure-sequence alignment of template and query sequence based on dynamic programming algorithm of MODELLER for YmPhytase. Fig. S10 Activity-pH profile of the Ymphytase wildtype and variant M3 and M6. (DOCX 2227 kb)

References

  1. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC (1993) Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 17(4):412–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J (1981) Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Intermolecular Forces. D Reidel Publishing Company, The Netherlands, pp 331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Dinola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81(8):3684–3690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91(1-3):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billington DC (1993) The Inositol phosphates: chemical synthesis and biological significance. Weinheim, VCH VerlagsgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanusa M, Schenk A, Sadeghi H, Marienhagen J, Schwaneberg U (2010) Phosphorothioate-based ligase-independent gene cloning (PLICing): An enzyme-free and sequence-independent cloning method. Anal Biochem 406(2):141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blattmann BO, Darzins A, Davis JM, Encell LP, Morrison TB, Mrachko GT, Schellenberger V (2011) Mutant E. coli appa phytase enzymes and natural variants thereof, nucleic acids encoding such phytase enzymes, vectors and host cells incorporating same and methods of making and using same. Patent US7968342 B2, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohm K, Herter T, Muller JJ, Borriss R, Heinemann U (2010) Crystal structure of Klebsiella sp. ASR1 phytase suggests substrate binding to a preformed active site that meets the requirements of a plant rhizosphere enzyme. FEBS J 277(5):1284–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohn L, Meyer AS, Rasmussen SK (2008) Phytate: impact on environment and human nutrition. A challenge for molecular breeding. J Zhejiang Univ (Sci) 9(3):165–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castrignano T, De Meo PD, Cozzetto D, Talamo IG, Tramontano A (2006) The PMDB Protein Model Database. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Database issue):D306–D309. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj105 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavazza C (2000) Carnitine and inositol phosphate-containing composition useful as dietary supplement or drug. WO Patent WO 0064426 A2, 2000Google Scholar
  12. Copeland RA (2000) Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowieson A, Cooper R (2010) Introduction to the event and overview of the phytase market. In: International Phytase Summit. International Phytase Summit, Washington, D.C. USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: An N [center-dot] log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98(12):10089–10092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daura X, Gademann K, Jaun B, Seebach D, van Gunsteren W, Mark A (1999) Peptide Folding: When Simulation Meets Experiment. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 38(1-2):236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fei B, Xu H, Cao Y, Ma S, Guo H, Song T, Qiao D, Cao Y (2013) A multi-factors rational design strategy for enhancing the thermostability of Escherichia coli AppA phytase. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 40(5):457–464. doi:10.1007/s10295-013-1260-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrett JB, Kretz KA, O’Donoghue E, Kerovuo J, Kim W, Barton NR, Hazlewood GP, Short JM, Robertson DE, Gray KA (2004) Enhancing the thermal tolerance and gastric performance of a microbial phytase for use as a phosphate-mobilizing monogastric-feed supplement. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(5):3041–3046PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guex N, Peitsch MC (1997) SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18(15):2714–2723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harland BF, Oberleas D (1999) Phytase in animal nutrition and waste management. BASF Reference Manual: 45:237–240Google Scholar
  20. Hutchison CA, Phillips S, Edgell MH, Gillam S, Jahnke P, Smith M (1978) Mutagenesis at a specific position in a DNA sequence. J Biol Chem 253(18):6551–6560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim MS, Lei XG (2008) Enhancing thermostability of Escherichia coli phytase AppA2 by error-prone PCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79(1):69–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim MS, Weaver JD, Lei XG (2008) Assembly of mutations for improving thermostability of Escherichia coli AppA2 phytase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79(5):751–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kostrewa D, Wyss M, D’Arcy A, van Loon AP (1999) Crystal structure of Aspergillus niger pH 2.5 acid phosphatase at 2. 4 A resolution. J Mol Biol 288(5):965–974. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2736 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (2000) Factors enhancing protein thermostability. Protein Eng 13(3):179–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laskowski RA, Macarthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) {PROCHECK}: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 26:283–291, citeulike-article-id:1720734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lei X (2013) Phytases with improved thermal stability. Patent US8540984 B2, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim D, Golovan S, Forsberg CW, Jia Z (2000) Crystal structures of Escherichia coli phytase and its complex with phytate. Nat Struct Biol 7(2):108–113. doi:10.1038/72371 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7(8):306–317Google Scholar
  29. Lindqvist Y, Schneider G, Vihko P (1993) Three-dimensional structure of rat acid phosphatase in complex with L(+)-tartrate. J Biol Chem 268(28):20744–20746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356(6364):83–85. doi:10.1038/356083a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miasnikov A, Kumar V, Kensch O, Pellangahr K, Leuthner B, Kettling U, Koltermann A (2012) Mutant Citrobacter freundii phytase polypeptide. Patent US8143045 B2, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Miyamoto S, Kollman P (1992) Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J Comput Chem 13(8):952–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noorbatcha IA, Sultan AM, Salleh HM, Amid A (2013) Understanding thermostability factors of Aspergillus niger PhyA phytase: a molecular dynamics study. Protein J 32(4):309–316. doi:10.1007/s10930-013-9489-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reetz MT, Carballeira JD, Vogel A (2006a) Iterative saturation mutagenesis on the basis of B factors as a strategy for increasing protein thermostability. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45(46):7745–7751. doi:10.1002/anie.200602795 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reetz MT, Wang LW, Bocola M (2006b) Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes: iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45(8):1236–1241. doi:10.1002/anie.200502746 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23(3):327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sali A (1996) Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Immunotechnology 2:279–280Google Scholar
  39. Salverda ML, Dellus E, Gorter FA, Debets AJ, van der Oost J, Hoekstra RF, Tawfik DS, de Visser JA (2011) Initial mutations direct alternative pathways of protein evolution. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1001321. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001321 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanchez-Romero I, Ariza A, Wilson KS, Skjot M, Vind J, De Maria L, Skov LK, Sanchez-Ruiz JM (2013) Mechanism of protein kinetic stabilization by engineered disulfide crosslinks. PLoS One 8(7):e70013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070013 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandberg A, Brune M, Carlsson N, Hallberg L, Skoglund E, Rossander-Hulthen L (1999) Inositol phosphates with different numbers of phosphate groups influence iron absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 70(2):240–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott WRP, Hunenberger PH, Tironi IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, Torda AE, Huber T, Kruger P, van Gunsteren WF (1999) The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package. J Phys Chem A 103(19):3596–3607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sebastian S, Touchburn SP, Chavez ER (1998) Implications of phytic acid and supplemental microbial phytase in poultry nutrition: a review. World Poultry Sci J 54(01):27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shivange AV, Marienhagen J, Mundhada H, Schenk A, Schwaneberg U (2009) Advances in generating functional diversity for directed protein evolution. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(1):19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shivange AV, Schwaneberg U, Roccatano D (2010) Conformational dynamics of active site loop in Escherichia coli phytase. Biopolymers 93(11):994–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shivange AV, Serwe A, Dennig A, Roccatano D, Haefner S, Schwaneberg U (2012) Directed evolution of a highly active Yersinia mollaretii phytase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95(2):405–418. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3756-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shivange AV, Dennig A, Schwaneberg U (2014) Multi-site saturation by OmniChange yields a pH- and thermally improved phytase. J Biotechnol 170:68–72. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.11.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Studier FW (2005) Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif 41(1):207–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian YS, Peng RH, Xu J, Zhao W, Gao F, Fu XY, Xiong AS, Yao QH (2011) Semi-rational site-directed mutagenesis of phyI1s from Aspergillus niger 113 at two residue to improve its phytase activity. Mol Biol Rep 38(2):977–982. doi:10.1007/s11033-010-0192-1
  50. Tracewell CA, Arnold FH (2009) Directed enzyme evolution: climbing fitness peaks one amino acid at a time. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.01.017 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tung ET, Ma HW, Cheng C, Lim BL, Wong KB (2008) Stabilization of beta-propeller phytase by introducing Xaa-->Pro and Gly-->Ala substitutions at consensus positions. Protein Pept Lett 15(3):297–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26(16):1701–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vogt G, Woell S, Argos P (1997) Protein thermal stability, hydrogen bonds, and ion pairs. J Mol Biol 269:631–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wong TS, Roccatano D, Loakes D, Tee KL, Schenk A, Hauer B, Schwaneberg U (2008) Transversion-enriched sequence saturation mutagenesis (SeSaM-Tv+): a random mutagenesis method with consecutive nucleotide exchanges that complements the bias of error-prone PCR. Biotechnol J 3(1):74–82. doi:10.1002/biot.200700193 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wyss M, Pasamontes L, Friedlein A, Remy R, Tessier M, Kronenberger A, Middendorf A, Lehmann M, Schnoebelen L, Rothlisberger U, Kusznir E, Wahl G, Muller F, Lahm HW, Vogel K, van Loon AP (1999) Biophysical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): molecular size, glycosylation pattern, and engineering of proteolytic resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(2):359–366PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang W, Mullaney EJ, Lei XG (2007) Adopting selected hydrogen bonding and ionic interactions from Aspergillus fumigatus phytase structure improves the thermostability of Aspergillus niger PhyA phytase. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(9):3069–3076. doi:10.1128/AEM.02970-06 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao Q, Liu H, Zhang Y (2010) Engineering of protease-resistant phytase from Penicillium sp.: high thermal stability, low optimal temperature and pH. J Biosci Bioeng 110(6):638–645. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.08.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu W, Qiao D, Huang M, Yang G, Xu H, Cao Y (2010) Modifying thermostability of appA from Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 61(4):267–273. doi:10.1007/s00284-010-9606-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amol V. Shivange
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Danilo Roccatano
    • 2
  • Ulrich Schwaneberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für BiotechnologieRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.School of Engineering and ScienceJacobs University Bremen gGmbHBremenGermany
  3. 3.Present Address: Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations