Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 661–671 | Cite as

Expression of a codon-optimised recombinant Ara h 2.02 peanut allergen in Escherichia coli

Biotechnologically relevant enzymes and proteins

Abstract

Current diagnostic tools for peanut allergy using crude peanut extract showed low predictive value and reduced specificity for detection of peanut allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). The Ara h 2.02, an isoform of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2, contains three IgE epitope recognition sequence of ‘DPYSPS’ and may be a better reagent for component resolve diagnosis. This research aimed to generate a codon-optimised Ara h 2.02 gene for heterologous expression in Escherichia coli and allergenicity study of this recombinant protein. The codon-optimised gene was generated by PCR using overlapping primers and cloned into the pET-28a (+) expression vector. Moderate expression of a 22.5 kDa 6xhistidine-tagged recombinant Ara h 2.02 protein (6xHis-rAra h 2.02) in BL21 (DE3) host cells was observed upon induction with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The insoluble recombinant protein was purified under denaturing condition using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography and refolded by dialysis in decreasing urea concentration, amounting to a yield of 74 mg/l of expression culture. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) and immunoblot analysis confirmed the production of the recombinant 6xHis-rAra h 2.02. The refolded recombinant 6xHis-rAra h 2.02, with or without adjuvant, was able to elicit comparable level of allergen-specific IgE and IgG1 in sensitised Balb/c mice. In addition, the specific IgE antibodies raised against the recombinant protein were able to recognise the native Ara h 2 protein, demonstrating its allergenicity and potential as a reagent for diagnosis and therapeutic study.

Keywords

Peanut allergen Ara h 2.02 Codon optimise pET-28a (+) vector Escherichia coli 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Research Grant Scheme (Proj-In-FAS-010) from Centre of Excellence for Research, Value Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CERVIE), UCSI University, Malaysia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The ethics for research involving animals was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Applied Sciences, UCSI University.

References

  1. Awate S, Babiuk LA, Mutwiri G (2013) Mechanisms of action of adjuvants. Front Immunol:114. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2013.00114
  2. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun LJ, Tyagi A, Perkins S, Carpenter J, Sylvester D, Guy M, Kristensen D, Chen D (2009) Development of a freeze-stable formulation for vaccines containing aluminum salt adjuvants. Vaccine:72-9. doi:  10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.027
  4. Burks W, Sampson HA, Bannon GA (1998) Peanut allergens. Allergy:725-730. doi:  10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03967.x
  5. Chatel JM, Bernard H, Orson FM (2003) Isolation and characterization of two complete Ara h 2 isoforms cDNA. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 131(1):14–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Amici M, Ciprandi G (2013) The age impact on serum total and allergen-specific IgE. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research:170-174. doi:  10.4168/aair.2013.5.3.170
  7. Debeljak N, Feldman L, Davis KL, Komel R, Sytkowski AJ (2006) Variability in the immunodetection of His-tagged recombinant proteins. Anal Biochem:216-23. doi:  10.1016/j.ab.2006.09.017
  8. El Mezayen R, Pons L, Burks AW, West M, Stanley S, El Gazzar M, Duncan MW, Hansen KC, Dreskin SC (2007) Ara H 2.02 is a more potent cross-linker of anti-peanut IgE than is Ara H 2.01. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology:S193. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.124
  9. Finkelman FD (2010) Peanut allergy and anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Immunol:783-8. doi:  10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.005
  10. Finkelman FD, Rothenberg ME, Brandt EB, Morris SC, Strait RT (2005) Molecular mechanisms of anaphylaxis: lessons from studies with murine models. J Allergy Clin Immunol:449-57; quiz 458. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1125
  11. GenScript (2015) GenScript Rare Codon Analysis Tool, http://www.genscript.com/cgi-bin/tools/rare_codon_analysis Accessed 17 April 2015
  12. Glenting J, Poulsen LK, Kato K, Madsen SM, Frokiaer H, Wendt C, Sorensen HW (2007) Production of Recombinant Peanut Allergen Ara h 2 using Lactococcus lactis. Microb Cell Fact:28. doi:  10.1186/1475-2859-6-28
  13. Hales BJ, Bosco A, Mills KL, Hazell LA, Loh R, Holt PG, Thomas WR (2004) Isoforms of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2: IgE binding in children with peanut allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol:101-7. doi:  10.1159/000080652
  14. Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166(4):557–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Invitrogen (2006) Ni-NTA purification system: for purification of polyhistidine-containing recombinant proteins User Manual:2-15.Google Scholar
  16. Jacysyn JF, Abrahamsohn IA, Macedo MS (2001) Modulation of delayed-type hypersensitivity during the time course of immune response to a protein antigen. Immunology:373-379. doi:  10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01181.x
  17. Janefjord C (2006) Th1, Th2 and Treg associated factors in relation to allergy. Dissertation, Linköping UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeong KY, Hong C-S, Lee J-S, Park J-W (2011) Optimization of allergen standardization. Yonsei Medical Journal:393-400. doi:  10.3349/ymj.2011.52.3.393
  19. Johnson BH, Hecht MH (1994) Recombinant proteins can be isolated from E. Coli cells by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing. Nat Biotech 12(13):1357–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koplin JJ, Peters RL, Ponsonby AL, Gurrin LC, Hill D, Tang ML, Dharmage SC, Allen KJ (2014) Increased risk of peanut allergy in infants of Asian-born parents compared to those of Australian-born parents. Allergy:1639-47. doi:  10.1111/all.12487
  21. Kumar A, Tiwari S, Thavaselvam D, Sathyaseelan K, Prakash A, Barua A, Arora S, Kameswara Rao M (2012) Optimization and efficient purification of recombinant Omp28 protein of Brucella melitensis using Triton X-100 and beta-mercaptoethanol. Protein Expr Purif:226-32. doi:  10.1016/j.pep.2012.04.002
  22. Lee AJ, Thalayasingam M, Lee BW (2013) Food allergy in Asia: how does it compare? Asia Pac Allergy:3-14. doi:  10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.1.3
  23. Lehmann K, Hoffmann S, Neudecker P, Suhr M, Becker WM, Rosch P (2003) High-yield expression in Escherichia coli, purification, and characterization of properly folded major peanut allergen Ara h 2. Protein Expr Purif 31(2):250–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim LH, Li HY, Cheong N, Lee BW, Chua KY (2004) High-level expression of a codon optimized recombinant dust mite allergen, Blo t 5, in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun:991-6. doi:  10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.02.148
  25. Lorenz AR, Scheurer S, Haustein D, Vieths S (2001) Recombinant food allergens. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 756(756):255–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mueller GA, Gosavi RA, Pomes A, Wunschmann S, Moon AF, London RE, Pedersen LC (2011) Ara h 2: crystal structure and IgE binding distinguish two subpopulations of peanut allergic patients by epitope diversity. Allergy:878-85. doi:  10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02532.x
  27. Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T (2000) Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):292PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palidwor GA, Perkins TJ, Xia X (2010) A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias. PLoS One:e13431. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0013431
  29. Pali-Scholl I, Szollosi H, Starkl P, Scheicher B, Stremnitzer C, Hofmeister A, Roth-Walter F, Lukschal A, Diesner SC, Zimmer A, Jensen-Jarolim E (2013) Protamine nanoparticles with CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide prevent an allergen-induced Th2-response in BALB/c mice. Eur J Pharm Biopharm:656-64. doi:  10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.03.003
  30. Qiagen (2003) A handbook for high-level expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged proteins. The QIAexpressionist™: .Google Scholar
  31. Rajan TV (2003) The Gell-Coombs classification of hypersensitivity reactions: a re-interpretation. Trends Immunol 24(7):376–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharp PM, Li WH (1987) The codon adaptation index—a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 1281–95Google Scholar
  33. Shek LP, Cabrera-Morales EA, Soh SE, Gerez I, Ng PZ, Yi FC, Ma S, Lee BW (2010) A population-based questionnaire survey on the prevalence of peanut, tree nut, and shellfish allergy in 2 Asian populations. J Allergy Clin Immunol:324-31, 331.e1-7. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.003
  34. Shin H-C (2001) Protein folding, misfolding, and refolding of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering:237-243. doi:  10.1007/BF02931984
  35. Simpson RJ (2010) Stabilization of proteins for storage. Cold Spring Harb Protoc:pdb.top79. doi:  10.1101/pdb.top79
  36. Singh SM, Panda AK (2005) Solubilization and refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. J Biosci Bioeng:303-10. doi:  10.1263/jbb.99.303
  37. Steinman H, Ruden S (2008) Native & recombinant allergen components: allergy—which allergens? ImmunoCap 5(12):5–12Google Scholar
  38. Wilcock LK, Francis JN, Durham SR (2004) Aluminium hydroxide promotes Th1 responses by peripheral blood-mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from grass pollen-allergic subjects. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology:S107. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.371

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied SciencesUCSI UniversityCherasMalaysia

Personalised recommendations