SUMO expression shortens the lag phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast growth caused by complex interactive effects of major mixed fermentation inhibitors found in hot-compressed water-treated lignocellulosic hydrolysate
- 562 Downloads
The complex inhibitory effects of inhibitors present in lignocellulose hydrolysate suppress the ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although the interactive inhibitory effects play important roles in the actual hydrolysate, few studies have investigated glycolaldehyde, the key inhibitor of hot-compressed water-treated lignocellulose hydrolysate. Given this challenge, we investigated the interactive effects of mixed fermentation inhibitors, including glycolaldehyde. First, we confirmed that glycolaldehyde was the most potent inhibitor in the hydrolysate and exerted interactive inhibitory effects in combination with major inhibitors. Next, through genome-wide analysis and megavariate data modeling, we identified SUMOylation as a novel potential mechanism to overcome the combinational inhibitory effects of fermentation inhibitors. Indeed, overall SUMOylation was increased and Pgk1, which produces an ATP molecule in glycolysis by substrate-level phosphorylation, was SUMOylated and degraded in response to glycolaldehyde. Augmenting the SUMO-dependent ubiquitin system in the ADH1-expressing strain significantly shortened the lag phase of growth, released cells from G2/M arrest, and improved energy status and glucose uptake in the inhibitor-containing medium. In summary, our study was the first to establish SUMOylation as a novel platform for regulating the lag phase caused by complex fermentation inhibitors.
KeywordsSUMOylation Yeast Glycolaldehyde Bioethanol
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Makoto Kitabatake at Kyoto University for providing ubiquitin-expressing plasmid and Prof. Hiroshi Takagi at Nara Institute of Technology for the valuable discussions. Part of this study was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI 24580117 (to HK).
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Auguilera J, Preito JA (2008) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae aldose reductase is implied in the metabolism of methylglyoxal in response to stress condition. Curr Genet 39:273–283Google Scholar
- Chaturvedi V, Verma P (2013) An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products. 3Biotech 3:415–431Google Scholar
- Fischer RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- Jayakody LN, Hayashi N, Kitagaki H (2013b) Material and process for energy: communicating current research and technology development. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Molecular mechanisms for detoxification of major aldehyde inhibitors for production of bioethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae from hot-compressed water-treated lignocelluloses. Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, pp 302–311Google Scholar
- Kawahata M, Masaki K, Fujii T, Iefuji H (2006) Yeast genes involved in response to lactic acid and acetic acid: acidic conditions caused by the organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures induce expression of intracellular metal metabolism genes regulated by Aft1p. FEMS Yeast Res 6:924–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma M, Liu ZL (2010) Comparative transcriptome profiling analyses during the lag phase uncover YAP1, PDR1, PDR3, RPN4, and HSF1 as key regulatory genes in genomic adaptation to the lignocellulose derived inhibitor HMF for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11:660PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matmati N, Kitagaki H, Montefusco D, Mohanty BK, Hannun YA (2009) Hydroxyurea sensitivity reveals a role for ISC1 in the regulation of G2/M. J Biol Chem 284:8241–8246Google Scholar
- Pereira BF, Guimarães PMR, Gomes DG, Mira NP, Teixeira MC, Sá-Correia I, Domingues L (2011) Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem 40:3693–4000Google Scholar
- Skerker JM, Leon D, Price MN, Mar JS, Tarjan DR, Wetmore KM, Deutschbauer AM, Baumohl JK, Bauer S, Ibáñez AB, Mitchell VD, Wu CH, Hu P, Hazen T, Arkin AP (2013) Dissecting a complex chemical stress: chemogenomic profiling of plant hydrolysates. Mol Syst Biol 18:674Google Scholar
- Srikumar T, Lewicki MC, Raught B (2013) A global S. cerevisiae small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) system interactome. Mol Syst Biol 9:688Google Scholar
- van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA (1986) Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 32:199–224Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar