Biofilm bacterial communities in urban drinking water distribution systems transporting waters with different purification strategies
- 1.2k Downloads
Biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) has many adverse consequences. Knowledge of microbial community structure of DWDS biofilm can aid in the design of an effective control strategy. However, biofilm bacterial community in real DWDS and the impact of drinking water purification strategy remain unclear. The present study investigated the composition and diversity of biofilm bacterial community in real DWDSs transporting waters with different purification strategies (conventional treatment and integrated treatment). High-throughput Illumina MiSeq sequencing analysis illustrated a large shift in the diversity and structure of biofilm bacterial community in real DWDS. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, and Cyanobacteria were the major components of biofilm bacterial community. Proteobacteria (mainly Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria) predominated in each DWDS biofilm, but the compositions of the dominant proteobacterial classes and genera and their proportions varied among biofilm samples. Drinking water purification strategy could shape DWDS biofilm bacterial community. Moreover, Pearson’s correlation analysis indicated that Actinobacteria was positively correlated with the levels of total alkalinity and dissolved organic carbon in tap water, while Firmicutes had a significant positive correlation with nitrite nitrogen.
KeywordsBiofilm Distribution system Microbial community Illumina sequencing Pipe Proteobacteria
This work was financially supported by the State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control (No. MARC2012D010), National Water Special Program (No. 2012ZX07404-002), and International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (No. 2010DFA91830).
- Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grigorescu AS, Hozalski RM, LaPara TM (2012) Haloacetic acid-degrading bacterial communities in drinking water systems as determined by cultivation and by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified haloacid dehalogenase gene fragments. J Appl Microbiol 112:809–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu G, Bakker GL, Li S, Vreeburg JHG, Verberk JQJC, Medema GJ, Liu WT, Van Dijk JC (2014a) Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial communities in unchlorinated drinking water distribution system: an integral study of bulk water, suspended solids, loose deposits, and pipe wall biofilm. Environ Sci Technol 48:5467–5476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JX, Zhang XL, Liu Y, Xie SG, Liu YG (2014) Bacterioplankton communities in a high-altitude freshwater wetland. Ann Microbiol 64:1045–1411Google Scholar