Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 98, Issue 20, pp 8413–8431 | Cite as

Sustainable conversion of coffee and other crop wastes to biofuels and bioproducts using coupled biochemical and thermochemical processes in a multi-stage biorefinery concept

  • Stephen R. Hughes
  • Juan Carlos López-Núñez
  • Marjorie A. Jones
  • Bryan R. Moser
  • Elby J. Cox
  • Mitch Lindquist
  • Luz Ángela Galindo-Leva
  • Néstor M. Riaño-Herrera
  • Nelson Rodriguez-Valencia
  • Fernando Gast
  • David L. Cedeño
  • Ken Tasaki
  • Robert C. Brown
  • Al Darzins
  • Lane Brunner
Open Access


The environmental impact of agricultural waste from the processing of food and feed crops is an increasing concern worldwide. Concerted efforts are underway to develop sustainable practices for the disposal of residues from the processing of such crops as coffee, sugarcane, or corn. Coffee is crucial to the economies of many countries because its cultivation, processing, trading, and marketing provide employment for millions of people. In coffee-producing countries, improved technology for treatment of the significant amounts of coffee waste is critical to prevent ecological damage. This mini-review discusses a multi-stage biorefinery concept with the potential to convert waste produced at crop processing operations, such as coffee pulping stations, to valuable biofuels and bioproducts using biochemical and thermochemical conversion technologies. The initial bioconversion stage uses a mutant Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast strain to produce bioethanol from sugars. The resulting sugar-depleted solids (mostly protein) can be used in a second stage by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica to produce bio-based ammonia for fertilizer and are further degraded by Y. lipolytica proteases to peptides and free amino acids for animal feed. The lignocellulosic fraction can be ground and treated to release sugars for fermentation in a third stage by a recombinant cellulosic Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can also be engineered to express valuable peptide products. The residual protein and lignin solids can be jet cooked and passed to a fourth-stage fermenter where Rhodotorula glutinis converts methane into isoprenoid intermediates. The residues can be combined and transferred into pyrocracking and hydroformylation reactions to convert ammonia, protein, isoprenes, lignins, and oils into renewable gas. Any remaining waste can be thermoconverted to biochar as a humus soil enhancer. The integration of multiple technologies for treatment of coffee waste has the potential to contribute to economic and environmental sustainability.


Coffee waste Multi-stage biorefinery Oleaginous yeast triglycerides Renewable biofuel Bioprocessing 


Economic importance of coffee

Coffee is said to be the second most traded commodity in the world after petroleum, signifying its importance to the global economy (ACDI/VOCA 2014, Beelarts 2011). More than 2.3 billion cups of coffee are consumed in the world every day. Most consumption takes place in industrialized countries, while over 90 % of coffee production occurs in developing countries. For example, in Brazil, the world’s largest coffee producer, over five million people are involved in the cultivation and harvesting of coffee plants. (Beelarts 2011). It is crucial to the economies and politics of many developing countries because its cultivation, processing, trading, and marketing provide employment for millions of people (Mussatto et al. 2011). Colombia was the third largest coffee producer in the world after Brazil and Vietnam until 2009 when it was overtaken by Indonesia. In 2013, Brazil produced 56.1 million 60-kg bags of green coffee, Vietnam 26.5 million, Indonesia 10.5 million, and Colombia 9.9 million (Index mundi 2014).

Role of coffee in Colombia

Coffee is Colombia’s main agricultural export (FAO 2013). Coffee cultivation and export are under the management of the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros (FNC; National Coffee Growers Federation), which is the country’s most important private enterprise. The federation sponsors farmers in the coffee-growing zones through extensive social and economic aid programs. Colombian coffee is the name given to a 100 % washed Arabica coffee produced in the coffee-growing regions of Colombia (FNC-1 2010). It originates from the particular combination of diverse factors: the latitude and altitude of Colombia’s coffee growing zone, its soils, the botanical origin of the species, and the varieties of coffees produced, the climate and rain pattern generated by the double path of the Intertropical Convergence Zone over the coffee area, the ever changing topography, the luminosity, the favorable temperature range within the day and throughout the year, an adequate amount and distribution of the rain, and some common cultural practices that include the processes of selective harvesting and of transformation of the fruit through its washing and drying (FNC-1 2010). Furthermore, the tradition of the selective harvesting of Colombian coffee, the variety, the wet processing, the drying process and its subsequent classification and threshing are also the basis for the optimum quality of the product (Alvarado et al. 2002; FNC-1 2010). The production of green (unroasted) coffee beans by year in Colombia over the past decade is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Green coffee production in Colombia from 2004 to 2013 (reference: Index mundi 2014)

Market year

Production (million 60-kg bags)

Growth rate (%)































Environmental impact of coffee production

No matter where coffee is grown, discharge from coffee processing plants represents a major source of river pollution in Central and South America. The process of separating the commercial product (the bean) from coffee cherries generates enormous volumes of waste material in the form of pulp, residual water, and parchment. For example, the Guatemala-based Instituto Centroamericano de Investigación y Tecnología Industrial estimated that over a 6-month period during 1988, the processing of 547,000 tons of coffee in Central America generated 1.1 million tons of pulp and polluted 110,000 m3 of water per day, resulting in discharge into the region’s waterways equivalent to raw sewage from a city of 4 million people (NRDC 2014). It has been calculated that processing of every one million 60-kg bags of dried coffee beans produces 218,400 tons of fresh pulp and mucilage, which has a chemical oxygen demand equivalent to that of the sewage generated in 1 year by 1.2 million people (Veenstra 1995). The FNC’s National Coffee Research Center (Cenicafé) in Colombia has conducted research on coffee production, harvesting methods, wet mill processes, quality, by-products management, and natural resource conservation. The protection, recovery, and appropriate management of soils and water sources are a priority in Colombia, and Cenicafé has been recognized for their efforts in promoting water conservation, prevention and control of water pollution, and sustainable practices for the use of water sources (Cenicafé 2011).

Colombian coffee production

Coffee cultivation in Colombia

The Arabica coffee produced in Colombia needs specific climatic conditions for its production. The ideal conditions for the cultivation of this species are found between 1,200 m (4,000 ft) and 1,800 m (6,000 ft) above sea level, with temperatures between 17 and 23 °C (62 and 75 °F), and with precipitation close to 2,000 mm (78 in.) per year, evenly distributed throughout the year. The specific geographic location of each Colombian coffee growing region determines its particular conditions of water availability, temperature, solar radiation, and wind regime for coffee cultivation (FNC-2 2010). Most Colombian coffee growing areas are located in the Colombian Departments of Antioquia, Boyacá, Caldas, Cauca, Cesar, Caquetá, Casanare, Cundinamarca, Guajira, Huila, Magdalena, Meta, Nariño, Norte de Santander, Quindío, Risaralda, Santander, Tolima, and Valle. In most of the coffee-growing regions in the country, there is a period of flowering from January to March, and another one from July to September. The main harvest in these zones takes place between September and December, and there is a secondary harvest during the second quarter of the year (FNC-2 2010).

The mature coffee bean is either red or yellow in color. Each bean has an exterior skin (exocarp) that wraps around a sweet pulp-like substance (mesocarp). Under the pulp are beans covered by a delicate and translucent membrane (silver skin) and these layers sheath the two internal coffee seeds (endosperm). These seeds are roasted in order to produce the beverage that consumers recognize as “coffee.” The post-harvest processes, commonly referred to as the “beneficio” serve to transform the coffee cherry into a dry product ready to be roasted.

The wet beneficio process includes de-pulping, fermentation, washing, and drying the coffee bean. In the first step, the coffee bean is de-pulped immediately after being harvested. Subsequently, the mucilage is removed mechanically or by means of hydraulic fermentation. Because the time needed to ferment the coffee beans is a critical factor in the quality of the coffee, samples are taken periodically from the fermentation tanks to determine the optimal point to initiate the final washing process. After the fermentation process is completed, the beans are washed to eliminate the mucilage from the bean. The wet beneficio process is linked with the Colombian coffee tradition and constitutes one of the principal elements in guaranteeing the quality of coffee. Once the coffee has gone through the wet beneficio process, it is dried naturally through exposure to sunlight or in mechanical dryers. The dried coffee seeds are commonly referred to as parchment coffee. When the drying process is completed, the coffee undergoes a process referred to as hulling, which removes the parchment from the beans in order to obtain green coffee. The green coffee seeds are then selected and classified in terms of size, weight, color, and physical appearance (FNC-3 2010).

Impact of Colombian coffee processing on water quality

During the wet method of processing coffee, enormous amounts of biowaste are generated in the form of pulp and residual water. This wastewater is high in organic matter and acidity content with a chemical oxygen demand (COD; a rapid measure of the total quantity of oxygen required to oxidize all organic material into carbon dioxide and water) value that varies between 18,000 and 30,000 mg per liter. The organic matter in agricultural waste runoff is decomposed by water-borne bacteria using dissolved oxygen. In cases of substantial discharge of wastewater into natural water bodies, the oxygen is significantly depleted, thereby destroying aquatic plants and animals (UTZ Certified 2013).

In 2004, the government of Colombia contracted with Resources for the Future (RFF), a nonprofit research organization, to study the effectiveness and efficiency of Colombia’s environmental policies (Blackman et al. 2006). The final report assesses those policies from 1993 to 2003 that address environmental planning and management, as well as those that utilize command-and-control regulations, market-based instruments, legal mechanisms, administrative procedures, and mediation. It identified areas of concern in the environmental management system. In examining water quality, it reported that according to the Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM), the collection and management of information on ambient water quality in Colombia were not adequate. Monitoring stations exist, but coverage was limited and data collection and management were not standardized. According to the RFF report, although reliable analysis of water pollution at the national level was not available, Colombia’s National Planning Department (DNP) estimated that in 1994, the three largest contributors to biochemical oxygen demand (the principal measure of organic pollutant discharges) in surface waters in Colombia were: (1) agricultural and livestock nonpoint sources (84 %); (2) domestic wastewater from large urban centers (10 %); and (3) industrial point sources (6 %). Typically, in most countries with significant agricultural sectors, nonpoint sources, which are particularly difficult to control, are the leading cause of water pollution. There is a general consensus that many of Colombia’s water basins are severely polluted, with the Bogotá, Cali, Cauca, Medellín, de Oro, Lebrija, Pasto, Pamplonita, Combeima, and Otún rivers are in critical condition (Blackman et al. 2006).

Although Colombia has abundant fresh water resources, water scarcity has become a problem in some regions. If management of watersheds is not improved, it is estimated that vulnerability to surface water shortages will grow and give rise to significant problems in the Andes and Caribbean regions. The use of pesticides and agro-chemicals in the coffee cultivation process has led to the contamination of water sources with nitrates, sulfates, and phosphates. Deforestation of the watersheds of the middle and upper basins of the Cauca and Magdalena Rivers has destabilized water sources balance and increased erosion in Colombia’s coffee region (Slunge 2008).

Progress toward sustainable coffee production in Colombia

Water pollution reduction in Colombia

Recent years have witnessed important progress in the development of pollution control technologies in coffee processing. Coffee pulping stations using the Ecomill technology (Colombian Coffee Growers 2013; Oliveros-Tascón et al. 2011) are substantially reducing the volume of water used in the wet processing of coffee; this, in turn, reduces the amount of water requiring treatment before being discharged from the processing facilities. Additional environmentally sound measures have been implemented, including composting coffee husks mixed with farm animal manure to use as organic fertilizer on crops and building anaerobic digesters that produce methane gas that can be used for powering the processing plant (NRDC 2014).

Environmental protection and sustainability are vital to the success of the coffee growing and production industry. As a result, in Colombia, much of the work of the FNC and Cenicafé is dedicated to understanding the relationship between coffee growing and the environment and finding techniques to minimize the environmental impact at each stage of coffee production (Colombian Coffee Growers 2013). In order to avoid the contamination of water resources with nitrates, sulfates, and phosphates, the research performed by Cenicafé has led to the reduced use of pesticides and agro-chemicals in the coffee cultivation process. The reduction was possible due to the renewal of coffee crops with Arabica varieties resistant to coffee rust, the implementation of integrated management of coffee pests and diseases, and the maintenance of the soil’s productive capacity and natural fertility. Another area of research is the stabilization of water sources balance and reduction of erosion in Colombia’s coffee region. The reforestation of the watersheds of the middle and upper basins of the Cauca and Magdalena Rivers, and the increase of sustainable forest practices and ecosystem protection are some of Cenicafé’s major initiatives. Furthermore, Cenicafé’s developments for decreasing water usage in the different stages of the wet processing of coffee have managed to substantially reduce water consumption (Colombian Coffee Growers 2013).

The most important technology developed by Cenicafé and currently available to Colombian coffee growers is the new Ecomill coffee washing technology, which significantly reduces water and energy consumption and completely eliminates wastewater contamination during the de-pulping or processing stages. It allows coffee to be washed by a process of natural fermentation (or by applying pectinolytic enzymes) using between 0.35 and 0.6 l of water per kilogram (L/kg) of dried parchment coffee (cps) produced. This level of water consumption is extremely low compared to washing in vats with manual agitation, which requires 4.2 L/kg cps, or washing in larger-sized tanks with waterproof pumps (requires between 6 and 9 L/kg cps) or using washing channels (requires 20 L/kg cps) (Oliveros-Tascón et al. 2011). The previous Becolsub technology, which was also developed by Cenicafé, had already reduced water consumption to between 0.7 and 1.0 L/kg cps. The Ecomill technology can be used to produce mild coffee not only with a significant reduction in water usage but also most notably with a 100 % reduction of the contamination generated by wastewater during the washing process. The environmental advances made by deploying Ecomill in comparison to earlier technologies are especially important in times when global environmental awareness is on the rise, as is the demand for sustainable agricultural products, including coffee (Colombian Coffee Growers 2013).

Ongoing sustainability efforts in Colombia

Eco-certification of food and other agricultural products has been promoted as a way of making markets work for sustainability. Certification programs offer a price premium to producers who invest in more sustainable practices. Several certification programs exist today for global commodities such as timber, coffee, cocoa, and bananas with different claims to sustainability (Dauvergne and Lister 2012; Giovannucci and Ponte 2005). Four certification programs include the coffee sector: Rainforest Alliance, UTZ, Organic, and Fair Trade. The literature on the impacts of certification has focused primarily on the economic benefits farmers perceive from participating in these programs. The economic benefits, however, are often subject to price variability, offering only a partial explanation of why farmers join and stay in certification programs (Hughell and Newsom 2013).

Rueda and Lambin (2013) evaluated the potential of the Rainforest Alliance certification program to foster more resilient social–ecological systems in the face of globalization. Using the case of Santander, Colombia, and a pair-based comparison of 86 households, Rueda and Lambin showed that certification provides important environmental benefits, while improving the well-being of farmers and their communities. Furthermore, their study showed that price premiums are only one of many elements defining the success of certification, particularly important for motivating farmers to join, but less so to explain retention and upgrading. In fact, non-premium benefits explain retention in the certification program. Through certification, farmers acquired skills and abilities that helped them mobilize assets and make their operation more sustainable, even in the face of decreasing premiums. They also gained access to information, technology, social networks, and resources that were not able to reach them before they became certified. Coffee growers widened their access to market outlets whose prices are more stable and have done so while enhancing local agro-ecosystems. Small farmers, supported by a strong institutional arrangement that provides technical and commercial services, have not only coped with market trends but also adapted to changing conditions in the global economy to achieve more sustainable livelihoods and land use practices (Blackman et al. 2006; Rueda and Lambin 2013).

Utilization of biomass waste materials in Colombia

Colombia is a major producer of agricultural and animal commodities (index mundi 2014), and these operations generate large amounts of residues and wastes. The agricultural residues and animal waste can be used to produce energy and other products in systems similar to an ethanol refinery where the production process involves conversion of biomass into fuel, energy, and chemicals, integrated in the context of a biorefinery. The main geographical regions generating biomass waste are the Magdalena Valley with palm oil, sugarcane, and other crops; the eastern slopes and the western mountain range in the vicinity of Bogota with its palm plantations; the Department of Antioquia and Valle del Cauca where coffee and sugarcane are produced; and in the regions where coffee pulping operations are located (Keesman 2011).

In addition to pulp and mucilage waste from coffee processing, Colombia has an abundance of biomass in the form of sugar cane. The rainfall patterns in the region near the Pacific Coast where the sugar is grown for the biofuels industry allows the crop to be harvested throughout the year. Sugar cane is also grown farther east, but because of constant rain from April to August, it can only be harvested 8 months out of the year. After the sugars are extracted, the remaining bagasse, which comprises a majority of the plant’s mass and gives it rigidity and structure, can be stacked and stored. Currently, bagasse is burned to produce steam that drives turbines for the generation of electricity. The Energy Department’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is working with Ecopetrol, the largest oil company in Colombia, to process the residue from sugar cane and palm oil harvesting into fuel ethanol for blending with gasoline (NREL 2013). The aim is to optimize the conversion process for bagasse and to analyze the economic case for commercial production of biofuel from these materials. It includes a study on palm rachis, the material left over after palm oil production, as an example. The hope is that commercial conversion facilities and employees can be kept in operation all year by processing the bagasse during the rainy season when it is too wet to get to the fields and harvest the sugar cane (NREL 2013).

In 2011, better weather conditions in the sugarcane area resulted in an increase in sugarcane supply for sugar and ethanol. Colombian palm oil and sugarcane production well exceeded the local demand and generated a surplus that sustained biofuels production. Ethanol production was 351 million liters, which was 25 % higher than the previous year. There are several studies in Colombia looking for financing to produce ethanol and biodiesel with feedstocks other than sugarcane and palm oil. Because Colombia’s biofuels capacity has not reached the initial biofuel blend mandated by the government, the Colombian government has allowed the amount of ethanol blended with biofuels to increase along with the increase in production as new facilities expand or enter into production (Global 2011).

Colombia is experienced in biofuel production through fermentation to produce ethanol and the transesterification process to produce biodiesel. The Ministry of Environment (MAVDT) is collaborating with the industry to further develop biomass in Colombia by involving the rural, agricultural, and energy sectors in an integrated effort of research and pilot projects to demonstrate the viability of biomass as an energy source. In addition to cellulosic ethanol, another option being considered is the gasification of biomass to obtain synthetic gas (syngas), subsequent purification of the gas, and generation of synthetic diesel and gasoline (Keesman 2011).

In Colombia, agriculture is one of the sectors most affected by climate change, and at the same time, the sector contributes the most to global warming. Climate change is causing a shift from coffee to corn (maize) production. Climate conditions, particularly changes in availability of water, affect animal and crop productivity. Colombia’s National Planning Department (DNP) is coordinating a project aimed at quantifying the economic cost of climate change impacts and determining optimal responses. Corn, rice, potatoes, and sugarcane were selected as the first crops to consider based on their economic and food security importance. The crops were matched to production regions, where information about soils, soil use, type of agricultural practices, and climate conditions was collected. The project identified climate scenarios and simulated growth and yields for each region under different climate scenarios. The results are helping farmers to identify adaptation measures in the types of crops they grow that can reduce hunger and improve nutrition (Loboguerrero and Vermeulen 2013).

Potential conversion technologies for coffee and other agricultural wastes

Coupled biochemical and thermochemical conversion technologies

Agricultural wastes from coffee operations are complex materials (Navia et al. 2011) as illustrated by an analysis of a mixture of 60 % pulp plus 40 % mucilage simulating coffee waste presented in Table 2. A combination of technologies will likely be required to convert waste produced at crop-processing operations, such as coffee pulping stations, to valuable biofuels and bioproducts. These might involve a series of microbial (biochemical) and thermochemical conversion processes as well as water treatment processes in an integrated biorefinery strategy. The initial bioconversion in the proposed biorefinery concept is fermentation of the sugars present in the waste by a thermotolerant mutant Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast strain, NRRL Y-50798 (Hughes et al. 2013). The resulting sugar-depleted solids (mostly protein) can subsequently be subjected to treatment by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NRRL YB-567 var. F to produce bio-based ammonia for fertilizer. The residual protein can then be degraded by Yarrowia lipolytica proteases to peptides and free amino acids for animal feed. The lignocellulosic fraction of the waste can be ground and treated to release sugars for fermentation by a recombinant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hughes et al. 2009b). Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-50183 has the potential to be engineered to produce valuable peptide products in this step. In the last biochemical step, the residual solids including protein and lignin can be jet cooked and passed to a fermenter where an engineered mutagenized strain of Rhodotorula glutinis NRRL Y-12906 can convert the resulting materials and methane from anaerobic digestion operations into isoprenoid intermediates. The resulting fermentation residues can be combined and transferred into pyrocracking and hydroformylation reactions to convert ammonia, protein, isoprenoid intermediates, lignins, and oils into renewable gasoline. Any remaining waste can be thermoconverted to biochar as a humus soil enhancer. The multi-stage biorefinery would utilize coffee pulping waste during the harvest seasons and would operate between coffee harvests using other agricultural waste readily available in Colombia, such as palm rachis or sugarcane bagasse, close to the pulping operations.
Table 2

Composition of a mixture of 60 % pulp plus 40 % mucilage simulating coffee waste (reference: Hughes, unpublished data)


Sucrose (mg/g)

Glucose (mg/g)

Galactose (mg/g)

Fructose (mg/g)

Xylose (mg/g)

Arabinose (mg/g)

Uronic acid (mg/g)

Fructan (mg/g)

AIR (g/kg)

Ash (g/kg)

Soluble sugars


4.53 ± 0.70

104.2 ± 4.77

0.46 ± 0.10

87.31 ± 4.57



168.2 ± 4.97

173.7 ± 2.66

0.68 ± 0.59

167.9 ± 1.31


Storage carbohydrates (starch)



5.70 ± 0.33


5.38 ± 0.32 (xyl + gal)




6.24 ± 0.22


5.64 ± 0.35 (xyl + gal)


Cell wall carbohydrates



110.1 ± 4.10


33.49 ± 2.25


30.95 ± 0.49

46.12 ± 1.48




33.23 ± 1.13


9.38 ± 0.48


8.64 ± 0.66

15.79 ± 0.49


Uronic acid and fructan



17.41 ± 1.72

13.29 ± 5.06




27.14 ± 0.14

35.17 ± 4.65


Acid insoluble residue (AIR) and ash



130.6 ± 2.88

4.25 ± 0.97



42.96 ± 23.24

3.58 ± 0.64

*Average and standard deviation of two replicates; all other values are average and standard deviation of three replicates

Biochemical conversion technologies

Kluyveromyces fermentation in first tank (F1)

The yeast K. marxianus has advantages that make it a promising candidate for use as a versatile, thermotolerant, industrial biocatalyst (Fonseca et al. 2008). It has been reported to grow at 47 °C and above (Nonklang et al. 2008) and has the ability to produce ethanol at temperatures above 40 °C (Abdel-Banat et al. 2010; Fonseca et al. 2008; Yanase et al. 2010). In addition, K. marxianus offers other benefits including a high growth rate and the ability to utilize a wide variety of carbohydrate substrates such as xylose, xylitol, cellobiose, lactose, arabinose, and glycerol (Nonklang et al. 2008; Rodrussamee et al. 2011). K. marxianus also grows on sucrose, raffinose, and inulin at 45 °C under a static condition even when glucose is present unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Lertwattanasakul et al. 2011). Because of these advantages, K. marxianus is currently being developed as a viable alternative to Saccharomyces cerevisiae for ethanol production (Rodrussamee et al. 2011).

To improve K. marxianus growth and ethanol yield at elevated temperatures under microaerophilic conditions, Hughes et al. (2013) irradiated K. marxianus NRRL Y-1109 with UV-C. Two K. marxianus mutant strains survived and were isolated from the glucose plates. Both mutant strains, but not wild type, grew aerobically on glucose at 47 °C. All strains grew anaerobically at 46 °C on glucose, galactose, galacturonic acid, and pectin; however, only one strain (NRRL Y-50798) grew anaerobically on xylose at 46 °C. With glucose or galacturonic acid as carbon source, ethanol yield was higher for this strain than for wild type.

Kluyveromyces marxianus NRRL Y-50798 was tested for growth on inulin, present in garlic, onion, agave (used in tequila production), pataca, ñame, artichoke, and other products. Inulin belongs to a class of dietary fibers known as fructans and contains a high proportion of fructose monomers. K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 is able to provide inulinase enzyme to convert the polymer into usable fructose (Galindo-Leva, unpublished data). Inulin utilization and growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 in yeast–peptone–inulin (YPI; 2 %) medium, and pectin utilization and growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 in coffee waste (60 % pulp plus 40 % mucilage) at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 160 h are shown in Fig. 1. The mutant strain was also tested for ethanol production from coffee waste (60 % pulp, 40 % mucilage, 12.5 % solids). The results obtained at 35 °C for sugar consumption (sucrose, glucose, fructose were measured), ethanol production and cell growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 using coffee waste in a 30-L fermenter for 70 h are presented in Fig. 2. The residual solid material, consisting primarily of protein, can be used directly in a fermentation stage with Yarrowia. The water associated with the Kluyveromyces fermentation can be treated using a commercial reverse osmosis desalination system to remove salts and reduce acidity.
Fig. 1

Inulin utilization and growth (live colonies/mL) of K. marxianus mutant strain NRRL Y-50798 in yeast–peptone–inulin (YPI; 2 %) medium and pectin utilization and cell growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 in coffee waste (60 % pulp plus 40 % mucilage) at 30 °C and 200 rpm over a period of 160 h. (Galindo-Leva, unpublished data)

Fig. 2

Sugar consumption, ethanol production, and cell growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-50798 on coffee waste at 35 °C in a 30-L fermentor for 70 h. Sugar and ethanol concentrations determined by HPLC. (López-Núñez, unpublished data)

Yarrowia fermentation in second tank (F2)

Yarrowia lipolytica is an oleaginous yeast species that is widely utilized in industrial applications such as production of organic acids and lipids from glucose (Papanikolaou et al. 2009). It is similar to Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ease of genetic manipulation and growth capacity. It is also able to perform post-translational processing of complex proteins, has a mainly co-translational secretion pathway, high secretion capacity and product yield, and low hyperglycosylation of products. Furthermore, production of Yarrowia lipolytica is relatively easy to scale up, thereby giving it advantages as a protein expression system (Gasmi et al. 2011). In addition, the whole genome of Yarrowia lipolytica has been sequenced (Dujon et al. 2004).

Yarrowia lipolytica has been the focus of studies in many research centers, and in recent years, it has been perceived as an especially attractive host for many biotechnological applications (Rywińska et al. 2013). Among the compounds produced by Yarrowia lipolytica are omega-3 fatty acids for use as health supplements and in the pharmaceutical, aquaculture, terrestrial animal feed, pet food, and personal care markets (Xue et al. 2013). Alpha-ketoglutaric, pyruvic, isocitric, and citric acids can be synthesized by Yarrowia lipolytica using n-alkanes, glucose, and glycerol as carbon sources (Finogenova et al. 2005; Papanikolaou and Aggelis 2009). Blazeck et al. (2014) undertook genotypic and phenotypic optimization of the native metabolism of Yarrowia lipolytica to create a strain with significantly improved lipogenesis capability. Furthermore, they demonstrated that these lipids can be readily converted into fatty acid methyl esters suitable for biodiesel. Their results support the potential of Yarrowia lipolytica as a platform for sustainable production of biodiesel and other important oleochemicals (Blazeck et al. 2014). The industrial potential of Yarrowia lipolytica is also discussed by Groenewald et al. (2014).

A recent review by Rywińska et al. (2013) provides a discussion of the characteristics of Yarrowia lipolytica and summarizes relevant scientific research concerning the conversion of crude glycerol discharged after the biodiesel (fatty acid methyl/ethyl esters) manufacturing process into value-added products with Yarrowia lipolytica. It also describes the feasibility of using Yarrowia lipolytica biomass, which is rich in proteins and oils, as food and feed additives and presents the different strategies employed to produce and improve yield of organic acids, such as citric, pyruvic, and α-ketoglutaric acid (Rywińska et al. 2013).

In order to improve the amount of ammonia and oil produced by Yarrowia lipolytica, Hughes et al. irradiated Yarrowia lipolytica NRRL YB-567 with UV-C as described previously for K. marxianus NRRL Y-1109 (Hughes et al. 2013), and subsequently screened the resulting Yarrowia mutants for increased ammonia and triglyceride production. Yarrowia lipolytica NRRL Y-567 mutant strain F showed high levels of ammonia production and protein release (Fig. 3) and oil production (Fig. 4) from coffee waste. The protein is degraded by Yarrowia lipolytica proteases to peptides and free amino acids for animal feed. One additional commercially valuable product, phenylethanol, used as a fragrance, flavor, and antimicrobial agent (Celińska et al. 2013; Etschmann et al. 2003), is produced by Yarrowia at a concentration of 0.11 g/L (Fig. 5). The fatty acid profile of the oil produced by Yarrowia is favorable for the production of high-quality renewable gasoline and biodiesel and is presented in Table 3.
Fig. 3

Ammonia (mean ± SD) production and protein release over a period of 7 days by Y. lipolytica YB-567 mutant strain F on coffee waste pretreated with K. marxianus. Ammonia concentration was determined using a Megazyme Ammonia Assay kit. Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay. (Hughes unpublished data)

Fig. 4

Oil production (percent by weight of production for wild type (wt) strain; wt = 100 %) for seven aerobic mutant Y. lipolytica strains (designated A, B2, B, C, D, E, and F) and wild type (wt) strain on coffee waste after incubation for 7 days. Concentration was determined by derivatization of oil with methanolic KOH to fatty acid methyl esters and subsequent analysis by gas chromatography. (Hughes, unpublished data)

Fig. 5

Production of 2-phenylethanol over a period of 6 days by Y. lipolytica mutant strain F on coffee waste pretreated with K. marxianus. Concentration was determined using HPLC. (Hughes, unpublished data)

Table 3

Fatty acid profile of oil produced by Y. lipolytica mutant strain F on coffee waste pretreated with K. marxianus (reference: Hughes unpublished data)

Fatty acid

Without SCG (%)

With SCG (%)

C16:0 = palmitic acid



C16:1 = palmitoleic acid



C18:0 = stearic acid



C18:1 = oleic acid



C18:2 = linoleic acid



C18:3 = linolenic acid



C20:0 = arachidic acid



C22:0 = behenic acid



C30:0 = mellisic acid






Monoacylglycerols (MAG)



Diacylglycerols (DAG)



Triacylglycerols (TAG)






SCG spent coffee grounds (borra de café) (Mussatto et al. 2011)

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation in third tank (F3)

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is currently the most widely employed microbial catalyst in the biotechnology industry, but this yeast does not naturally ferment xylose. Commercialization of fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has focused on engineering the glucose-fermenting industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to use pentose sugars. Extensive research efforts using innovative genetic engineering approaches have improved xylose utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Brat et al. 2009; Casey et al. 2013; Garcia et al. 2010; Ha et al. 2011; Hahn-Hägerdal et al. 2007; Ho et al. 1998; Hughes et al. 2009a, 2009b; Jeffries and Jin 2004; Kato et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013; Olofsson et al. 2012; Oreb et al. 2012; Scalcinati et al. 2012; Van Maris et al. 2007; Wisselink et al. 2009), but optimization is still needed.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae naturally metabolizes xylulose, therefore one approach for enabling xylose utilization involves introducing the gene encoding xylose isomerase (XI), which catalyzes the direct conversion of xylose to xylulose and which may be obtained from a microorganism naturally capable of fermenting xylose. Overexpression of endogenous xylulokinase (XKS), which catalyzes the conversion of xylulose to xylulose-5-phosphate, is also necessary to overcome the naturally low expression level of this enzyme (Karhumaa et al. 2007).

Hughes et al. (2009b)) developed a three-plasmid yeast expression system utilizing the portable small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) vector set combined with the efficient endogenous yeast protease Ulp1 to produce large amounts of soluble functional protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The system consists of three vectors each with a different selectable marker (uracil (URA3), tryptophan (TRP1), or leucine (LEU2)) to provide high expression levels of three different proteins simultaneously. A PCR assembly strategy was used to clone the Piromyces sp. E2 XI gene into the URA-selectable SUMO vector. A library of mutagenized genes encoding a cell-penetrating peptide (Lyt-1) was cloned into the TRP-selectable SUMO vector, and either the Yersinia pestis XKS or transaldolase (TAL) gene was cloned into the LEU-selectable SUMO vector. All three SUMO plasmids (XI, XKS, or TAL, and Lyt-1) or the SUMO-XI plasmid alone were transformed into the INVSc1 yeast strain. Recombinant yeast strains expressing XI and XKS with or without Lyt-1 showed improved aerobic growth rates in xylose liquid medium compared to the INVSc1-XI yeast (Hughes et al. 2009b). These results demonstrated that the SUMO three-plasmid system can be used to simultaneously express high levels of several proteins that allow xylose utilization.

In another study, Hughes et al. (manuscript submitted) used the SUMO fusion protein expression system to construct a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) containing a SUMO-XI-XKS polyprotein gene for stable transformation into Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and demonstrated the feasibility of the YAC4 as a stable protein expression system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Piromyces sp. E2 XI gene and the Yersinia pestis XKS gene were obtained by PCR amplification from the plasmids used previously (Hughes et al. 2009b) and placed into a SUMO-XI-XKS polyprotein expression cassette behind the TRP1 promoter. The SUMO system can also be used for the concomitant expression of a value-added protein co-product, such as an insecticidal peptide (Hughes et al. 2008), the enzyme Candida antarctica lipase B (Hughes et al. 2011), or the natural peptide sweetener, brazzein (Pinkelman, manuscript submitted). Cell biomass production, sugar consumption, and ethanol production by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-50183 grown on borra (spent coffee grounds; Mussatto et al. 2011) acid/enzymatic hydrolysate are presented in Fig. 6 (Hughes, unpublished data). The inset in Fig. 6 shows Western blot analysis of brazzein expressed from a yeast artificial chromosome transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae PJ69-4 (Pinkelman et al., manuscript submitted).
Fig. 6

Cell biomass production (OD), sugar consumption (g/L), ethanol production (g/L), by S. cerevisiae NRRL Y-50183 transformed with a yeast artificial chromosome expressing brazzein a high-value co-product using 50 mL of borra (spent coffee grounds) acid/enzymatic hydrolysate in 250-mL flasks at 30 °C for 25 h. (López-Núñez unpublished data) Inset SDS-PAGE (12 % acrylamide gel) and Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated brazzein expressed from this yeast artificial chromosome transformed into S. cerevisiae PJ69-4 diploid strain (Lane 1 from left, 6.5 kDa); Lane 2 untransformed control strain; Lane 3 Immunoprecipitated purified synthetic brazzein; Molecular markers: See Blue Plus2 ladder (Pinkelman et al., manuscript submitted)

Rhodotorula glutinis fermentation in fourth tank (F4)

The residual solids including protein and lignin can be jet cooked and passed to a fermenter for conversion into isoprenes by Rhodotorula glutinis. Wolf et al. (1980) reported the first isolation and characterization of eukaryotes capable of growth on methane. They examined two of the methane-utilizing yeasts, identified as strains of Sporobolomyces roseus and Rhodotorula glutinis, by electron microscopy to determine if these microorganisms showed ultrastructural modifications associated with growth on methane. Their data suggested that microbodies and the catalase contained within them play a role in eukaryotic methane metabolism (Wolf et al. 1980).

Moliné et al. (2012) demonstrated that yeasts of the genera Rhodotorula are able to synthesize different pigments of high economic value like β-carotene, torulene, and torularhodin. However, the low production rate of pigment in these microorganisms limits its industrial application. They described strategies to obtain hyperpigmented mutants of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa by means of ultraviolet-B radiation, the procedures for total carotenoids extraction and quantification, and a method for identification of each pigment. Buzzini and Martini (2000) investigated the production of carotenoids by strains of Rhodotorula glutinis on different raw materials of agro-industrial origin (grape must, glucose syrup, beet molasses, soybean flour extract, maize flour extract). The maximum yield (5.95 mg/L of total carotenoids culture fluid, 630 μg/g dry cell weight) was obtained with a particular strain of Rhodotorula glutinis after a batch culture of 120 h in a substrate containing concentrated rectified grape must as the sole carbohydrate source. In all experiments, the major pigments forming carotenoids (β-carotene, torulene, torularhodin) were quantified.

Cheirsilp et al. (2011) obtained enhanced lipid production from industrial wastes with a mixed culture of oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis and microalga Chlorella vulgaris. These wastes included effluent from seafood processing plant and molasses from a sugarcane plant. In the mixed culture, the yeast grew faster and the lipid production was higher than that in the pure cultures. This could be because microalga acted as an oxygen generator for yeast, while yeast provided carbon dioxide to microalga and both carried out the production of lipids. The highest biomass of 4.63 g/L and lipid production of 2.88 g/L were obtained after 5 days of cultivation. In addition, the plant oil-like fatty acid composition of yeast and microalgal lipids suggested their high potential for use as biodiesel feedstock (Cheirsilp et al. 2011).

The fatty acid profile of the oil from Rhodotorula glutinis (F4) grown on residual protein and lignin solids from Saccharomyces tank (F3) is given in Table 4. A diagram of the improved strains proposed for use in the multi-stage biorefinery concept and the products they potentially yield are provided in Fig. 7.
Table 4

Fatty acid profile of the oil (tank F4) from R. glutinis mutant grown on residual protein and lignin solids from tanks F3 + F4 (reference: Hughes, unpublished data)

Fatty acid

Without SCG (%)

With SCG (%)

C16:0 = palmitic acid



C16:1 = palmitoleic acid



C18:0 = stearic acid



C18:1 = oleic acid



C18:1 = Δ6



C18:2 = linoleic acid



C18:3 = linolenic acid



C18:3 = Δ9,12,15



C20:0 = arachidic acid



C20:1 w 5



C20:1 w 8



C20:1 w 11



C20:2 w 11, 14



C20:3 w 11,14,17



C20:4 = arachidonic



C22:0 = behenic acid



C22:1 = erucic acid



C22:2 w 13, 16



C24:0 = lignoceric acid












Monoacylglycerols (MAG)



Diacylglycerols (DAG)



Triacylglycerols (TAG)






SCG spent coffee grounds (borra de café) (Mussatto et al. 2011)

Fig. 7

Improved strains used in the multi-stage biorefinery concept and their potential products

Thermochemical conversion technologies


Pyrolysis is defined as the irreversible thermochemical decomposition of material at elevated temperature (300 + °C) in the absence of oxygen. The principal benefit of pyrolysis is conversion of low-energy density substrates into higher density liquid (bio-crude or bio-oil) and solid (biochar) fractions. A low density volatile (syngas) fraction is also produced. Pyrolysis has been utilized for centuries to produce charcoal for cooking stoves. More recently, pyrolysis is being considered for the production of transportation fuels and other products (Laird et al. 2009; Brown and Brown 2013). The distribution of pyrolysis products (among bio-oil, biochar, and syngas) is dependent on the type of pyrolysis, reaction conditions, and feedstock. Pyrolysis is classified into three categories: slow, fast, and gasification. Of these, fast pyrolysis maximizes bio-oil production, slow pyrolysis augments the yield of biochar, and gasification maximizes syngas production. With regard to production of liquid transportation fuels, fast pyrolysis is employed to produce bio-oil (Butler et al. 2011; Jarboe et al. 2011; Mohan et al. 2006; Venderbosch and Prins 2010; Yaman 2004). A review of recent laboratory research and commercial developments in fast pyrolysis and upgrading is provided by Butler et al. (2011). The properties and composition of bio-oil such as high moisture and heteroatom content, presence of oxygenates such as organic acids, and high non-oxidative reactivity prevent its direct use as a transportation fuel, thus upgrading such as hydroprocessing and distillation is necessary (Balat 2011; Butler et al. 2011; Channiwala and Parikh 2002; Elliot 2007; Mortensen et al. 2011; Pachauri and Reisinger 2007; Sorrell et al. 2010). A diagram of the process for pyrolysis of the residue from biochemical conversions (fermentations) for production of bio-oil (bio-crude) is shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 8

Process for pyrolysis of the residue from biochemical conversions (fermentations) for production of bio-oil (bio-crude) (Venderbosch and Prins 2010)

Another possibility for thermally upgrading fermentation residues is catalytic pyrolysis which involves either directly mixing zeolite catalyst particles with biomass and pyrolyzing the mixture or placing the catalyst in a fixed bed immediately downstream of the pyrolysis reactor (Carlson et al. 2009). Vapors from the pyrolyzing biomass are absorbed in the pores of the zeolite where cracking and rearrangement reactions produce olefins and aromatic compounds (Carlson et al. 2011). The process is attractive in that it converts oxygenated compounds into hydrocarbons without the addition of hydrogen. Interestingly, protein is also converted into hydrocarbons with nitrogen converted mainly to ammonia. However, the catalyst readily cokes, especially when the feedstock contains large quantities of lignin. Figure 9 illustrates the yield of aromatics for the catalytic pyrolysis of the residue from the sequential biochemical processing of coffee bean waste, as described in this review. The aromatic yields, on the order of 5–9 wt%, are relatively modest compared to yields from carbohydrate- and protein-rich feedstocks, which can be as high as 30 wt% (Wang and Brown 2013), probably because the coffee waste after biochemical processing consists substantially of lignin or recalcitrant polysaccharides.
Fig. 9

Production of aromatics by catalytic pyrolysis using HZSM-5 zeolite of the residue from coffee waste biochemical conversions. (Brown unpublished data)

Hydrocracking, hydroformylation, and hydrotreating of bio-oil

Due to the complex chemical composition of bio-oils (bio-crude), hydrotreatment will be necessary to eliminate chemically bound oxygen and sulfur as well as saturate carbon bonds. The principal reactions that occur during hydrotreatment include hydrodeoxygenation, hydrodesulfurization, hydroformylation, and hydrogenation. Hydrotreatment generally occurs at operating pressures between 10–120 bar and temperatures in the range of 250–450 °C over metal catalysts and in the presence of hydrogen. Factors that contribute to catalyst deactivation include poisoning by nitrogen species, metal deposition (specifically alkali metals), and carbon deposition (coking). Alkenes, phenolic compounds, and organic acids have the strongest affinity for carbon deposition on catalyst surfaces due to their propensity to participate in polymerization and polycondensation chemistry at hydrotreatment reaction conditions. Coking can be partially ameliorated by proper choice of catalyst, reaction pressure and temperature (Fonseca et al. 1996; Richardson et al. 1995).

Once the bio-oil has been hydrotreated, it may be subjected to hydrocracking to facilitate the conversion of larger hydrocarbons into smaller, gasoline-range species but the process is also prone to coking. After cracking has been performed, a final distillation will be necessary to collect fractions equivalent to the boiling ranges of conventional gasoline and diesel fuel (Jones et al. 2009). Hydrocracking combines molecular weight reduction of the crude oil with an increase of the hydrogen content to give a useful products range (gasoline, middle distillate). Hydrocracking requires bifunctional catalysts, containing catalytically active hydrogenation and cracking sites, and that are generally composed of metal sulfides supported on an acidic silica–alumina or stabilized Y zeolite. More active palladium (Pd) can be used, in place of metal sulfides in catalysts destined for second stage hydrocracking reactors, after most of the sulfur in the feed has been removed (Maitlis and Haynes 2008).

In the hydroformylation (or oxo) reaction the elements H and CHO are added to an olefin catalyzed by derivatives of dicobalt octacarbonyl. Alpha-olefins are hydroformylated to give both linear and branched chain aldehydes. The process is commercially important, especially to make C4 oxygenates (butyraldehyde and butanol) and many catalyst variations are known with considerable attention devoted to increasing their selectivity. Currently, three quarters of all industrial hydroformylation processes are based on rhodium triphosphine catalysts, especially for lower alkenes where high regioselectivity to linear aldehydes is critical (Maitlis and Haynes 2008). The process flow for production of renewable chemicals from bio-crude using hydrotreatment is outlined in Fig. 10.
Fig. 10

Process flow for production of renewable gas from advanced uniform fermentation streams using hydrodeoxygenation, hydroformylation, and hydrocracking. (Venderbosch and Prins 2010)

Reactions of industrial interest from pyrolysis and hydrotreatment are propylene to butyraldehyde, 1-hexene to heptaldehyde, 1-octene to nonaldehyde, decene to C11 aldehyde (target being detergent alcohols), benzene from pyrocrude to produce cyclohexane, ethylbenzene to make styrene, cumene to make phenol, and acetone to make methacrylates and methyl isobutyl ketone. The significant levels of aromatic hydrocarbons as well as alkanes, such as generated by pyrolysis of the residue of biochemical conversions of coffee waste, can be used to produce several chemical feedstocks in addition to renewable gasoline and diesel fuel.

Integration of conversion technologies for coffee and other agricultural wastes

The initial stage of the proposed integrated biorefinery concept consists of fermentation processes using Kluyveromyces (F1), Yarrowia (F2), Saccharomyces (F3), and Rhodotorula (F4) for conversion of coffee waste materials to bioethanol, ammonia fertilizer, amino acids for animal feed, useful biochemicals, and oils and other organic molecules for biodiesel and for pyrolysis to produce renewable gasoline. However, harvesting coffee is not a year-round operation. To prevent down time at the biorefinery, additional stages of the biorefinery operation will process other agricultural wastes as available, primarily from sugarcane, oil palm, cut flowers, bananas, rice, corn, borra (spent coffee grounds), and cocoa beans (index mundi 2014). A diagram of the multi-stage integrated pulping station/biorefinery concept is diagrammed in Fig. 11. The pulping station/biorefinery would utilize coffee pulping waste during the harvest seasons and would operate between coffee harvests using other agricultural waste readily available in Colombia, such as sugarcane waste shown in the figure, close to the pulping operations to ensure viability of the biorefinery. As an example, the products with the greatest economic potential that would be produced by feedstock likely to be utilized at a coffee pulping station were selected to show a rough mass balance of products for a given amount of agricultural waste used as feedstock. Specifically, an estimate of the quantities of high-value aromatic compounds produced from a typical quantity of borra feedstock in a multi-stage integrated biorefinery is presented in Fig. 12.
Fig. 11

Multi-stage integrated pulping station/biorefinery concept to ensure viable continuous operation. The pulping station/biorefinery would utilize coffee pulping waste during the harvest seasons and would operate between coffee harvests using other agricultural waste readily available in Colombia, such as sugarcane, oil palm, cut flowers, bananas, rice, corn, borra (spent coffee grounds), or cocoa beans, close to the pulping operations

Fig. 12

Estimate of the quantities of high-value aromatic compounds produced from a typical quantity of spent coffee grounds (borra) as feedstock in a multi-stage integrated pulping station/biorefinery. Borra is an example of a waste feedstock available year round that would supply the pulping station/biorefinery between coffee harvests


Coffee is highly important to the global economy and to the livelihood of the millions of people involved in its cultivation, processing, trading, and marketing. Coffee is Colombia’s chief agricultural export and is grown extensively throughout the country. Processing the coffee berries to produce coffee beans generates large amounts of waste materials, which have a major impact on the environment. Significant progress has been made in developing technologies to eliminate coffee waste in Colombia by converting it to useful biofuels and bioproducts. Considerable work is still required to commercialize these technologies in an integrated pulping station/biorefinery. The use of an integrated biorefinery that utilizes not only the coffee waste from the pulping stations, but also utilizes other readily available agricultural wastes that can be processed between coffee harvests, is proposed as a sustainable and profitable platform for eliminating environmental contamination from agricultural wastes in Colombia. Colombia’s environment offers a wide variety of crops distributed throughout the complex Andean coffee zone geography. The proposed design provides valuable biofuels and bioproducts and high-quality microbial biomass and oil for pyrolysis and hydroformylation. Cenicafé is currently partnering with industries and government organizations that have a stake in the economic and environmental sustainability of coffee production in Colombia to develop such platforms. The economic impact of these technologies will be substantial.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the essential international collaboration and valuable technical assistance of Ruben Contreras- Lisperguer and Joy Doran Peterson.


  1. Abdel-Banat BM, Hoshida H, Ano A, Nonklang S, Akada R (2010) High-temperature fermentation: how can processes for ethanol production at high temperatures become superior to the traditional process using mesophilic yeast? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(4):861–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agricultural Cooperative Development International and Volunteers in Overseas Cooperative Assistance (ACDI/VOCA). Resources. Fact sheet: coffee.$file/ACDIVOCA_Coffee_web.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2014
  3. Alvarado A, G, Puerta Q, GI (2002) La variedad Colombia y sus características de calidad física y en taza. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé (Colombia) No. 303:1–4Google Scholar
  4. Balat M (2011) Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energy Convers Manag 52(2):858–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beelarts C. Coffee trade: a basic lesson on the economics of the price of coffee. March 2011. Global Coffee Review. Accessed 6 Feb 2014
  6. Blackman A, Morgenstern R, Montealegre Murcia L, García de Brigard JC (2006) Review of the efficiency and effectiveness of Colombia’s environmental policies. Resources for the Future (RFF) Report. Accessed February 7, 2014
  7. Blazeck J, Hill A, Liu L, Knight R, Miller J, Pan A, Otoupal P, Alpe HS (2014) Harnessing Yarrowia lipolytica lipogenesis to create a platform for lipid and biofuel production. Nature Communications 5, Article number: 3131 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4131
  8. Brat D, Boles E, Wiedemann B (2009) Functional expression of a bacterial xylose isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2304–2311PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown TR, Brown RC (2013) A review of cellulosic biofuel commercial-scale projects in the United States. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7(3):235. doi: 10.1002/bbb.1387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler E, Devlin G, Meier D, McDonnell K (2011) A review of recent laboratory research and commercial developments in fast pyrolysis and upgrading. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:4171–4186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buzzini P, Martini A (2000) Production of carotenoids by strains of Rhodotorula glutinis cultured in raw materials of agro-industrial origin. Bioresour Technol 71(1):41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson TR, Tompsett GA, Conner WC, Huber GW (2009) Aromatic production from catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass-derived feedstocks. Top Catal 52:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson TR, Cheng Y-T, Jae J, Huber GW (2011) Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of wood sawdust. Energy Environ Sci 4:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casey E, Mosier NF, Adamec J, Stockdale Z, Ho N, Sedlak M (2013) Effect of salts on the co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:83PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Celińska E, Kubiak P, Białas W, Dziadas M, Grajek W (2013) Yarrowia lipolytica: the novel and promising 2-phenylethanol producer. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 40(3–4):389–392. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1240-3 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81(8):1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheirsilp B, Suwannarat W, Niyomdecha R (2011) Mixed culture of oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis and microalga Chlorella vulgaris for lipid production from industrial wastes and its use as biodiesel feedstock. N Biotechnol 28(4):362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.01.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colombian Coffee Growers Federation (2013) Ecomill®: a new, cleaner technology for coffee processing, now available to Colombian coffee growers. National Coffee Growers Federation (FNC) Accessed 8 Feb 2014
  19. Dauvergne P, Lister J (2012) Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob Environ Chang 22:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, De Montigny J, Marck C, Neuvéglise C, Talla E, Goffard N, Frangeul L, Aigle M, Anthouard V, Babour A, Barbe V, Barnay S, Blanchin S, Beckerich JM, Beyne E, Bleykasten C, Boisramé A, Boyer J, Cattolico L, Confanioleri F, De Daruvar A, Despons L, Fabre E, Fairhead C, Ferry-Dumazet H, Groppi A, Hantraye F, Hennequin C, Jauniaux N, Joyet P, Kachouri R, Kerrest A, Koszul R, Lemaire M, Lesur I, Ma L, Muller H, Nicaud JM, Nikolski M, Oztas S, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Pellenz S, Potier S, Richard GF, Straub ML, Suleau A, Swennen D, Tekaia F, Wésolowski-Louvel M, Westhof E, Wirth B, Zeniou-Meyer M, Zivanovic I, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Thierry A, Bouchier C, Caudron B, Scarpelli C, Gaillardin C, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Souciet JL (2004) Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430(6995):35–44, PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot DC (2007) Historical developments in hydroprocessing bio-oils. Energy Fuels 21:1792–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etschmann MM, Sell D, Schrader J (2003) Screening of yeasts for the production of the aroma compound 2-phenylethanol in a molasses-based medium. Biotechnol Lett 25(7):531–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, FNC-1 (2010) Colombian coffee. Accessed Feb 3, 2014
  24. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, FNC-2 (2010) The coffee land: our coffee regions. Accessed Feb 3, 2014
  25. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, FNC-3 (2010) About coffee: a special product (post-harvest). Accessed Feb 3, 2014
  26. Finogenova TV, Morgunov IG, Kamzolova SV, Chernyavskaya OG (2005) Organic acid production by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: a review of prospects. Appl Biochem Microbiol 41:418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fonseca A, Zeuthen P, Nagy JB (1996) Assignment of an average chemical structure to catalyst carbon deposits on the basis of quantitative 13C n.m.r. spectra. Fuel 75(12):1363–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fonseca GG, Heinzle E, Wittmann C, Gombert AK (2008) The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:339–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT (2013) Exports, commodities by country, Colombia 2011. Accessed March 6, 2014
  30. Garcia Sanchez R, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Sànchez Nogué VS, Almeida JRM, Larsson CU, Bengtsson O, Bettiga M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2010) Improved xylose and arabinose utilization by an industrial recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain using evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:13–19PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Gasmi N, Ayed A, Bel Hadj Ammar B, Zrigui R, Nicaud J-M, Kallel H (2011) Development of a cultivation process for the enhancement of human interferon alpha 2b production in the oleaginous yeast, Yarrowia lipolytica. Microbiol Cell Fact 10:90. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giovannucci D, Ponte S (2005) Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy 30:284–301. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Global Bioenergy News. Sugarcane crop increases Colombia ethanol. (2011) Accessed February 7, 2014
  34. Groenewald M, Boekhout T, Neuvéglise C, van Dijck PWM, Wyss M (2014) Yarrowia lipolytica: safety assessment of an oleaginous yeast with a great industrial potential. Crit Rev Microbiol 40(3):187–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ha S-J, Galazka JM, Kim SR, Choi J-H, Yang X, Seo J-H, Glass NL, Cate JHD, Jin Y-S (2011) Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(2):504–509PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2007) Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. App Microbiol Biotechnol 74(5):937–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ho NWY, Chen Z, Brainard AP (1998) Genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(5):1852–1859
  38. Hughell D, Newsom D (2013) Impact of rainforest alliance certification on coffee farms. Accessed February 7, 2014
  39. Hughes SR, Dowd PF, Hector RE, Panavas T, Sterner DE, Qureshi N, Bischoff KM, Bang SS, Mertens JA, Johnson ET, Li XL, Jackson JS, Caughey RJ, Riedmuller SB, Bartolett S, Liu S, Rich JO, Farrelly PJ, Butt TR, Labaer J, Cotta MA (2008) Lycotoxin-1 insecticidal peptide optimized by amino acid scanning mutagenesis and expressed as a coproduct in an ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. J Pept Sci 14(9):1039–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hughes SR, Hector RE, Rich JO, Qureshi N, Bischoff KM, Dien BS, Saha BC, Liu S, Cox EJ, Jackson JS Jr, Sterner DE, Butt TR, LaBaer J, Cott MA (2009a) Automated yeast mating protocol using open reading frames from Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome to improve yeast strains for cellulosic ethanol production. J Assoc Lab Autom 14:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hughes SR, Sterner DE, Bischoff KM, Hector RE, Dowd PF, Qureshi N, Bang S, Grynaviski N, Chakrabarty T, Johnson ET, Dien BS, Mertens JA, Caughey RJ, Liu S, Butt T, Labaer J, Cotta MA, Rich JO (2009b) Three-plasmid SUMO yeast vector system for automated high-level functional expression of value-added co-products in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered for xylose utilization. Plasmid 61(1):22–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hughes SR, Moser BR, Harmsen AJ, Bischoff KM, Jones MA, Pinkelman R, Bang SS, Tasaki K, Doll KM, Qureshi N, Saha BC, Liu S, Jackson JS, Robinson S, Cotta MC, Rich JO, Caimi P (2011) Production of Candida antarctica lipase B gene open reading frame using automated PCR gene assembly protocol on robotic workcell and expression in an ethanologenic yeast for use as resin-bound biocatalyst in biodiesel production. J Lab Autom 16(1):17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jala.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Jul 21 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes SR, Bang SS, Cox EJ, Schoepke A, Ochwat K, Pinkelman R, Nelson D, Qureshi N, Gibbons WR, Kurtzman CP, Bischoff KM, Liu S, Cote GL, Rich JO, Jones MA, Cedeño D, Doran-Peterson J, Riaño-Herrera NM, Rodríguez-Valencia N, López-Núñez JC (2013) Automated UV-C mutagenesis of Kluyveromyces marxianus NRRL Y-1109 and selection for microaerophilic growth and ethanol production at elevated temperature on biomass sugars. J Lab Autom 18(4):276–290. doi: 10.1177/2211068213480037 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jarboe LR, Wen Z, Choi DW, Brown RC (2011) Hybrid thermochemical processing: fermentation of pyrolysis-derived bio-oil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1519–1523. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3495-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jeffries TW, Jin YS (2004) Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63(5):495–509. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1450-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones SB, Valkenburg C, Walton CW, Elliott DC, Holladay JE, Stevens DJ, Kinchin C, Czernik S (2009) Production of gasoline and diesel from biomass via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking: a design case, U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-18284 Rev. 1.Google Scholar
  47. Karhumaa K, Garcia Sanchez R, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F (2007) Comparison of the xylose reductase-xylitol dehydrogenase and the xylose isomerase pathways for xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Cell Fact 6:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kato H, Suyama H, Yamada R, Hasunuma T, Kondo A (2012) Improvements in ethanol production from xylose by mating recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, Epub 10 March 2012Google Scholar
  49. Keesman B (2011) Opportunities in waste management and biomass in Colombia, Market Special, Metasus, European Sustainable SolutionsGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim SR, Skerker JM, Kang W, Lesmana A, Wei N, Arkin AP, Jin Y-S (2013) Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 8(2):e57048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057048 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Laird DA, Brown RC, Amonette JE, Lehmann J (2009) Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 3:547–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lertwattanasakul N, Rodrussamee N, Suprayogi LS, Thanonkeo P, Kosaka T, Yamada M (2011) Utilization capability of sucrose, raffinose and inulin and its less-sensitiveness to glucose repression in thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus DMKU 3–1042. AMB Express 1:20PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Loboguerrero Rodriguez AM, Vermeulen S (2013) Linking local agriculture into national policy by studying climate change economics in Colombia. Hunger Nutrition Climate Justice 2013 A new dialogue : putting people at the heart of global development. Project: the economics of climate change study for Colombia. Accessed February 7, 2014
  54. Maitlis P, Haynes A (2008) Syntheses based on carbon monoxide. In: Chiusoli GP, Maitlis PM (eds) Metal-catalysis in industrial organic processes. Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Publishing, Cambridge, pp 114–162. doi: 10.1039/9781847555328-00114 Google Scholar
  55. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20:848–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moliné M, Libkind D, van Broock M (2012) Production of torularhodin, torulene, and β-carotene by Rhodotorula yeasts. Methods Mol Biol 898:275–283. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-918-1_19 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mortensen PM, Grunwaldt JD, Jensen PA, Knudsen KG, Jensen AD (2011) A review of catalytic upgrading of bio-oil to engine fuels. Appl Catal A Gen 407:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mussatto SI, Machado EMS, Martins S, Teixeira JA (2011) Production, composition, and application of coffee and its industrial residues. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:661–672. doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0565-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. National renewable energy laboratory and Colombian oil firm unlocking agricultural waste feedstocks. (August 7, 2013) Accessed February 7, 2014
  60. National resources defense council coffee, conservation, and commerce in the western hemisphere, how individuals and institutions can promote ecologically sound farming and forest management in Northern Latin America. Accessed Feb 3, 2014
  61. Navia P, DP; Velasco M, R de J, Hoyos C, JL (2011) Production and evaluation of ethanol from coffee processing bu-products. Vitae [online] 18(3):287–294. Available from: ISSN 0121–4004
  62. Nonklang S, Abdel-Banat BMA, Cha-aim K, Moonjai N, Hoshida H, Limtong S, Yamada M, Akada R (2008) High-temperature ethanol fermentation and transformation with linear DNA in the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus DMKU3-1042. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(24):7514–7521PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Oliveros-Tascón CE; Sanz-Uribe JR; Montoya-Restrepo EC; Ramírez-Gómez CA (2011) Equipment for the ecological washing of degraded mucilage by natural fermentation. Revista de ingeniería. Universidad de los Andes. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. ISSN. 0121–4993. Enero – Junio, pp. 61–67Google Scholar
  64. Olofsson K, Sibbesen O, Andersen TH, Rønnow B (2012) Rapid xylose and glucose fermentation by engineered S. cerevisiae for commercial production of cellulosic ethanol. Advanced Biofuels in a Biorefinery Approach, Biorefinery Conference, Feb 28-March 1, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  65. Oreb M, Dietz H, Farwick A, Boles E (2012) Novel strategies to improve co-fermentation of pentoses with D-glucose by recombinant yeast strains in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Bioengineered 3(6):347–351PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Pachauri R, Reisinger A (Eds.), Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Technical report, IPCC, 2007.Google Scholar
  67. Papanikolaou S, Aggelis G (2009) Biotechnological valorization of biodiesel derived glycerol waste through production of single cell oil and citric acid by Yarrowia lipolytica. Lipid Technol 21:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Papanikolaou S, Chatzifragkou A, Fakas S, Galiotou-Panayotou M, Komaitis M, Nicaud JM, Aggelis G (2009) Biosynthesis of lipids and organic acids by Yarrowia lipolytica strains cultivated on glucose. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 111(12):1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Richardson SM, Nagaishi H, Gray MR (1995) Proc 210th Natl Meet Am Chem Soc 40:455–459Google Scholar
  70. Rodrussamee N, Lertwattanasakul N, Hirata K, Suprayogi LS, Kosaka T, Yamada M (2011) Growth and ethanol fermentation ability on hexose and pentose sugars and glucose effect under various conditions in thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1573–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rueda X, Lambin EF (2013) Responding to globilization: impacts of certification on Colombian small-scale coffee growers. Ecol Soc 18(3):21. doi: 10.5751/ES-05595-180321, Accessed February 7, 2014Google Scholar
  72. Rywińska A, Juszczyk P, Wojtatowicz M, Robak M, Zbigniew L, Tomaszewska L, Rymowicz W (2013) Glycerol as a promising substrate for Yarrowia lipolytica biotechnological applications. Biomass Bioenergy 48:148–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scalcinati G, Otero JM, Van-Vleet JR, Jeffries TW, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2012) Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient aerobic xylose consumption. FEMS Yeast Res 12(5):582–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00808.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Slunge D (May 30, 2008) Conflict, environment and climate change in Colombia. Environmental Economics Unit (EEU), Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg-Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) Policy BriefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sorrell S, Speirs J, Bentley R, Brandt A, Miller R (2010) Global oil depletion: a review of the evidence. Energy Policy 38(9):5290–5295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. UTZ Certified, Field Development (2013) Energy from coffee waste in Central America. Accessed 9 Feb 2014
  77. Van Maris AJA, Winkler AA, Kuyper M, deLaat WTAM, vanDijken JP, Pronk JT (2007) Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: xylose isomerase as a key component. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:179–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Veenstra S (1995) Recovery of biogas from landfill sites. IHE Delft. In: Curso taller Internacional sobre tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales. Santiago de Cali (Colombia). MemoriasGoogle Scholar
  79. Venderbosch RH, Prins W (2010) Fast pyrolysis technology development. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4:178–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang K, Brown RC (2013) Catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae for production of aromatics and ammonia. Green Chem 15:675–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA (2009) Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(4):907–914PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolf HJ, Christiansen M, Hanson RS (1980) Ultrastructure of methanotrophic yeasts. Bacteriol 141(3):1340–1349Google Scholar
  83. Xue Z, Sharpe PL, Hong SP, Yadav NS, Xie D, Short DR, Damude HG, Rupert RA, Seip JE, Wang J, Pollak DW, Bostick MW, Bosak MD, Macool DJ, Hollerbach DH, Zhang H, Arcilla DM, Bledsoe SA, Croker K, McCord EF, Tyreus BD, Jackson EN, Zhu Q (2013) Production of omega-3 eicosapentaenoic acid by metabolic engineering. Nat Biotechnol 31(8):734–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yaman S (2004) Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Convers Manag 45:651–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yanase S, Hasunuma T, Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2010) Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials at high temperature using the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus displaying cellulolytic enzymes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88(1):381–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Hughes
    • 1
  • Juan Carlos López-Núñez
    • 2
  • Marjorie A. Jones
    • 3
  • Bryan R. Moser
    • 4
  • Elby J. Cox
    • 1
  • Mitch Lindquist
    • 1
  • Luz Ángela Galindo-Leva
    • 3
  • Néstor M. Riaño-Herrera
    • 2
  • Nelson Rodriguez-Valencia
    • 2
  • Fernando Gast
    • 2
  • David L. Cedeño
    • 3
  • Ken Tasaki
    • 5
  • Robert C. Brown
    • 6
  • Al Darzins
    • 7
  • Lane Brunner
    • 8
  1. 1.Agricultural Research Service (ARS), National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research (NCAUR), Renewable Product Technology (RPT) Research UnitUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)PeoriaUSA
  2. 2.National Coffee Research Centre (Cenicafe)National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia (FNC)ManizalesColombia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  4. 4.Agricultural Research Service (ARS), National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research (NCAUR), Bio-Oils Research (BOR) UnitUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)PeoriaUSA
  5. 5.USMC Research and InnovationMitsubishi ChemicalRedondo BeachUSA
  6. 6.1140 E Biorenewables Research LaboratoryIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  7. 7.Gas Technology InstituteDes PlainesUSA
  8. 8.Gen2 EnergyFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations