Conversion of chemical scrubbers to biotrickling filters for VOCs and H2S treatment at low contact times
- 573 Downloads
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the technical and economical feasibility of converting three chemical scrubbers in series to biotrickling filters (BTFs) for the simultaneous removal of H2S and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The conversion of the full-scale scrubbers was based on previous conversion protocols. Conversion mainly required replacing the original carrier material and recycle pumps as well as modifying the controls and operation of the reactors. Complete removal of H2S and VOCs on a routine basis was reached at neutral pH in a longer period of time compared to previous conversions reported. Biotrickling filters operated at a gas contact time of about 1.4 s per reactor and at pH controlled between 6.5 and 6.8. Inlet average concentrations below 10 ppmv of H2S and below 5 ppmv for VOCs were often completely removed. The first and second bioreactors played a primary role in H2S removal. Year-round operation of the biotrickling filters proved the ability of the system to handle progressive load increases of H2S and VOCs. However, fast, sudden load changes often lead to reduced removal efficiencies. Odor analyses showed average removal efficiencies above 80 %. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of selected samples showed that outlet odor concentration was due to limited removal of VOCs. The conversion showed was economically viable taking into account the theoretical consumption of chemicals needed for the absorption and oxidation of both H2S and VOCs.
KeywordsChemical scrubbers’ conversion Biotrickling filterm H2S VOCs Neutral pH operation
We acknowledge the Centre for Industrial Technological Development (CDTI) and Ecología Técnica S.A. for providing financial support through the project BIOFILTROS—IDI 20100391. The authors would like to thank the personnel at Cubelles-Cunit WWTP for their help and support during the field work.
- Card T (2001) Chemical odour scrubbing systems. In: Stuetz R, Frechen FB (eds) Odours in Wastewater Treatment: Measuring, Modelling and Control. International Water Association Publishing, London, pp 309–344Google Scholar
- Devinny JS, Deshusses MA, Webster TS (1999) Biofiltration for air pollution control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Dorado AD, Gabriel D, Gamisans X (2013) Biofiltration of WWTP sludge composting emissions at contact times of 2 to 8 seconds. In: 5th IWA Specialized Conference on Odors and Air Emissions Jointly Held With 10th Conference on Biofiltration for Air Pollution Control, San Francisco, California, USAGoogle Scholar
- EN 13725 (2003) Air quality—determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, pp 1–70Google Scholar
- Gostelow P, Parsons SA (2000) Sewage treatment works odour measurement. Water Sci Technol 41(6):33–40Google Scholar
- Jacobson LD, Akdeniz N, Hetchler BP, Bereznicki SD, Heber AJ, Jacko RB, Heathcote KY, Hoff SJ, Koziel JA, Cai L, Zhang S, Parker DB, Caraway EA (2010) Odor and odorous chemical emissions from animal buildings: part 4. Correlations between sensory and chemical measurements. In: International Symposium on Air Quality and Manure Management for Agriculture Conference Proceedings, 13-16 September 2010, Dallas, Texas. doi:10.13031/2013.32647Google Scholar
- Nagata Y (2003) Measurement of odor threshold by triangle odor bag method. In; Ministry of Environmental Government of Japan. Odor Measurement Review. pp 122-123Google Scholar
- Scaglia B, Orzi V, Artola A, Font X, Davoli E, Sanchez A, Adani F (2011) Odours and volatile organic compounds emitted from municipal solid waste at different stage of decomposition and relationship with biological stability. Bioresour Technol 102:4638–4645. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Parcsi G, Sivret E, Stuetz R, Cesca J (2010) Olfactory characterisation of NMVOC emissions from WWTP inlet works. Water 37:82–86Google Scholar