Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 98, Issue 16, pp 7089–7096 | Cite as

The plant beneficial effects of Metarhizium species correlate with their association with roots

  • Xinggang Liao
  • Tammatha R. O’Brien
  • Weiguo Fang
  • Raymond J. St. Leger
Applied genetics and molecular biotechnology

Abstract

Metarhizium species have recently been found to be plant rhizosphere associates as well as insect pathogens. Because of their abundance, rhizospheric Metarhizium could have enormous environmental impact, with co-evolutionary implications. Here, we tested the hypothesis that some Metarhizium spp. are multifactorial plant growth promoters. In two consecutive years, corn seeds were treated with entomopathogenic Metarhizium spp. and field tested at the Beltsville Facility in Maryland. Seed treatments included application of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged strains of Metarhizium brunneum, Metarhizium anisopliae, Metarhizium robertsii, and M. robertsii gene disruption mutants that were either avirulent (Δmcl1), unable to adhere to plant roots (Δmad2), or poorly utilized root exudates (Δmrt). Relative to seeds treated with heat-killed conidia, M. brunneum, M. anisopliae, and M. robertsii significantly increased leaf collar formation (by 15, 14, and 13 %), stalk length (by 16, 10, and 10 %), average ear biomass (by 61, 56, and 36 %), and average stalk and foliage biomass (by 46, 36, and 33 %). Their major impact on corn yield was during early vegetative growth by allowing the plants to establish earlier and thereby potentially outpacing ambient biotic and abiotic stressors. Δmcl1 colonized roots and promoted plant growth to a similar extent as the parent wild type, showing that Metarhizium populations are plant growth promoters irrespective of their role as insect pathogens. In contrast, rhizospheric populations and growth promotion by Δmrt were significantly reduced, and Δmad2 failed to colonize roots or impact plant growth, suggesting that colonization of the root is a prerequisite for most, if not all, of the beneficial effects of Metarhizium.

Keywords

Plant-microbe interaction Corn yield Plant biofertilizer Rhizospheric insect pathogen Metarhizium species 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant Program competitive grant no. 2011-33522-30742 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We thank Prof. Galen P. Dively, Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, for his comprehensive technical assistance in planting and maintaining the field site. Many undergraduate students from the University of Maryland participated in collecting and analyzing samples, and we are particularly grateful to Bernard L. Stopak, Peter Nguyen, Tae Kim, and Vikas Mishra.

Supplementary material

253_2014_5788_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (676 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 676 kb)

References

  1. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM (2006) The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57(1):233–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bidochka MJ, Hajek AE (1998) A nonpermissive entomophthoralean fungal infection increases activation of insect prophenoloxidase. J Invertebr Pathol 72(3):231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bidochka MJ, Clark DC, Lewis MW, Keyhani NO (2010) Could insect phagocytic avoidance by entomogenous fungi have evolved via selection against soil amoeboid predators? Microbiology 156(7):2164–2171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bischoff JF, Rehner SA, Humber RA (2009) A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycologia 101(4):512–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridge P, Spooner B (2001) Soil fungi: diversity and detection. Plant Soil 232(1–2):147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruck D (2010) Fungal entomopathogens in the rhizosphere. BioControl 55(1):103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruck DJ, Donahue KM (2007) Persistence of Metarhizium anisopliae incorporated into soilless potting media for control of the black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus in container-grown ornamentals. J Invertebr Pathol 95(2):146–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang W, St. Leger RJ (2010) Mrt, a gene unique to fungi, encodes an oligosaccharide transporter and facilitates rhizosphere competency in Metarhizium robertsii. Plant Physiol 154(3):1549–1557PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang W, Pei Y, Bidochka MJ (2006) Transformation of Metarhizium anisopliae mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Can J Microbiol 52(7):623–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher JJ, Rehner SA, Bruck DJ (2011) Diversity of rhizosphere associated entomopathogenic fungi of perennial herbs, shrubs and coniferous trees. J Invertebr Pathol 106(2):289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harman G, Shoresh M (2007) The mechanisms and applications of symbiotic opportunistic plant symbionts. In: Vurro M, Gressel J (eds) Novel biotechnologies for biocontrol agent enhancement and management. NATO Security through Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 131–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu G, St. Leger RJ (2002) Field studies using a recombinant mycoinsecticide (Metarhizium anisopliae) reveal that it is rhizosphere competent. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(12):6383–6387PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabaluk JT, Ericsson JD (2007) Seed treatment increases yield of field corn when applied for wireworm control. Agron J 99(5):1377–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang S-C, Bark Y-G, Lee D-G, Kim Y-H (1996) Antifungal activities of Metarhizium anisopliae against Fusarium oxysporum, Botrytis cinerea, and Alternaria solani. Korean J Mycol 24(1):49–55Google Scholar
  15. Liao X-G, Fang W-G, Zhang Y-J, Fan Y-H, Wu X-W, Zhou Q, Pei Y (2008) Characterization of a highly active promoter, PBbgpd, in Beauveria bassiana. Curr Microbiol 57(2):121–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liao X, Fang W, Lin L, Lu H-L, St. Leger RJ (2013) Metarhizium robertsii produces an extracellular invertase (MrINV) that plays a pivotal role in rhizospheric interactions and root colonization. PLoS ONE 8(10):e78118PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao X, Lu H-L, Fang W, St. Leger RJ (2014) Overexpression of a Metarhizium robertsii HSP25 gene increases thermotolerance and survival in soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(2):777–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lomer CJ, Bateman RP, Johnson DL, Langewald J, Thomas M (2001) Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annu Rev Entomol 46(1):667–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maniania NK, Sithanantham S, Ekesi S, Ampong-Nyarko K, Baumgärtner J, Löhr B, Matoka CM (2003) A field trial of the entomogenous fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for control of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci. Crop Prot 22(3):553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marx J (2004) The roots of plant-microbe collaborations. Science 304(5668):234–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastouri F, Björkman T, Harman GE (2010) Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology 100(11):1213–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mourtzinis S, Arriaga FJ, Balkcom KS, Ortiz BV (2013) Corn grain and stover yield prediction at R1 growth stage. Agron J 105(4):1045–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mukherjee PK, Horwitz BA, Herrera-Estrella A, Schmoll M, Kenerley CM (2013) Trichoderma research in the genome era. Annu Rev Phytopathol 51(1):105–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Brien T (2009) The saprophytic life of Metarhizium anisopliae. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  25. Ownley B, Gwinn K, Vega F (2010) Endophytic fungal entomopathogens with activity against plant pathogens: ecology and evolution. BioControl 55(1):113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh BK, Millard P, Whiteley AS, Murrell JC (2004) Unravelling rhizosphere-microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations. Trends Microbiol 12(8):386–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. St. Leger RJ (2008) Studies on adaptations of Metarhizium anisopliae to life in the soil. J Invertebr Pathol 98(3):271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vega FE, Goettel MS, Blackwell M, Chandler D, Jackson MA, Keller S, Koike M, Maniania NK, Monzón A, Ownley BH, Pell JK, Rangel DEN, Roy HE (2009) Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol 2(4):149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Villani MG, Krueger SR, Schroeder PC, Consolie F, Console NH, Preston-Wisey LM, Roberts DW (1994) Soil application effects of Metarhizium anisopliae on Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) behavior and survival in turfgrass microcosms. Environ Entomol 23:502–513Google Scholar
  30. Viterbo A, Harel M, Horwitz BA, Chet I, Mukherjee PK (2005) Trichoderma mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling is involved in induction of plant systemic resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):6241–6246PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang C, St. Leger RJ (2006) A collagenous protective coat enables Metarhizium anisopliae to evade insect immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(17):6647–6652PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang C, St. Leger RJ (2007) The MAD1 adhesin of Metarhizium anisopliae links adhesion with blastospore production and virulence to insects, and the MAD2 adhesin enables attachment to plants. Eukaryot Cell 6(5):808–816PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang C, Duan Z, St. Leger RJ (2008) MOS1 osmosensor of Metarhizium anisopliae is required for adaptation to insect host hemolymph. Eukaryot Cell 7(2):302–309PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang S, O’Brien TR, Pava-Ripoll M, St. Leger RJ (2011) Local adaptation of an introduced transgenic insect fungal pathogen due to new beneficial mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(51):20449–20454PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weert S, Bloemberg G (2006) Rhizosphere competence and the role of root colonization in biocontrol. In: Gnanamanickam S (ed) Plant-associated bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wyrebek M, Bidochka MJ (2013) Variability in the insect and plant adhesins, Mad1 and Mad2, within the fungal genus Metarhizium suggest plant adaptation as an evolutionary force. PLoS ONE 8(3):e59357PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wyrebek M, Huber C, Sasan RK, Bidochka MJ (2011) Three sympatrically occurring species of Metarhizium show plant rhizosphere specificity. Microbiology 157(10):2904–2911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinggang Liao
    • 1
  • Tammatha R. O’Brien
    • 1
  • Weiguo Fang
    • 2
  • Raymond J. St. Leger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Microbiology, College of Life SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations