Comparison of power output by rice (Oryza sativa) and an associated weed (Echinochloa glabrescens) in vascular plant bio-photovoltaic (VP-BPV) systems
Vascular plant bio-photovoltaics (VP-BPV) is a recently developed technology that uses higher plants to harvest solar energy and the metabolic activity of heterotrophic microorganisms in the plant rhizosphere to generate electrical power. In the present study, electrical output and maximum power output variations were investigated in a novel VP-BPV configuration using the crop plant rice (Oryza sativa L.) or an associated weed, Echinochloa glabrescens (Munro ex Hook. f.). In order to compare directly the physiological performances of these two species in VP-BPV systems, plants were grown in the same soil and glasshouse conditions, while the bio-electrochemical systems were operated in the absence of additional energy inputs (e.g. bias potential, injection of organic substrate and/or bacterial pre-inoculum). Diurnal oscillations were clearly observed in the electrical outputs of VP-BPV systems containing the two species over an 8-day growth period. During this 8-day period, O. sativa generated charge ∼6 times faster than E. glabrescens. This greater electrogenic activity generated a total charge accumulation of 6.75 ± 0.87 Coulombs for O. sativa compared to 1.12 ± 0.16 for E. glabrescens. The average power output observed over a period of about 30 days for O. sativa was significantly higher (0.980 ± 0.059 GJ ha−1 year−1) than for E. glabrescens (0.088 ± 0.008 GJ ha−1 year−1). This work indicates that electrical power can be generated in both VP-BPV systems (O. sativa and E. glabrescens) when bacterial populations are self-forming. Possible reasons for the differences in power outputs between the two plant species are discussed.
KeywordsMicrobial fuel cell Photosynthesis Bioelectricity Electrochemistry Vascular plant
The authors are grateful for funding provided by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust, Commonwealth Scholarship Commission and Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Trust.
- Bain RL (2007) World biofuels assessment. Worldwide biomass potential: technology characterizations. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Dept. of Energy, Golden, CO. NREL/MP. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/42467.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2012
- Bombelli P, Bradley RW, Scott AM, Philips AJ, McCormick AJ, Cruz SM, Anderson A, Yunus K, Bendall DS, Cameron P, Davies J, Smith AG, Howe CJ, Fisher AC (2011) Quantitative analysis of the factors limiting solar power transduction by Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in biological photovoltaic devices. Energ Environ Sci 4:4690–4698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bombelli P, Zarrouati M, Thorne RJ, Schneider K, Rowden SJL, Ali A, Yunus K, Cameron PJ, Fisher AC, Wilson DI, Howe CJ, McCormick AJ (2012) Surface morphology and surface energy of anode materials influence power outputs in a multi-channel mediatorless bio-photovoltaic (BPV) system. Phys Chem Chem Phys. doi:10.1039/C2CP42526B
- Elsayed MA, Matthews R, Mortimer ND (2003) Carbon and balances for a range of biofuels options. Project number B/B6/00784/REP, URN 03/836. Sheffield Hallam University. http://www.rms.lv/bionett/Files/File/BioDE-2003-101%20DTI%20biodiesel%20LCA%20study.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2012
- IEA (2010) International Energy Agency, key world energy statistics. www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2010/key_stats_2010.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2012
- IFPB (2008) Increasing feedstock production for biofuels: economic drivers, environmental implications, and the role of research, the biomass research and development board. http://www.usbiomassboard.gov/pdfs/8_Increasing_Biofuels_Feedstock_Production.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2012
- IRRI (2012) International rice research institute: helps reduce global poverty & hunger by helping farmers grow more rice & keep people & the environment healthy. www.irri.org. Accessed 19 Jul 2012
- Park DH, Laivenieks M, Guettler MV, Jain MK, Zeikus JG (1999) Microbial utilization of electrically reduced neutral red as the sole electron donor for growth and metabolite production. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2912–2917Google Scholar
- Potter MC (1911) Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc R Soc London 81:465–480Google Scholar