Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 97, Issue 8, pp 3519–3533 | Cite as

Expression of salt-induced 2-Cys peroxiredoxin from Oryza sativa increases stress tolerance and fermentation capacity in genetically engineered yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Applied Genetics and Molecular Biotechnology

Abstract

Peroxiredoxins (Prxs), also termed thioredoxin peroxidases (TPXs), are a family of thiol-specific antioxidant enzymes that are critically involved in cell defense and protect cells from oxidative damage. In this study, a putative chloroplastic 2-Cys thioredoxin peroxidase (OsTPX) was identified by proteome analysis from leaf tissue samples of rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings exposed to 0.1 M NaCl for 3 days. To investigate the relationship between the OsTPX gene and the stress response, OsTPX was cloned into the yeast expression vector p426GPD under the control of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD1) promoter, and the construct was transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. OsTPX expression was confirmed by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses. OsTPX contained two highly conserved cysteine residues (Cys114 and Cys236) and an active site region (FTFVCPT), and it is structurally very similar to human 2-Cys Prx. Heterologous OsTPX expression increased the ability of the transgenic yeast cells to adapt and recover from reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced oxidative stresses, such as a reduction of cellular hydroperoxide levels in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and menadione, by improving redox homeostasis. OsTPX expression also conferred enhanced tolerance to tert-butylhydroperoxide, heat shock, and high ethanol concentrations. Furthermore, high OsTPX expression improved the fermentation capacity of the yeast during glucose-based batch fermentation at a high temperature (40 °C) and at the general cultivation temperature (30 °C). The alcohol yield in OsTPX-expressing transgenic yeast increased by approximately 29 % (0.14 g g−1) and 21 % (0.12 g g−1) during fermentation at 40 and 30 °C, respectively, compared to the wild-type yeast. Accordingly, OsTPX-expressing transgenic yeast showed prolonged cell survival during the environmental stresses produced during fermentation. These results suggest that heterologous OsTPX expression increases acquired tolerance to ROS-induced oxidative stress by improving cellular redox homeostasis and improves fermentation capacity due to improved cell survival during fermentation, especially at a high temperature.

Keywords

Thioredoxin peroxidase Stress response Fermentation Transgenic yeast 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ008115012012), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary material

253_2012_4410_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (94 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 94.2 kb)

References

  1. Ashraf M (2009) Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol Adv 27:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baier M, Diekz KJ (1999) Protective function of chloroplast 2-Cys peroxiredoxin in photosynthesis: evidence from transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 119:1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baier M, Noctor G, Foyer CH, Dietz KJ (2000) Antisense suppression of 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in Arabidopsis specifically enhances the activities and expression of enzymes associated with ascorbate metabolism but not glutathione metabolism. Plant Physiol 124:823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatt I, Tripathi BN (2011) Plant peroxiredoxins: catalytic mechanisms, functional significance and future perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 29:850–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao HF, Yen YF, Ku MS (2009) Characterization of a salt-induced DhAHP, a gene coding for alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, from the extremely halophilic yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. BMC Microbiol 9:182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dietz KJ (2007) The dual function of plant peroxiredoxins in antioxidant defence and redox signaling. Subcell Biochem 44:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietz KJ, Horling F, König J, Baier M (2002) The function of the chloroplast 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in peroxide detoxification and its regulation. J Exp Bot 53:1321–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dinakar C, Abhaypratap V, Yearla SR, Raghavendra AS, Padmasree K (2010) Importance of ROS and antioxidant system during the beneficial interactions of mitochondrial metabolism with photosynthetic carbon assimilation. Planta 231:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding J, Huang X, Zhang L, Zhao N, Yang D, Zhang K (2009) Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fomenko DE, Koc A, Agisheva N, Jacobsen M, Kaya A, Malinouski M, Rutherford JC, Siu KC, Jin DY, Winqe DR, Gladyshev VN (2011) Thiol peroxidases mediate specific genome-wide regulation of gene expression in response to hydrogen peroxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2729–2734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JP, Powell CD, Smart KA (2007) Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:535–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gietz RD, Woods RA (2001) Genetic transformation of yeast. Biotechniques 30:816–820Google Scholar
  13. González-Párraga P, Sánchez-Fresneda R, Martínez-Esparza M, Argüelles JC (2008) Stress responses in yeasts: what rules apply? Arch Microbiol 189:293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jönsson TJ, Lowther WT (2007) The peroxiredoxin repair proteins. Subcell Biochem 44:115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karplus PA, Hall A (2007) Structural survey of the peroxiredoxins. Subcell Biochem 44:41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim IS, Jin I, Yoon HS (2011a) Decarbonylated cyclophilin A Cpr1 protein protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae KNU5377Y when exposed to stress induced by menadione. Cell Stress Chaperones 16:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim IS, Kim YS, Yoon HS (2012) Rice ASR1 protein with reactive oxygen species scavenging and chaperone-like activities enhances acquired tolerance to abiotic stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cells 33:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim KH, Alam I, Lee KW, Sharmin SA, Kwak SS, Lee SY, Lee BY (2010) Enhanced tolerance of transgenic tall fescue plants overexpressing 2-Cys peroxiredoxin against methyl viologen and heat stresses. Biotechnol Lett 32:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim MD, Kim YH, Kwon SY, Jang BY, Lee SY, Yun DJ, Cho JH, Kwak SS, Lee HS (2011b) Overexpression of 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin enhances tolerance to methyl viologen-mediated oxidative stress and high temperature in potato plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kingston-Smith AH, Foyer CH (2000) Overexpression of Mn-superoxide dismutase in maize leaves leads to increased monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase and glutathione reductase activities. J Exp Bot 51:1867–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Komatsu S, Yamamoto R, Nanjo Y, Mikami Y, Yunokawa H, Sakata K (2009) A comprehensive analysis of the soybean genes and proteins expressed under flooding stress using transcriptome and proteome techniques. J Proteome Res 8:4766–4778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. König J, Lotte K, Plessow R, Brockhinke A, Baier M, Dietz KJ (2003) Reaction mechanism of plant 2-Cys peroxiredoxin. Role of the C terminus and the quaternary structure. J Biol Chem 278:24409–24420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma M, Liu ZL (2010) Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:829–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan BA, Veal EA (2007) Functions of typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxins in yeast. Subcell Biochem 44:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peng L, Kapp EA, McLauchlan D, Jordan TW (2011) Characterization of the Asia Oceania Human Proteome Organisation Membrane Proteomics Initiative Standard using SDS-PAGE shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 11:4376–4384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Ruiz JM, Spínola MC, Kirchsteiger K, Moreno J, Sahrawy M, Cejudo FJ (2006) Rice NTRC is a high-efficiency redox system for chloroplast protection against oxidative damage. Plant Cell 18:2356–2368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramagli LS, Rodriguez LV (1985) Quantitation of microgram amounts of protein in two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer. Electrophoresis 11:559–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rouhier N, Jacquot JP (2005) The plant multigenic family of thiol peroxidases. Free Radic Biol Med 38:1413–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rouhier N, Koh CS, Gelhaye E, Corbier C, Favier F, Didierjean C, Jacquot JP (2008) Redox based anti-oxidant systems in plants: biochemical and structural analyses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1780:1249–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schröder E, Littlechild JA, Lebedev AA, Errington N, Vagin AA, Isupov MN (2000) Crystal structure of decameric 2-Cys peroxiredoxin from human erythrocytes at 1.7 A resolution. Structure 8:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shima J, Takagi H (2009) Stress-tolerance of baker’s-yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells: stress-protective molecules and genes involved in stress tolerance. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 53:155–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sideri TC, Stojanovski K, Tuite MF, Grant CM (2010) Ribosome-associated peroxiredoxins suppress oxidative stress-induced de novo formation of the [PSI+] prion in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6394–6399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanley D, Bandara A, Fraser S, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA (2010) The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 109:13–24Google Scholar
  34. Tripathi BN, Bhatt I, Dietz KJ (2009) Peroxiredoxins: a less studied component of hydrogen peroxide detoxification in photosynthetic organisms. Protoplasma 235:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong CM, Siu KL, Jin DY (2004) Peroxiredoxin-null yeast cells are hypersensitive to oxidative stress and are genomically unstable. J Biol Chem 279:23207–23213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao XQ, Bai FW (2009) Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J Biotechnol 144:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Bio-resource Research Center, Department of Biology, College of Natural SciencesKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations