Laboratory metabolic evolution improves acetate tolerance and growth on acetate of ethanologenic Escherichia coli under non-aerated conditions in glucose-mineral medium
- 696 Downloads
In this work, Escherichia coli MG1655 was engineered to produce ethanol and evolved in a laboratory process to obtain an acetate tolerant strain called MS04 (E. coli MG1655: ΔpflB, ΔadhE, ΔfrdA, ΔxylFGH, ΔldhA, PpflB::pdc Zm -adhB Zm , evolved). The growth and ethanol production kinetics of strain MS04 were determined in mineral medium, mainly under non-aerated conditions, supplemented with glucose in the presence of different concentrations of sodium acetate at pH 7.0 and at different values of acid pH and a constant concentration of sodium acetate (2 g/l). Results revealed an increase in the specific growth rate, cell mass formation, and ethanol volumetric productivity at moderate concentrations of sodium acetate (2–10 g/l), in addition to a high tolerance to acetate because it was able to grow and produce a high yield of ethanol in the presence of up to 40 g/l of sodium acetate. Genomic analysis of the ΔpflB evolved strain identified that a chromosomal deletion of 27.3 kb generates the improved growth and acetate tolerance in MG1655 ΔpflB derivative strains. This deletion comprises genes related to the respiration of nitrate, repair of alkylated DNA and synthesis of the ompC gene coding for porin C, cytochromes C, thiamine, and colonic acid. Strain MS04 is advantageous for the production of ethanol from hemicellulosic hydrolysates that contain acetate.
KeywordsEscherichia coli Metabolic engineering Metabolic evolution Fuel ethanol Glucose Acetate
We thank Daniel Díaz-López, César Aguilar, Mercedes Enzaldo, Ramón de Anda, Georgina Hernández-Chávez, Iván Muñoz-Gutíerrez, and José Utrilla for their technical support during the project. This work was supported by the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT), grants Proinnova PETRAMIN 2011/154298-2012/181892; FONSEC/SSA 126793 and IMSS/ISSSTE 167756; and DGAPA/PAPIIT/UNAM IN221106 and IT200312-2. Marco T. Fernández-Sandoval held a scholarship from CONACyT.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- Böck A, Sawers G (1996) Fermentation. In: Neidhardt et al (eds) Escherichia coli and Salmonella, cellular and molecular biology, chapter 18, 2nd edn. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, pp 262–282Google Scholar
- Chohnan S, Furukawa H, Fujio T, Nishihara H, Takamura Y (1997) Changes in the size and composition of intracellular pools of nonesterified coenzyme A and coenzyme A thioesters in aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:553–560Google Scholar
- Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P (1998) Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Gen Res 8:195–202Google Scholar
- Hahm DH, Pan J, Rhee JS (1994) Characterization and evaluation of a pta (phosphotransacetylase)-negative mutant of Escherichia coli HB101 as production host of foreign lipase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 181:6656–6663Google Scholar
- Hino T, Esaki H, Miwa T, Umemori J (1997) Significance of H + -ATPase in acid tolerance of Escherichia coli. Bull Fac Agr Meiji Univ 113:1–9Google Scholar
- Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
- Nobelmann B, Lengeler JW (1996) Molecular analysis of the gat genes from Escherichia coli and of their roles in galactitol transport and metabolism. J Bacteriol 178(23):6790–6795Google Scholar
- O'sullivan E, Condon S (1999) Relationship between acid tolerance, cytoplasmic pH, and ATP and H+-ATPase levels in chemostat cultures of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(6):2287–2293Google Scholar
- Ohta K, Beall DS, Mejia JP, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO (1991) Genetic improvement of Escherichia coli for ethanol production: chromosomal integration of Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:893–900Google Scholar
- Orencio-Trejo M, Utrilla J, Fernández-Sandoval MT, Huerta-Beristain G, Gosset G, Martinez A (2010) Engineering the Escherichia coli fermentative metabolism. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 121:71–107Google Scholar
- Presser KA, Ratkowsky DA, Ross T (1997) Modelling the growth rate of Escherichia coli as a function of pH and lactic acid concentration. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2355–2360Google Scholar
- Roe AJ, O’Byrne C, McLaggan D, Booth IR (2002) Inhibition of Escherichia coli growth by acetic acid: a problem with methionine biosynthesis and homocysteine toxicity. Microbiol 148:2215–2222Google Scholar