Substrate range and enantioselectivity of epoxidation reactions mediated by the ethene-oxidising Mycobacterium strain NBB4
Mycobacterium strain NBB4 is an ethene-oxidising micro-organism isolated from estuarine sediments. In pursuit of new systems for biocatalytic epoxidation, we report the capacity of strain NBB4 to convert a diverse range of alkene substrates to epoxides. A colorimetric assay based on 4-(4-nitrobenzyl)pyridine) has been developed to allow the rapid characterisation and quantification of biocatalytic epoxide synthesis. Using this assay, we have demonstrated that ethene-grown NBB4 cells epoxidise a wide range of alkenes, including terminal (propene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene and 1-decene), cyclic (cyclopentene, cyclohexene), aromatic (styrene, indene) and functionalised substrates (allyl alcohol, dihydropyran and isoprene). Apparent specific activities have been determined and range from 2.5 to 12.0 nmol min−1 per milligram of cell protein. The enantioselectivity of epoxidation by Mycobacterium strain NBB4 has been established using styrene as a test substrate; (R)-styrene oxide is produced in enantiomeric excesses greater than 95%. Thus, the ethene monooxygenase of Mycobacterium NBB4 has a broad substrate range and promising enantioselectivity, confirming its potential as a biocatalyst for alkene epoxidation.
KeywordsBiocatalysis Epoxidation Alkene Mycobacterium Soluble di-iron monooxygenase Non-heme iron Oxidation
We thank the University of Sydney and the Australian Research Council (grant number DP0877315) for financial support.
- Coleman NV, Yau S, Wilson NL, Nolan LM, Migocki MD, Ly M, Crossett B, Holmes AJ (2011) Untangling the multiple monooxygenases of Mycobacterium chubuense strain NBB4, a versatile hydrocarbon degrader. Environ Microbiol Rep 3(3):297–307Google Scholar
- Fu H, Newcomb M, Wong CH (1991) Pseudomonas oleovorans monooxygenase catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation of allyl alcohol derivatives and hydroxylation of a hypersensitive radical probe with the radical ring-opening rate exceeding the oxygen rebound rate. J Am Chem Soc 113(15):5878–5880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hagen TJ (2007) Prilezhaev reaction. In: Li JJ, Corey EJ (eds) Name reactions for functional group transformations. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 274–281Google Scholar
- Hartmans SFJ, Weber DP, Somhorst M, de Bont JAM (1991) Alkene monooxygenase from Mycobacterium: a multicomponent enzyme. J Gen Microbiol 137:2555–2560Google Scholar
- Mahmoudian M, Michael A (1992a) Biocatalysts for production of chiral epoxides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 37(1):23–27Google Scholar
- Mattes TE, Alexander AK, Coleman NV (2010) Aerobic biodegradation of the chloroethenes: pathways, enzymes, ecology, and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:445–475Google Scholar
- Oyama ST (2008) Rates, kinetics, and mechanisms of epoxidation: homogeneous, heterogeneous, and biological routes. In: Oyama ST (ed) Mechanisms in homogeneous and heterogeneous epoxidation catalysis, vol 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 4–10Google Scholar
- Panke S, Witholt B, Schmid A, Wubbolts MG (1998) Towards a biocatalyst for (S)-styrene oxide production: characterization of the styrene degradation pathway of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(6):2032–2043Google Scholar
- van Beilen, JB, Funhoff EG (2007) Alkane hydroxylases involved in microbial alkane degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74(1):13–21Google Scholar