Anaerobic xylose fermentation by Spathaspora passalidarum
A cost-effective conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into bioethanol requires that the xylose released from the hemicellulose fraction (20–40% of biomass) can be fermented. Baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, efficiently ferments glucose but it lacks the ability to ferment xylose. Xylose-fermenting yeast such as Pichia stipitis requires accurately controlled microaerophilic conditions during the xylose fermentation, rendering the process technically difficult and expensive. In this study, it is demonstrated that under anaerobic conditions Spathaspora passalidarum showed high ethanol production yield, fast cell growth, and rapid sugar consumption with xylose being consumed after glucose depletion, while P. stipitis was almost unable to utilize xylose under these conditions. It is further demonstrated that for S. passalidarum, the xylose conversion takes place by means of NADH-preferred xylose reductase (XR) and NAD+-dependent xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH). Thus, the capacity of S. passalidarum to utilize xylose under anaerobic conditions is possibly due to the balance between the cofactor’s supply and demand through this XR–XDH pathway. Only few XRs with NADH preference have been reported so far. 2-Deoxy glucose completely inhibited the conversion of xylose by S. passalidarum under anaerobic conditions, but only partially did that under aerobic conditions. Thus, xylose uptake by S. passalidarum may be carried out by different xylose transport systems under anaerobic and aerobic conditions. The presence of glucose also repressed the enzymatic activity of XR and XDH from S. passalidarum as well as the activities of those enzymes from P. stipitis.
KeywordsXylose fermentation Cofactor balance Xylose reductase Xylitol dehydrogenase Glucose repression
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Ingelis Larsen and Annette Eva Jensen for their help on high-performance liquid chromatography analysis; to Anders Brandt for helpful discussions; and to Anders Brandt, Klaus Breddam, and Kim Pilegaard for comments and proofreading of the manuscript.
- Bicho PA, Runnals PL, Cunningham JD, Lee H (1988) Induction of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase-activities in Pachysolen tannophilus and Pichia stipitis on mixed sugars. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:50–54Google Scholar
- Heredia MF, Heredia CF (1988) Saccharomyces cerevisiae acquires resistance to 2-deoxyglucose at a very high frequency. J Bacteriol 170:2870–2872Google Scholar
- Ho NW, Chen Z, Brainard AP (1998) Genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(5):1852–1859Google Scholar
- Jeppsson M, Bengtsson O, Franke K, Lee H, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2006) The expression of a Pichia stipitis xylose reductase mutant with higher K (m) for NADPH increases ethanol production from xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(4):665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petschacher B, Nidetzky B (2008) Altering the coenzyme preference of xylose reductase to favor utilization of NADH enhances ethanol yield from xylose in a metabolically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell 7:9Google Scholar
- Renewable Fuels Association (2011) 2011 Ethanol industry outlook. http://ethanolrfa.org/pages/annual-industry-outlook. Accessed 20 May 2011
- Skoog K, Hahn-Hagerdal B (1990) Effect of oxygenation on xylose fermentation by Pichia stipitis. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(11):3389–3394Google Scholar
- Toivola A, Yarrow D, Vandenbosch E, Vandijken JP, Scheffers WA (1984) Alcoholic fermentation of d-xylose by yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:1221–1223Google Scholar
- van Maris AJ, Winkler AA, Kuyper M, de Laat WT, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2007) Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: xylose isomerase as a key component. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:179–204Google Scholar
- Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Vandijken JP (1990) Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol 136:395–403Google Scholar
- Wiegel J, Carreira LH, Mothershed CP, Puls J (1983) Production of ethanol from bio-polymers by anaerobic, thermophilic, and extreme thermophilic bacteria. II. Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus JW200 and its mutants in batch cultures and resting cell experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng 193–205Google Scholar
- Wohlbach DJ, Kuo A, Sato TK, Potts KM, Salamov AA, Labutti KM, Sun H, Clum A, Pangilinan JL, Lindquist EA, Lucas S, Lapidus A, Jin M, Gunawan C, Balan V, Dale BE, Jeffries TW, Zinkel R, Barry KW, Grigoriev IV (2011) Comparative genomics of xylose-fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production. PNAS 108(32):13212–13217CrossRefGoogle Scholar