Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 1021–1030 | Cite as

Controlling the oxidoreduction potential of the culture of Clostridium acetobutylicum leads to an earlier initiation of solventogenesis, thus increasing solvent productivity

  • Shaohua Wang
  • Yan Zhu
  • Yanping ZhangEmail author
  • Yin LiEmail author
Biotechnological products and process engineering

Abstract

Fermentative production of solvents (acetone, butanol, and ethanol) by Clostridium acetobutylicum is generally a biphasic process consisting of acidogenesis and solventogenesis. We report that the biphasic metabolism of C. acetobutylicum could be changed by oxidoreduction potential (ORP) regulation. When using air to control the ORP of the fermentation broth at −290 mV, an earlier initiation of solventogenesis was achieved. Solvent production reached 25.6 g l−1 (2.8 g acetone l−1, 16.8 g butanol l−1, 6.0 g ethanol l−1), a 35% increase compared with the ORP uncontrolled process. Metabolic flux analysis revealed that there was a general increase of the central carbon flux in the first 24 h of fermentation when ORP was controlled at −290 mV, compared with the control. Specifically, the solvent ratio (acetone:butanol:ethanol) was changed from 25:64:11 to 11:66:23 at ORP level of −290 mV, which might have resulted from the rigidity at acetyl-CoA node and the flexibility at acetoacetyl-CoA and butyryl-CoA nodes in response to ORP regulation.

Keywords

Clostridium acetobutylicum Oxidoreduction potential (redox potential) Solvent productivity Earlier initiation of solventogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2011AA02A208), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30900012), and the Scientific Equipment R&D Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. YZ200941). Yin Li is supported by the Hundreds Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References

  1. Assobhei O, Kanouni AE, Ismaili M, Loutfi M, Petitdemange H (1998) Effect of acetic and butyric acids on the stability of solvent and spore formation by Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 during repeated subculturing. J Ferment Bioeng 85(2):209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahl H, Gottwald M, Kuhn A, Rale V, Andersch W, Gottschalk G (1986) Nutritional factors affecting the ratio of solvents produced by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 52(1):169–172Google Scholar
  3. Bourel G, Henini S, Divies C, Garmyn D (2003) The response of Leuconostoc mesenteroides to low external oxidoreduction potential generated by hydrogen gas. J Appl Microbiol 94(2):280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buday Z, Linden JC, Karima MN (1990) Improved acetone–butanol fermentation analysis using subambient HPLC column temperature. Enzyme Microb Technol 12(1):24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desai RP, Nielsen LK, Papoutsakis ET (1999) Stoichiometric modeling of Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentations with non-linear constraints. J Biotechnol 71(1–3):191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Girbal L, Soucaille P (1994) Regulation of Clostridium acetobutylicum metabolism as revealed by mixed-substrate steady-state continuous cultures: role of NADH/NAD ratio and ATP pool. J Bacteriol 176(21):6433–6438Google Scholar
  7. Girbal L, Vasconcelos I, Saint-Amans S, Soucaille P (1995) How neutral red modified carbon and electron flow in Clostridium acetobutylicum grown in chemostat culture. FEMS Microbiol Rev 16(2–3):151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris LM, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET (2002) Northern, morphological, and fermentation analysis of spo0A inactivation and overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 184(13):3586–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartmanis MG, Gatenbeck S (1984) Intermediary metabolism in Clostridium acetobutylicum: levels of enzymes involved in the formation of acetate and butyrate. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(6):1277–1283Google Scholar
  10. Hirsch A, Grinsted E (1954) Methods for the growth and enumeration of anaerobic spore-formers from cheese, with observations on the effect of nisin. J Dairy Res 21:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husson F, Tu VP, Santiago-Gomez M, Cachon R, Feron G, Nicaud JM, Kermasha S, Belin JM (2006) Effect of redox potential on the growth of Yarrowia lipolytica and the biosynthesis and activity of heterologous hydroperoxide lyase. J Mol Catal B Enzym 39:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishizaki A, Snibai H, Hirose Y (1974) Basic aspects of electrode potential change in submerged fermentation. Agric Biol Chem 38:2399–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones DT, Woods DR (1986) Acetone–butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev 50(4):484–524Google Scholar
  14. Junelles AM, Janati-Idrissi R, Petitdemange H, Gay R (1988) Iron effect on acetone–butanol fermentation. Curr Microbiol 17:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim O, Rakesh B, Eugene LI (1988) Redox potential in acetone–butanol fermentations. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 18(1):175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lutke-Eversloh T, Bahl H (2011) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum: recent advances to improve butanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer CL, Papoutsakis ET (1989) Increased levels of ATP and NADH are associated with increased solvent production in continuous cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 30(5):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer CL, Roos JW, Papoutsakis ET (1986) Carbon monoxide gasing leads to alcohol production and butyrate uptake without acetone formation in continuous cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 24:159–167Google Scholar
  19. Ouvry A, Wache Y, Tourdot-Marechal R, Divies C, Cachon R (2002) Effects of oxidoreduction potential combined with acetic acid, NaCl and temperature on the growth, acidification, and membrane properties of Lactobacillus plantarum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 214(2):257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papoutsakis ET (1984) Equations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng 26(2):174–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peguin S, Goma G, Delorme P, Soucaille P (1994) Metabolic flexibility of CIostridium acetobutylicum in response to methyl viologen addition. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 42:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rao G, Mutharasan R (1986) Alcohol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum induced by methyl viologen. Biotechnol Lett 8(12):893–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao G, Mutharasan R (1987) Altered electron flow in continuous cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum induced by viologen dyes. Appl Environ Microbiol 53(6):1232–1235Google Scholar
  24. Rao G, Mutharasan R (1989) NADH levels and solventogenesis in Clostridium acetobutylicum: new insights through culture fluorescence. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 30(1):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rathin D, Zeikus JG (1985) Modulation of acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation by carbon monoxide and organic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 49(3):522–529Google Scholar
  26. Ravagnani A, Jennert KC, Steiner E, Grunberg R, Jefferies JR, Wilkinson SR, Young DI, Tidswell EC, Brown DP, Youngman P, Morris JG, Young M (2000) Spo0A directly controls the switch from acid to solvent production in solvent-forming clostridia. Mol Microbiol 37(5):1172–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riondet C, Cachon R, Wache Y, Alcaraz G, Divies C (1999) Changes in the proton-motive force in Escherichia coli in response to external oxidoreduction potential. Eur J Biochem 262:595–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Riondet C, Cachon R, Wache Y, Alcaraz G, Divie C (2000) Extracellular oxidoreduction potential modifies carbon and electron flow in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 182(3):620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET (2008) Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: part I. Metabolic network resolution and analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 101(5):1036–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sillers R, Chow A, Tracy B, Papoutsakis ET (2008) Metabolic engineering of the non-sporulating, non-solventogenic Clostridium acetobutylicum strain M5 to produce butanol without acetone demonstrate the robustness of the acid-formation pathways and the importance of the electron balance. Metab Eng 10(6):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sillers R, Al-Hinai MA, Papoutsakis ET (2009) Aldehyde-alcohol dehydrogenase and/or thiolase overexpression coupled with CoA transferase downregulation lead to higher alcohol titers and selectivity in Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(1):38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sridhar J, Eiteman MA (1999) Influence of redox potential on product distribution in Clostridium thermosuccinogenes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 82:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomas CA, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET (2003) Overexpression of groESL in Clostridium acetobutylicum results in increased solvent production and tolerance, prolonged metabolism, and changes in the cell's transcriptional program. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(8):4951–4965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang S, Zhang Y, Dong H, Mao S, Zhu Y, Wang R, Luan G, Li Y (2011) Formic acid triggers the “acid crash” of acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(5):1674–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yerushalmi L, Volesky B, Szczesny T (1985) Effect of increased hydrogen partial pressure on the acetone–butanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 22:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Y, Wang S, Liu W, Li Y (2010) Equipment for automatic control of oxidoreduction potential and its utilization. China Patent 201010593474.3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations