Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 671–678 | Cite as

Enhanced production of nukacin D13E in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 by the additional expression of immunity genes

  • Tijo Varghese Puramattathu
  • Mohammad R. Islam
  • Mami Nishie
  • Sae Yanagihara
  • Jun-ichi Nagao
  • Ken-ichi Okuda
  • Takeshi Zendo
  • Jiro Nakayama
  • Kenji SonomotoEmail author
Applied genetics and molecular biotechnology

Abstract

Nukacin D13E (D13E) is a variant of type-A(II) lantibiotic nukacin ISK-1 produced by Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1. D13E exhibited a twofold higher specific antimicrobial activity than nukacin ISK-1 against a number of Gram-positive bacteria. We previously reported the heterologous production of D13E in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 under the control of nisin-controlled gene expression system. In this study, we demonstrated enhanced production of D13E by the additional expression of immunity genes, nukFEG. The nukacin ISK-1 immunity, conferred by the ABC transporter complex, NukFEG, and the lantibiotic-binding protein, NukH, was not overwhelmed by D13E. The additional NukFEG resulted in a fourfold increase in the immunity level of the strain and a 5.2-fold increase in D13E production. The additional NukFEGH-expressing strain with the highest D13E immunity showed reduced level of production. Further improvement in D13E production was achieved by using pH-controlled batch fermentation.

Keywords

Lantibiotic Nukacin ISK-1 Nisin-controlled gene expression Immunity genes Fermentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Shun Iwatani for his helpful suggestions. This work was partially supported by grants from the following organizations: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the Japan Science Society, the Novartis Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science, the Novozymes Japan Research Fund, and the Nagase Science and Technology Foundation.

Supplementary material

253_2011_3563_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (67 kb)
ESM 1 (Pdf 66.5 kb)

References

  1. Asaduzzaman SM, Sonomoto K (2009) Lantibiotics: diverse activities and unique modes of action. J Biosci Bioeng 107:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aso Y, Nagao J, Koga H, Okuda K, Kamenasa Y, Sashihara T, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2004a) Heterologous expression and functional analysis of the gene cluster for the biosynthesis of and immunity to the lantibiotic, nukacin ISK-1. J Biosci Bioeng 98:429–436Google Scholar
  3. Aso Y, Sashihara T, Nagao J, Kanemasa Y, Koga H, Hashimoto T, Higuchi T, Adachi A, Nomiyama H, Ishizaki A, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2004b) Characterization of a gene cluster of Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1 encoding the biosynthesis of and immunity to the lantibiotic, nukacin ISK-1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68:1663–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aso Y, Okuda K, Nagao J, Kanemasa Y, Phuong NTB, Koga H, Shioya K, Sashihara T, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2005) A novel type of immunity protein, NukH, for the lantibiotic nukacin ISK-1 produced by Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:1403–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheigh CI, Park H, Choi HJ, Pyun YR (2005) Enhanced nisin production by increasing genes involved in nisin Z biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A164. Biotechnol Lett 27:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotter PD, Draper LA, Lawton EM, McAuliffe O, Hill C, Ross RP (2006) Overproduction of wild-type and bioengineered derivatives of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4492–4496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Man JC, Rogosa M, Sharpe ME (1960) A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J Appl Bact 23:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, Beerthuyzen MM, van Alen-Boerrigter I, de Vos WM (1996a) Functional analysis of promoters in the nisin gene cluster of Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol 178:3434–3439Google Scholar
  9. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM (1996b) Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3662–3667Google Scholar
  10. Delgado A, Brito D, Fevereiro P, Tenreiro R, Peres C (2005) Bioactivity quantification of crude bacteriocin solutions. J Microbiol Methods 62:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dufour A, Hindré T, Haras D, Pennec JL (2007) The biology of lantibiotics from the lacticin 481 group is coming of age. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:134–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field D, Hill C, Cotter PD, Ross RP (2010) The dawning of a ‘Golden era’ in lantibiotic bioengineering. Mol Microbiol 78:1077–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinzmann S, Entian KD, Stein T (2006) Engineering Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 for improved production of the lantibiotic subtilin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:532–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hille M, Kies S, Götz F, Peschel A (2001) Dual role of GdmH in producer immunity and secretion of the staphylococcal lantibiotics gallidermin and epidermin. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1380–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holo H, Nes IF (1995) Transformation of Lactococcus by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol 47:195–199Google Scholar
  16. Islam MR, Shioya K, Nagao J, Nishie M, Jikuya H, Zendo T, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2009) Evaluation of essential and variable residues of nukacin ISK-1 by NNK scanning. Mol Microbiol 72:1438–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim WS, Hall RJ, Dunn NW (1997) The effect of nisin concentration and nutrient depletion on nisin production of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura H, Nagano R, Matsusaki H, Sonomoto K, Ishizaki A (1997) A bacteriocin of strain Pediococcus sp. ISK-1 isolated from Nukadoko, bed of fermented rice bran. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 61:1049–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleerebezem M, Beerthuyzen MM, Vaughan EE, de Vos WM, Kuipers OP (1997) Controlled gene expression systems for lactic acid bacteria: transferable nisin-inducible expression cassettes for Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Lactobacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4581–4584Google Scholar
  20. Li JWH, Vederas JC (2009) Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science 325:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Okuda K, Aso Y, Nagao J, Shioya K, Kanemasa Y, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2005) Characterization of functional domains of lantibiotic-binding immunity protein, NukH, from Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 250:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okuda K, Aso Y, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2008a) Cooperative transport between NukFEG and NukH in immunity against the lantibiotic nukacin ISK-1 produced by Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1. J Bacteriol 190:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okuda K, Yanagihara S, Shioya K, Harada Y, Nagao J, Aso Y, Zendo T, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2008b) Binding specificity of the lantibiotic binding immunity protein NukH. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7613–7619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okuda K, Yanagihara S, Sugayama T, Zendo T, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2010) Functional significance of the E loop, a novel motif conserved in the lantibiotic immunity ATP-binding cassette transport systems. J Bacteriol 192:2801–2808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peschel A, Schnell N, Hille M, Entian KD, Götz F (1997) Secretion of the lantibiotics epidermin and gallidermin: sequence analysis of the genes gdmT and gdmH, their influence on epidermin production and their regulation by EpiQ. Mol Gen Genet 254:312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rink R, Wierenga J, Kuipers A, Kluskens LD, Driessen AJM, Kuipers OP, Moll GN (2007) Dissection and modulation of the four distinct activities of nisin by mutagenesis of rings A and B and by C-terminal truncation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5809–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sashihara T, Kimura H, Higuchi T, Adachi A, Matsusaki H, Sonomoto K, Ishizaki A (2000) A novel lantibiotic, nukacin ISK-1, of Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1: cloning of the structural gene and identification of the structure. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64:2420–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Şimşek Ö, Çon AH, Akkoç N, Saris PEJ, Akçelik M (2009) Influence of growth conditions on the nisin production of bioengineered Lactococcus lactis strains. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith L, Hillman JD (2008) Therapeutic potential of type A (I) lantibiotics, a group of cationic peptide antibiotics. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Valsesia G, Medaglia G, Held M, Minas W, Panke S (2007) Circumventing the effect of product toxicity: development of a novel two-stage production process for the lantibiotic gallidermin. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tijo Varghese Puramattathu
    • 1
  • Mohammad R. Islam
    • 1
  • Mami Nishie
    • 1
  • Sae Yanagihara
    • 1
  • Jun-ichi Nagao
    • 2
  • Ken-ichi Okuda
    • 1
  • Takeshi Zendo
    • 1
  • Jiro Nakayama
    • 1
  • Kenji Sonomoto
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Division of Applied Molecular Microbiology and Biomass Chemistry, Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate SchoolKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Section of Infection Biology, Department of Functional BioscienceFukuoka Dental CollegeFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Laboratory of Functional Food Design, Department of Functional Metabolic Design, Bio-Architecture CenterKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations