Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 93, Issue 6, pp 2633–2643 | Cite as

Effect of compost, nitrogen salts, and NPK fertilizers on methane oxidation potential at different temperatures

  • Louis-B. JugniaEmail author
  • Yaseen Mottiar
  • Euphrasie Djuikom
  • Alexandre R. Cabral
  • Charles W. Greer
Environmental biotechnology

Abstract

The effects of compost, nitrogen salts, and nitrogen–phosphorous–potassium (NPK) fertilizers on the methane oxidation potential (MOP) of landfill cover soil at various temperatures were assessed. For this, we used batch assays conducted at 5°C, 15°C, and 25°C with microcosms containing landfill cover soil slurries amended with these elements. Results indicated variable impacts dependent on the type of amendment and the incubation temperature. For a given incubation temperature, MOP varied from one compost to another and with the amount of compost added, except for the shrimp/peat compost. With this latter compost, independent of the amount, MOP values remained similar and were significantly higher than those obtained with other composts. Amendment with most of the tested nitrogen salts led to similar improvements in methanotrophic activity, except for urea. MOP with NPK fertilizer addition was amongst the highest in this study; the minimum value obtained with NPK (20–0–20) suggested the importance of P for methanotrophs. MOP generally increased with temperature, and nutrient limitation became less important at higher temperatures. Overall, at each of the three temperatures tested, MOP with NPK fertilizer amendments provided the best results and was comparable to those observed with the addition of the shrimp/peat compost. The results of this study provide the first evidence of the following: (1) compost addition to improve methanotrophic activity in a landfill cover soil should consider the amount and type of compost used and (2) the importance of using NPK fertilizers rather than nitrogen salts, in enhancing this activity, primarily at low temperatures. One can also consider the potential beneficial impact of adding these elements to enhance plant growth, which is an advantage for MOP.

Keywords

Methanotrophs Potential activity Compost Nitrogen salts NPK fertilizers 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the National Research Council Canada through the Biotechnology Research Institute including a summer research studentship for Y.M. Also, E.D. was supported by the fellowship program “Professeur Invité du Sud” from “l'Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie”, sponsored by A.R.C. We also acknowledge the contribution of Waste Management and NSERC (Canada) under the Cooperative Research and Development grant CRD 379885-08.

References

  1. Aït-Benichou S, Jugnia L-B, Greer CW, Cabral A (2009) Methanotrophs and methanotrophic activity in engineered landfill biocovers. Waste Manage 29:2509–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albanna M, Fernandes L (2009) Effects of temperature, moisture content, and fertilizer addition on biological methane oxidation in landfill cover soils. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 13:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral J, Ren T, Knowles R (1998) Atmospheric methane consumption by forest soils and extracted bacteria at different pH values. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2397–2402Google Scholar
  4. Arthur E, Cornelis WM, Vermang J, De Rocker E (2011) Amending a loamy sand with three compost types: impact on soil quality. Soil Use Manage 27:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babu YJ, Nayak DR, Adhya TK (2006) Potassium application reduces methane emission from a flooded field planted to rice. Biol Fertil Soils 42:532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlaz MA, Green RB, Chanton JP, Goldsmith CD, Hater GR (2004) Evaluation of a biologically active cover for mitigation of landfill gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol 38:4891–4899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bédard C, Knowles R (1989) Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol Rev 53:68–84Google Scholar
  9. Bin L, Monreal CM, Tambong JT, Miguez CB, Carrasco-Medina L (2009) Phylogenetic analysis of methanotrophic communities in cover soils of a landfill in Ontario. Can J Microbiol 55:1103–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bodelier PLE, Laanbroek HJ (2004) Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bodelier PLE, Roslev P, Hencke T, Frenzel P (2000) Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature 403:421–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O (1996) Methane oxidation in a neutral landfill cover soil: influence of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen-turnover. J Environ Qual 25:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Villaralvo I (1996) Methane emission from landfill and the methane oxidizing capacity of its covering soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1397–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Börjesson G, Sundh I, Svensson BH (2004) Microbial oxidation of CH4 at different temperatures in landfill cover soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cabral AR, Moreira JF, Jugnia L-B (2010) Biocover performance of landfill methane oxidation: experimental results. J Environ Eng ASCE 138:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christophersen M, Linderod L, Jensen PE, Kjeldsen P (2000) Methane oxidation at low temperatures in soil exposed to landfill gas. J Environ Qual 29:1989–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Czepiel PM, Mosher B, Crill PM, Harriss RC (1996) Quantifying the effects of oxidation on landfill methane emissions. J Geophys Res 101:16721–16729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Visscher A, Van Cleemput O (2003) Induction of enhanced CH4 oxidation in soils: NH4+ inhibition patterns. Soil Biol Biochem 35:907–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Visscher A, Boeckx TP, Van Cleemput O (1999) Methane oxidation in simulated landfill cover soil environments. Environ Sci Technol 33:1854–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Visscher A, Schippers M, Van Cleemput O (2001) Short-term kinetic response of enhanced methane oxidation in landfill cover soils to environmental factors. Biol Fertil Soils 33:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delgado JA, Mosier AR (1996) Mitigation alternatives to decrease nitrous oxide emissions and urea-nitrogen loss and their effect on methane flux. J Environ Qual 25:1105–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dubey SK, Singh JS (2000) Spatio-temporal variation and effect of urea fertilization on methanotrophs in a tropical dryland rice field. Soil Biol Biochem 32:521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunfield PF, Topp E, Archambault C, Knowles R (1995) Effect of nitrogen frtilizers and moisture content on CH4 fluxes in a humisol: measurements in the field and intact soil cores. Biogeochemistry 29:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Einola J-KM, Kettunena RH, Rintala JA (2007) Responses of methane oxidation to temperature and water content in cover soil of a boreal landfill. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garcia-Gil JC, Plaza C, Soler-Rovira P, Polo A (2000) Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1907–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebert J, Gröngröft A, Miehlich G (2003) Kinetics of microbial landfill methane oxidation in biofilters. Waste Manage 23:609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilger HA, Humer M (2003) Biotic landfill cover treatments for mitigating methane emissions. Environ Monit Assess 84:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hilger HA, Barlaz MA, Wollum AG (2000) Landfill methane oxidation response to vegetation, fertilization, and liming. J Environ Qual 29:324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Humer M, Lechner P (1999) Methane oxidation in compost cover layers of landfills. In: Proceeding of the Sardinia 99, 7th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  30. Humer M, Lechner P (2001) Microbial methane oxidation for the reduction of landfill gas emissions. J Solid Waste Technol Manage 27:146–151Google Scholar
  31. Hütsch BW, Webster CP, Powlson DS (1994) Methane oxidation in soil as affected by land-use, soil-pH and N-fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1613–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones HA, Nedwell DB (1993) Methane emission and methane oxidation in landfill cover soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 102:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jugnia L-B, Roy R, Pacheco-Oliver M, Planas D, Miguez CB, Greer CW (2006) Potential activity and diversity of methanotrophs in forest soil, peat, and sediments from hydro-electric reservoir (Robert Bourassa) and lakes in the Canadian taiga. Soil Sci 171:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jugnia L-B, Cabral AR, Greer CW (2008) Biotic methane oxidation within an instrumented experimental landfill cover. Ecol Eng 33:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kallistova AY, Kevbrina MV, Nekrasova VK, Glagolev MV, Serebryanaya MI, Nozhevnikova AN (2005) Methane oxidation in landfill cover soil. Microbiol 74:608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kettunen RH, Einola J-KM, Rintala JA (2006) Landfill methane oxidation in engineered soil columns at low temperature. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kightley D, Nedwell DB, Cooper M (1995) Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:592–601Google Scholar
  39. Lee S-W, Im J, Dispirito AA, Bodrossy L, Barcelona MJ, Semrau JD (2009) Effect of nutrient and selective inhibitor amendments on methane oxidation, nitrous oxide production, and key gene presence and expression in landfill cover soils: characterization of the role of methanotrophs, nitrifiers, and denitrifiers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maurice C, Lagerkvist A (2004) Assessment of methane oxidation capacity of soil. Waste Manage Res 22:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moona K-E, Lee S-Y, Lee SH, Ryu HW, Cho K-S (2010) Earthworm cast as a promising filter bed material and its methanotrophic contribution to methane removal. J Hazard Mater 176:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park JR, Moon S, Ahn YM, Kim JY, Nam K (2005) Determination of environmental factors influencing methane oxidation in a sandy landfill cover soil. Environ Technol 26:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pawlowska M, Stepniewski W (2006) An influence of methane concentration on the methanotrophic activity of a model landfill cover. Ecol Eng 2(6):392–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pérez-Piqueres A, Edel-Hermann V, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C (2006) Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 38:460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perucci P, Dumontet S, Bufo SA, Mazzatura A, Casuci C (2000) Effects of organic amendment and herbicide treatment on soil microbial biomass. Biol Fertil Soil 32:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Powelson DK, Chanton J, Abichou T, Morales J (2006) Methane oxidation in water-spreading and compost biofilters. Waste Manage Res 24:528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy R, Greer CW (2000) Hexadecane mineralization and denitrification in two diesel fuel-contaminated soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saison C, Degrange V, Oliver R, Millard P, Commeaux C, Montange D, Le Roux X (2006) Alteration and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community. Environ Microbiol 8:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seghers D, Top EM, Reheul D, Bulcke R, Boeckx P, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Long-term effects of mineral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community in agricultural soils. Environ Microbiol 5:867–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shiralipoura A, McConnella DB, Smith WH (1992) Uses and benefits of MSW compost: a review and an assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 3:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sitaula BK, Hansen S, Sitaula JIB, Bakken LR (2000) Methane oxidation potentials and fluxes in agricultural soil: effects of fertilisation and soil compaction. Biogeochemistry 48:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Straska F, Crha J, Musilova M, Kuncarova M (1999) LFG-biofilters on old landfills. In: Proceeding of the Sardinia 99, 7th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  53. Trotsenko YA, Shishkina VN (1990) Studies on phosphate metabolism in obligate methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol Rev 87:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whalen SC, Reeburgh WS, Sandbeck KA (1990) Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3405–3411Google Scholar
  55. Willison TW, Webster CP, Goulding KWT, Powlson DS (1995) Methane oxidation in temperate soils-effects of land-use and the chemical form of nitrogen-fertilizer. Chemosphere 30:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilshusen JP, Hettiaratchi JPA, Stein VB (2004) Long-term behavior of passively aerated compost methanotrophic biofilter columns. Waste Manage 24:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth Sci Rev 57:177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zheng Y, Zhang LM, Zheng YM, Di H, He JZ (2008) Abundance and community composition of methanotrophs in a Chinese paddy soil under long-term fertilization practices. J Soils Sediments 8:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zinder SH (1993) Physiological ecology of methanogens. In: Ferry JG (ed) Methanogenesis. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 35–80Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis-B. Jugnia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yaseen Mottiar
    • 1
  • Euphrasie Djuikom
    • 2
  • Alexandre R. Cabral
    • 3
  • Charles W. Greer
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Council CanadaBiotechnology Research InstituteMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of DoualaDoualaCameroon
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations