Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Optimization of fixation methods for observation of bacterial cell morphology and surface ultrastructures by atomic force microscopy

  • 3770 Accesses

  • 84 Citations

Abstract

Fixation ability of five common fixation solutions, including 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 10% formalin, 4% paraformaldehyde, methanol/acetone (1:1), and ethanol/acetic acid (3:1) were evaluated by using atomic force microscopy in the present study. Three model bacteria, i.e., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus subtilis were applied to observe the above fixation methods for the morphology preservation of bacterial cells and surface ultrastructures. All the fixation methods could effectively preserve cell morphology. However, for preserving bacterial surface ultrastructures, the methods applying aldehyde fixations performed much better than those using alcohols, since the alcohols could detach the surface filaments (i.e., flagella and pili) significantly. Based on the quantitative and qualitative assessments, the 2.5% glutaraldehyde was proposed as a promising fixation solution both for observing morphology of both bacterial cell and surface ultrastructures, while the methonal/acetone mixture was the worst fixation solution which may obtain unreliable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Alsteens D, Verbelen C, Dague E, Raze D, Baulard AR, Dufrêne YF (2008) Organization of the mycobacterial cell wall: a nanoscale view. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 456:117–125

  2. Andre G, Kulakauskas S, Chapot-Chartier MP, Navet B, Deghorain M, Bernard E, Hols P, Dufrêne YF (2010) Imaging the nanoscale organization of peptidoglycan in living Lactococcus lactis cells. Nat Commun 1:27

  3. Arce FT, Carlson R, Monds J, Veeh R, Hu FZ, Stewart PS, Lal R, Ehrlich GD, Avci R (2009) Nanoscale structural and mechanical properties of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae biofilms. J Bacteriol 191:2512–2520

  4. Auerbach ID, Sorensen C, Hansma HG, Holden PA (2000) Physical morphology and surface properties of unsaturated Pseudomonas putida biofilms. J Bacteriol 182:3809–3815

  5. Bolshakova AV, Kiselyova OI, Filonov AS, Frolova OY, Lyubchenko YL, Yaminsky IV (2001) Comparative studies of bacteria with an atomic force microscopy operating in different modes. Ultramicroscopy 86:121–128

  6. Bolshakova AV, Kiselyova OI, Yaminsky IV (2004) Microbial surfaces investigated using atomic force microscopy. Biotechnol Prog 20:1615–1622

  7. Camesano TA, Natan MJ, Logan BE (2000) Observation of changes in bacterial cell morphology using tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 16:4563–4572

  8. Celie JWAM, Beelen RHJ, van den Born J (2005) Effect of fixation protocols on in situ detection of L-selectin ligands. J Immunol Methods 298:155–159

  9. Dapson RW (2007) Macromolecular changes caused by formalin fixation and antigen retrieval. Biotech Histochem 82:133–140

  10. Dorobantu LS, Bhattacharjee S, Foght JM, Gray MR (2008) Atomic force microscopy measurement of heterogeneity in bacterial surface hydrophobicity. Langmuir 24:4944–4951

  11. Gaboriaud F, Dufrêne YF (2007) Atomic force microscopy of microbial cells: application to nanomechanical properties, surface forces and molecular recognition forces. Colloids Surf B 54:10–19

  12. Handa H, Gurczynski S, Jackson MP, Mao G (2010) Immobilization and molecular interactions between bacteriophage and lipopolysaccharide bilayers. Langmuir 26:12095–12103

  13. Harada Y, Sone H, Hosaka S (2008) Estimation of three-dimensional atomic force microscope tip shape from atomic force microscope image for accurate measurement. Jpn J Appl Phys 47:6186–6189

  14. Hoetelmans RWM, Prins FA, Cornelese-ten Velde I, van der Meer J, van der Velde CJH, van Dierendonck JH (2001) Effects of acetone, methanol, or paraformaldehyde on cellular structure, visualized by reflection contrast microscopy and transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 9:346–351

  15. Jaschke M, Butt HJ, Wolff EK (1994) Imaging flagella of Halobacteria by atomic force microscopy. Analyst 119:1943–1946

  16. Kiernan JA (2000) Formaldehyde, formalin, paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde: what they are and what they do. Microsc Today 00–1:8–12

  17. Korhonen TK, Lounatmaa K, Ranta H, Kuusi N (1980) Characterization of type 1 pili of Salmonella typhimurium LT2. J Bacteriol 144:800–805

  18. Kuznetsov YG, McPherson A (2011) Atomic force microscopy in imaging of viruses and virus-infected cells. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:268–285

  19. Lomonosov AM, Egorov SN, Gallyamov MO (2003) AFM of bacterial cells subjected to different factors. Phys Low-Dim Struct 3(4):125–130

  20. Maki-Yonekura S, Yonekura K, Namba K (2010) Conformational change of flagellin for polymorphic supercoiling of the flagellar filament. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:417–423

  21. McEwen GD, Wu YZ, Zhou AH (2010) Probing nanostructures of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances versus culture time by Raman microspectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Biopolymers 93:171–177

  22. Meade AD, Clarke C, Draux F, Sockalingum GD, Manfait M, Lyng FM, Byrne HJ (2010) Studies of chemical fixation effects in human cell lines using Raman microspectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1781–1791

  23. Micic M, Hu D, Suh YD, Newton G, Romine M, Lu HP (2004) Correlated atomic force microscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging of live bacterial cells. Colloids Surf B 34:205–212

  24. Moloney M, McDonnell L, O’Shea H (2004) Atomic force microscopy of BHK-21 cells: an investigation of cell fixation techniques. Ultramicroscopy 100:153–161

  25. Namba K, Vonderviszt F (1997) Molecular architecture of bacterial flagellum. Q Rev Biophys 30:1–65

  26. Paavilainen L, Edvinsson Å, Asplund A, Hober S, Kampf C, Pontén F, Wester K (2010) The impact of tissue fixatives on morphology and antibody-based protein profiling in tissues and cells. J Histochem Cytochem 58:237–246

  27. Pelling AE, Li Y, Shi W, Gimzewski JK (2005) Nanoscale visualization and characterization of Myxococcus xanthus cells with atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6484–6489

  28. Roosjen A, Boks NP, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Norde W (2005) Influence of shear on microbial adhesion to PEO-brushes and glass by convective-diffusion and sedimentation in a parallel plate flow chamber. Colloids Surf B 46:1–6

  29. Sahu K, Bansal H, Mukherjee C, Sharma M, Gupta PK (2009) Atomic force microscopic study on morphological alterations induced by photodynamic action of toluidine blue O in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Photochem Photobiol B 96:9–16

  30. Samatey FA, Imada K, Nagashima S, Vonderviszt F, Kumasaka T, Yamamoto M, Namba K (2001) Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling. Nature 410:331–337

  31. Schmid T, Burkhard J, Yeo BS, Zhang W, Zenobi R (2008) Towards chemical analysis of nanostructures in biofilms I: imaging of biological nanostructures. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:1899–1905

  32. St-Laurent J, Boulay ME, Prince P, Bissonnette E, Boulet LP (2006) Comparison of cell fixation methods of induced sputum specimens: an immunocytochemical analysis. J Immunol Methods 308:36–42

  33. Stukalov O, Korenevsky A, Beveridge TJ, Dutcher JR (2008) Use of atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy for correlative studies of bacterial capsules. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5457–5465

  34. Suthipintawong C, Leong ASY, Vinyuvat S (1996) Immunostaining of cell preparations: a comparative evaluation of common fixatives and protocols. Diagn Cytopathol 15:167–174

  35. Telford JL, Barocchi MA, Margarit I, Rappuoli R, Grandi G (2006) Pili in Gram-positive pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:509–519

  36. Touhami A, Jericho MH, Boyd JM, Beveridge TJ (2006) Nanoscale characterization and determination of adhesion forces of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili by using atomic force microscopy. J Bacteriol 188:370–377

  37. Vekemans K, Rosseel L, Wisse E, Braet F (2004) Immuno-localization of Fas and FasL in rat hepatic endothelial cells: influence of different fixation protocols. Micron 35:303–306

  38. Young KD (2007) Bacterial morphology: why have different shapes? Curr Opin Microbiol 10:596–600

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Hong Kong UGC One-off Special Equipment Grant Scheme (SEG HKU10) for the financial support on this study, and Yuanqing Chao wishes to thank the University of Hong Kong for the postgraduate studentship. The technical assistance of Ms. Vicky Fung is greatly appreciated.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Correspondence to Tong Zhang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 211 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chao, Y., Zhang, T. Optimization of fixation methods for observation of bacterial cell morphology and surface ultrastructures by atomic force microscopy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92, 381–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3551-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fixation methods
  • Cell morphology
  • Ultrastructure
  • Atomic force microscopy